Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Medical Express: First direct evidence that babies react to taste and smell in the womb

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A study led by Durham University’s Fetal and Neonatal Research Lab, UK, took 4D ultrasound scans of 100 pregnant women to see how their unborn babies responded after being exposed to flavors from foods eaten by their mothers.

Researchers looked at how the fetuses reacted to either carrot or kale flavors just a short time after the flavors had been ingested by the mothers.

Fetuses exposed to carrot showed more “laughter-face” responses while those exposed to kale showed more “cry-face” responses.

First direct evidence that babies react to taste and smell in the womb
A 4D scan image of the same fetus (as in the laughter-face baseline image) showing a laughter-face reaction after being exposed to the carrot flavour. Credit: FETAP (Fetal Taste Preferences) Study, Fetal and Neonatal Research Lab, Durham University.

Their findings could further our understanding of the development of human taste and smell receptors.

The researchers also believe that what pregnant women eat might influence babies’ taste preferences after birth and potentially have implications for establishing healthy eating habits.

The study is published in the journal Psychological Science.

Humans experience flavor through a combination of taste and smell. In fetuses it is thought that this might happen through inhaling and swallowing the amniotic fluid in the womb.

Mothers were given a single capsule containing approximately 400mg of carrot or 400mg kale powder around 20 minutes before each scan. They were asked not to consume any food or flavored drinks one hour before their scans.

Facial reactions seen in both flavor groups, compared with fetuses in a control group who were not exposed to either flavor, showed that exposure to just a small amount of carrot or kale flavor was enough to stimulate a reaction.

“Previous research conducted in my lab has suggested that 4D ultrasound scans are a way of monitoring fetal reactions to understand how they respond to maternal health behaviors such as smoking, and their mental health including stress, depression, and anxiety.

“This latest study could have important implications for understanding the earliest evidence for fetal abilities to sense and discriminate different flavors and smells from the foods ingested by their mothers.”

The researchers say their findings might also help with information given to mothers about the importance of taste and healthy diets during pregnancy.

They have now begun a follow-up study with the same babies post-birth to see if the influence of flavors they experienced in the womb affects their acceptance of different foods.

Medical Express

These findings seem to support the conclusion that the unborn are alive and human. But does the flavor of carrots make you smile?

Comments
“But if that did happen then, assuming He let me get a word out, I would have to say that He should be held accountable for vastly more sin and suffering than I have ever caused.” ROFL. You have made these types of comments before and I pointed out to you that you have not thought this through and it’s an incredibly stupid thing to say. Who exactly is going to hold God accountable? I can assure you this, IF the Judeo Christian God exists the only speaking will be the sound of you defecating in your pants. Vividvividbleau
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
09:44 PM
9
09
44
PM
PDT
People try so hard to minimize the fetal stage of human life when this is the stage that determines your entire lifeAaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
08:54 PM
8
08
54
PM
PDT
“Not what I was saying. The question is whether a partly-formed fetus is actually capable of experiencing the fear and pain felt by a fully-developed adult, which is what the anti-abortionists are trying to tell us. If I had such experiences then I certainly don’t remember them from before I was born. I don’t actually remember much from immediately after I was born come to that.” First of all, you’re not gonna remember anything if you’re anesthetized, you’re also not gonna remember anything if you sleepwalk You probably also don’t remember anything if you party too hard the night before And it certainly doesn’t matter if you don’t remember anything from a stage of your life it was still your stage of your life because if actually went in and aborted you in your mothers womb, you wouldn’t have any other stages of your life to remember. Two other things of note “a partly-formed fetus“ Anything to dehumanize and minimize what you’re trying to kill. We do similar with lab animals. “anti-abortionists” Love this term then we don’t have to use pretty terms like pro-choice and planned parenthood. We can use abortion clinic and pro-abortionistAaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
07:43 PM
7
07
43
PM
PDT
@ 141 Sev LOL REALLY!? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Sorry, I’m gonna be rude on this one but you hit a whole new level of stupid with that comment https://tenor.com/bmtt5.gifAaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
07:30 PM
7
07
30
PM
PDT
AaronS1978/136
Accordingly to Sev it effectively ok to kill someone at a stage of life they might not remember. Time to line up everyone with memory loss and Alzheimer’s. Hell I don’t remember what I was doing when I was asleep which is what you do most of the time when your are in your mothers womb.
Not what I was saying. The question is whether a partly-formed fetus is actually capable of experiencing the fear and pain felt by a fully-developed adult, which is what the anti-abortionists are trying to tell us. If I had such experiences then I certainly don't remember them from before I was born. I don't actually remember much from immediately after I was born come to that.
Seversky
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
07:24 PM
7
07
24
PM
PDT
AaronS1978/133
Makes me almost kind of think you’re making story about your daughter up to see people take swings that you and then you can call them insensitive if they do
Makes me almost kind of think you are another Alex Jones wannabe. The Sandy Hook shootings are explained away as having been faked by a nefarious government as a false-flag operation. SG's making up this story about his daughter. Makes it a whole lot easier to dismiss rather than deal with.Seversky
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
07:04 PM
7
07
04
PM
PDT
Relatd/126
So if an aged person is given a drug so that he feels nothing and then another drug that kills him, that’s OK?
As with abortion, it would depend on the circumstances of the case. For example, if the patient was in the terminal stage of a cancer that was causing increasing pain that even the strongest painkiller could not mitigate then it might be the patient's wish that their life be ended as their continued suffering would serve no purpose, least of all to them. Or would you insist that their suffering should continue until nature takes its course?
You are just hiding behind numbers.
So are you. You are assuming that the vast majority of abortions are performed because the unborn child is an inconvenience because that makes it simpler and easier to call for a blanket ban on abortion But you don't know the circumstances of each of those millions of cases any more than I do. Life and the moral choices it presents to us are often a lot more difficult than we'd like.
The word “rights” is not a free pass to any action. The mother has no rights.
Outrageous. The mother absolutely does have rights, more so than the child. The problem is balancing those rights against one another. It may be that in many cases the right to life of the unborn outweighs the mother's other rights but in other cases the rights of the mother take precedence. We need to know the circumstances of each case to make an informed decision.
You are judging God? I fear for you Seversky for when you stand before Him to give an account for your life. The “I had no empirical evidence that you were real” excuse will not get you far in light of the fact that you have heard the truth.
Since I don't believe your God is real then the possibility of standing before Him to be judged is not exactly a threat. But if that did happen then, assuming He let me get a word out, I would have to say that He should be held accountable for vastly more sin and suffering than I have ever caused.Seversky
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
06:40 PM
6
06
40
PM
PDT
I mean while we’re at it since you’re using your daughter for moral leverage I think you’re pretty shit father She might not be in that situation if you were a better parentAaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
06:13 PM
6
06
13
PM
PDT
Why would anybody assume that you give a shit about BA77 religious psychopath when you don’t give a shit about your granddaughterAaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
06:10 PM
6
06
10
PM
PDT
BA77: Sir Giles at 127, if you would have read for context, Seversky gave me the option of choosing between him or God for answering his question “So who is the psychopath?”
