Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Forbes: What we are getting wrong about Schrodinger’s cat

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Don’t miss the cute kitten in the hedder photo:

In other words, pretty much everything you’ve ever heard about Schrödinger’s cat is probably a myth, with the sole exception of the fact that quantum systems actually are well-described by a probabilistically weighted superposition of all possible, allowable states, and that an observation or measurement will always reveal one and only one definitive state.

This is not only true, but it’s true irrespective of which quantum interpretation you choose. It doesn’t matter whether you’re selecting one outcome out of the ensemble of all possible outcomes; it doesn’t matter whether you’re collapsing an indeterminate wavefunction into a determinate state; it doesn’t matter if you’re falling into one particular Universe out of an infinite suite of parallel Universes.

All that matters is that a quantum observation has occurred.

Ethan Siegel, “Ask Ethan: What Are We Getting Wrong About Schrodinger’s Cat?” at Forbes

If a cat is involved, we bet there is more to the story.

Comments
This is an old joke, but still makes me laugh Is he gonna get hurt during the expirement? Schrödinger: Yesn'tBrunoAr
June 29, 2020
June
06
Jun
29
29
2020
04:39 AM
4
04
39
AM
PDT
AAR, Nil, This is strictly a thought experiment, though one could rig up a mouse and a RA controlled vial of poison or the like. KFkairosfocus
June 29, 2020
June
06
Jun
29
29
2020
01:20 AM
1
01
20
AM
PDT
> what was the Universe like before we were aware of quantum phenomena and began observing them We have no idea what it is which collapses the wavefunction (and where is the random number generator involved located and who runs it). We don't know if anything (other than pure mathematical equations) "exists" at all. Do not ever visualize atoms or electrons as little "balls". They are anything but. They are basically complex functions in space and time, and they are "spread" nearly infinitely in space. "Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real." Niels BohrEugene
June 28, 2020
June
06
Jun
28
28
2020
11:50 PM
11
11
50
PM
PDT
How many cat's died during the "Schrodinger’s cat" experiment?aarceng
June 28, 2020
June
06
Jun
28
28
2020
10:16 PM
10
10
16
PM
PDT
It must be referring to a con-cat-enation of quantum states. (Sorry) I know I'm going to regret asking this but, if the final or collapsed state is entirely dependent on an observation being performed, what was the Universe like before we were aware of quantum phenomena and began observing them?Seversky
June 28, 2020
June
06
Jun
28
28
2020
05:28 PM
5
05
28
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply