Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Medical Express: First direct evidence that babies react to taste and smell in the womb

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A study led by Durham University’s Fetal and Neonatal Research Lab, UK, took 4D ultrasound scans of 100 pregnant women to see how their unborn babies responded after being exposed to flavors from foods eaten by their mothers.

Researchers looked at how the fetuses reacted to either carrot or kale flavors just a short time after the flavors had been ingested by the mothers.

Fetuses exposed to carrot showed more “laughter-face” responses while those exposed to kale showed more “cry-face” responses.

First direct evidence that babies react to taste and smell in the womb
A 4D scan image of the same fetus (as in the laughter-face baseline image) showing a laughter-face reaction after being exposed to the carrot flavour. Credit: FETAP (Fetal Taste Preferences) Study, Fetal and Neonatal Research Lab, Durham University.

Their findings could further our understanding of the development of human taste and smell receptors.

The researchers also believe that what pregnant women eat might influence babies’ taste preferences after birth and potentially have implications for establishing healthy eating habits.

The study is published in the journal Psychological Science.

Humans experience flavor through a combination of taste and smell. In fetuses it is thought that this might happen through inhaling and swallowing the amniotic fluid in the womb.

Mothers were given a single capsule containing approximately 400mg of carrot or 400mg kale powder around 20 minutes before each scan. They were asked not to consume any food or flavored drinks one hour before their scans.

Facial reactions seen in both flavor groups, compared with fetuses in a control group who were not exposed to either flavor, showed that exposure to just a small amount of carrot or kale flavor was enough to stimulate a reaction.

“Previous research conducted in my lab has suggested that 4D ultrasound scans are a way of monitoring fetal reactions to understand how they respond to maternal health behaviors such as smoking, and their mental health including stress, depression, and anxiety.

“This latest study could have important implications for understanding the earliest evidence for fetal abilities to sense and discriminate different flavors and smells from the foods ingested by their mothers.”

The researchers say their findings might also help with information given to mothers about the importance of taste and healthy diets during pregnancy.

They have now begun a follow-up study with the same babies post-birth to see if the influence of flavors they experienced in the womb affects their acceptance of different foods.

Medical Express

These findings seem to support the conclusion that the unborn are alive and human. But does the flavor of carrots make you smile?

Comments
Yeah, I’m not gonna get into this tail chasing exercise with you. Your bluntness does not convince anyone of your rightness. If you want people to value your arguments you must show why they are valuable to them first which you don’t you’re just bluntAaronS1978
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
09:37 AM
9
09
37
AM
PDT
AS1978 at 113, Close minded. I see. Now you are the one imposing your idea of what 'close minded' is on me. So, what is your definition of close minded? Is it, "If you don't agree with me I will give you the label 'close minded'"? I think you should reconsider what you call "aggressive" regarding my replies. Yes, I am blunt and to the point. I prefer to be direct as opposed to sounding wishy-washy and vague. Too many people like vague and wishy-washy. Blunt and to the point is designed to get people's attention. That's all.relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
09:15 AM
9
09
15
AM
PDT
Ask yourself: Who or what influences you? Something good, something bad? How do you determine that?relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
09:09 AM
9
09
09
AM
PDT
@Relatd No they don’t offend me You just come across as aggressive and closed minded like most atheists and Marxist on the site You are just the opposite extreme And none media answers? When discussing Covid with you last time your answers were very inline with the mediaAaronS1978
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
09:08 AM
9
09
08
AM
PDT
Total Strangers = a synonym for the general world. That’s a new one to me.Viola Lee
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
08:47 AM
8
08
47
AM
PDT
AS1978 at 110, My answers offend you? Why is that? Could it be because they are the total opposite of the Marxist-Atheist media? I know most people are used to the Media and that is why, I suspect, that my totally non-Media answers are offensive to some.relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
08:40 AM
8
08
40
AM
PDT
@ Relatd I’m plenty aware I added condemned. And I appreciate you checking in on whether I can read. I use the word condemn because it’s a combination of how you present your answers, and how you react to people that disagree with you kind of like in your last message to me. @ CD The one thing that I will agree with you is that yes there are very few people with good sense of humor on this site. Of all people BA77 was the only person that ever participated in some of my goofiness when I deployed the sarcastibutton. Often when one uses humor here you get crickets. However, your humor is a matter of poor tastes and bad placement as it comes across as mocking members of the site. For example your nickname. You and your friends probably giggled your asses off when you named yourself Chuckdarwin on an ID site. But the humor is only funny amongst you and your friends because you share the same distain for intelligent design and God. It’s also pretty ballsey to do that. It would be similar if I showed up on the site “why evolution is true” as “Jesus fish”. But the problem is is your humor often comes across as mocking your audience, so I wouldn’t expect anybody to really laugh at some of your jokes here.AaronS1978
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
08:31 AM
8
08
31
AM
PDT
SG at 105, I never said that. You're another one who is twisting words. The World, meaning Total Strangers, can tell everyone what to think but when I write something, I don't get the opportunity - at all? The Church, and myself, does propose. It does not impose. I would appreciate it if you remember that.relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
08:04 AM
8
08
04
AM
PDT
AS1978 at 96, Whoa. You can't read, can you? Did I use the word condemned? I think not. "My version" of Catholicism is quoting the Church. OK? I quote the Church. I quote the Church's version of Catholicism because it is the truth. I'd appreciate it if you read, and quote, what I actually write and not add any words I did not write.relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
07:58 AM
7
07
58
AM
PDT
Viola’s opinion has a certain ring to it.
Do they contradict? If one set of rules is correct and it includes both of the sub-rules, are not both positions then correct? Some of the concepts are ambiguous. For example, what does the word "equal" mean? It has many, many definitions. Every day I meet someone who is better than myself at something. One of the maxims of Dale Carnegie was that everyone you meet is better than you at something. Another truism is that most people get better at certain things over time. They are not equal with themselves as this happens. Obviously some forms of equality are a mirage.jerry
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
06:46 AM
6
06
46
AM
PDT
:-)Viola Lee
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
05:58 AM
5
05
58
AM
PDT
This has been an interesting discussion between Relatd and Viola Lee. To summarize: Relatd: “everybody must follow the rules that I follow.” Viola Lee: “I hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Viola’s opinion has a certain ring to it.Sir Giles
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
05:56 AM
5
05
56
AM
PDT
AaronS1978/102 My but the folks on this blog are a humorless lot. Reminds me of another quip, this one from Mark Twain, that when I see the type of people who have gone to a better world, I'm moved to lead a different life......chuckdarwin
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
05:34 AM
5
05
34
AM
PDT
Back at 91, relatd wrote to me, "If you are interested in salvation, I suggest you compare the values you picked with Church teaching." I don't believe in Christian ideas about salvation, so that really doesn't apply to me.Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
08:03 PM
8
08
03
PM
PDT
@ CD it’s more like using responsibility than mathematics…….AaronS1978
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
07:22 PM
7
07
22
PM
PDT
It was either Bertrand Russell or George Bernard Shaw who quipped that it is odd that the Catholic Church allows people to use mathematics for birth control but not chemistry or physics…….chuckdarwin
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
07:19 PM
7
07
19
PM
PDT
@ Viola Lee Vasectomies, yup but honestly it goes both ways too, they don’t what women to get their tubes tied either. There are exceptions though, like my mother who had to have it done because of issues with her ovaries. Although the vasectomy thing was never a big deal for me at least because I would never do anything with anyone unless we mutually agreed on what comes next.AaronS1978
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
07:13 PM
7
07
13
PM
PDT
I don't think I was trying to make him look hypocritical. I am trying to find out more of the details of his views. Back at 34 he asked if I was a feminist. I asked if he could provide more details about what that meant. We then got to talking about what I see are his out-dated conceptions about what is going on in society in respect to sexual issues. I was astounded to find that vasectomies were prohibited, by the way.Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
06:55 PM
6
06
55
PM
PDT
My statement was based off your line of questioning which seemed like you were trying to make him look hypocritical by nitpicking and splitting hairs about the roll of women in the Catholic religion and entitled rights to equal pleasure when it comes to sex in the marriage. If I was wrong I’m sorryAaronS1978
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
06:33 PM
6
06
33
PM
PDT
How am I splitting hairs? I have been talking about how the world is different now than the 40-50 years ago relatd appears to be referencing, and also interested in Catholic beliefs that affect sexual activity. I haven't been talking at all about abortion per se. That is different than what you were talking, but not splitting hairs, which usually refers to making distinctions that don't really make a difference. I think factors that have reduced abortion and lowered teenage sexual activity, for instance, are important changes in society.Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
06:23 PM
6
06
23
PM
PDT
Well, after reading all of the comments, I see that everybody has gone completely off the deep end Viola Lee is splitting hairs and Relatd is saying anyone who doesn’t conform to his version of catholicism shall be condemned and if Catholics don’t make them conform they to will be condemned I’m going back to what the OP said the baby is not a clump of cells, it’s a living human being. It is wrong to kill a living human being under any circumstance because we all have a right to live. Everybody here was given that right to live and in turn have a right to our bodily autonomy. The unborn have a body and you don’t have a right to take it away. They are defenseless humans and all humans have the same rights. Peace.AaronS1978
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
06:15 PM
6
06
15
PM
PDT
@94 uhm yes Not sure why they wouldn’t But hey this was the first question I saw so I answered. I expected an interesting and rather aggressive answer from Relatd as I’m sure this question was directed at himAaronS1978
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
05:58 PM
5
05
58
PM
PDT
OK, I accept that desire varies, so let me separate the questions: In respect to Catholic belief, within marriage, does a woman have as much right to pleasurable sex as a man?Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
04:58 PM
4
04
58
PM
PDT
VL at 92, What a strange question. A woman experiences whatever an average woman experiences and the same for the man.relatd
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
04:44 PM
4
04
44
PM
PDT
Related: here's a relevant question. As a Catholic, or in respect to Catholic belief, within marriage, does a woman have as much desire for and right to pleasurable sex as a man?Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
04:26 PM
4
04
26
PM
PDT
VL at 90, If you are interested in salvation, I suggest you compare the values you picked with Church teaching.relatd
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
04:03 PM
4
04
03
PM
PDT
Who told you? Parents, your church, people around you, but as you matured you assimilated certain values and made them your own. Same for me, except instead of a particular church I had a broader range of influences, I imagine.Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
03:55 PM
3
03
55
PM
PDT
VL at 88, Who told you what was right and what was wrong? Ask yourself this question.relatd
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
03:52 PM
3
03
52
PM
PDT
Relatd, you write, "You are just repeating the old – and useless – Hippie line with its emphasis on sexual pleasure." I am not "emphasizing" sexual pleasure, but I am saying it is a valuable and desired part of almost all marriages, by both the husband and the wife. That is not "hippie"-ish. Do you agree: that in most marriages both the man and the woman desire and value sexual pleasure, one benefit being that that pleasure helps "make love" between them?Viola Lee
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
03:37 PM
3
03
37
PM
PDT
VL at 85, Who told you what was right and what was wrong? Ask yourself this question.relatd
September 25, 2022
September
09
Sep
25
25
2022
03:35 PM
3
03
35
PM
PDT
1 3 4 5 6 7 8

Leave a Reply