Given what my daughter is going through, you assume that I give a shit about your religious psychopathy. Here is a hint. I don’t. If I had a choice between the moral comfort provided by you or Seversky, you would not be in the running.Sir Giles
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
05:57 PM
5
05
57
PM
PDT
Accordingly to Sev it effectively ok to kill someone at a stage of life they might not remember. Time to line up everyone with memory loss and Alzheimer’s. Hell I don’t remember what I was doing when I was asleep which is what you do most of the time when your are in your mothers womb.AaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
05:47 PM
5
05
47
PM
PDT
Sir Giles at 127, if you would have read for context, Seversky gave me the option of choosing between him or God for answering his question “So who is the psychopath?” For me the answer is not even close, if the option is between God or Seversky, of if the option is between God and any other mortal human being on the face of earth for that matter, the answer will always be that the mortal human is to be considered a psychopath when he is foolish enough to compare himself with God. As even Isaiah himself stated when he was in the presence of the Lord, “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Isaiah 6:5 “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Perhaps the following Near Death Experience testimony will give you a small glimpse of exactly Who Seversky is trying to compare himself with:
“I feel as if there are no words in our limited vocabulary to describe what I experienced.,,, The only human emotion I could feel was pure, unrelenting, unconditional love. Take the unconditional love a mother has for a child and amplify it a thousand fold, then multiply exponentially. The result of your equation would be as a grain of sand is to all the beaches in the world. So, too, is the comparison between the love we experience on earth to what I felt during my experience. This love is so strong, that words like "love" make the description seem obscene. It was the most powerful and compelling feeling. But, it was so much more. I felt the presence of angels. I felt the presence of joyous souls, and they described to me a hundred lifetimes worth of knowledge about our divinity. Simultaneous to the deliverance of this knowledge, I knew I was in the presence of God. I never wanted to leave, never." - Judeo-Christian Near Death Experience Testimony ?http://iands.org/experiences/nde-accounts/736-never-wanted-to-leave-the-presence.html
So again, if the option is between God or Seversky, of if the option is between God and any other mortal human being on the face of earth for that matter, the answer will always be that the mortal human is to be considered a psychopath when he is foolish enough to compare himself with God.bornagain77
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
04:38 PM
4
04
38
PM
PDT
Corrections: “Makes me almost kind of think you’re making the story about your daughter up to see if people will take swings at you and then you can call them insensitive if they do”AaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
04:05 PM
4
04
05
PM
PDT
“Pass through a line of harassing protesters but undergo far less pain. Anybody who thinks that women don’t think long and hard about an abortion, or who think that they see it as a convenient form of birth control, is just an insensitive jerk.“ Yeah back at you bud. So I was witness to this aggressive line of protestors praying the rosary quietly. My mother was in this aggressive group of quietly praying protesters when a perfectly sensible individual drove up in his keep Cherokee and started to knock the hell out of the coordinator. Happened durning the “Our Father” prayer very dangerous degrading and certainly aggressive prayer. I couldn’t for the life of me understand why that sensible man got arrested But yeah, they’re just jerks I get you This comment tells me a lot about you none of which is good Makes me almost kind of think you’re making story about your daughter up to see people take swings that you and then you can call them insensitive if they doAaronS1978
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
02:03 PM
2
02
03
PM
PDT
Andrew at 131, The goal of the so-called Sexual Revolution was lots of sex, right? Sex just in marriage? Say no to that. Sex among a certain age? No again. Let's try to lower the age of when guys can have sex with teenagers. Babies? No again. Pleasure is all that matters. And when that happens, you have other, much worse proposals. Hiding behind the word "rights." No, it's just permission to do whatever they want. That's all it is. So, in the 1970s, so-called Adult Bookstores everywhere and selling what? The experiment needs to end. It's caused nothing but harm.relatd
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
10:24 AM
10
10
24
AM
PDT
"there is also the problem of never being told that they can control themselves" Relatd, This is an important point also. All the pathways to the problem have been widened and greased, so that a simple no isn't even considered. Andrewasauber
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
10:17 AM
10
10
17
AM
PDT
Andrew at 129, Too many women have not been told what abortion really is. The baby dies. What is the difference between a woman who is overjoyed she is pregnant and one who is not? For some women, there is also the problem of never being told that they can control themselves. That pills or condoms are not the answer. And for men? Too many men get a free pass. 'Oh, she's pregnant? I'll let her worry about it.' Today, there is a lack of fathers. The one who is also responsible. But, again, some women think, "I don't need a man in my life." Who told them that? Total Strangers? People who want nothing less than separation between men and women. But some men and women know and follow the proper roles for each. The West, because of the failure of the wrong views of human sexuality, will return to Biblical values. The other ways are being shown to be wrong and deadly.relatd
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
10:06 AM
10
10
06
AM
PDT
"That abortion was just another form of birth control." Realtd, Yes, and to put a finer point on it, their thinking has been guided to see it as an easier way out of a problem. Problem arises, problem taken care of. They don't want to know any more than that. Andrewasauber
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
09:56 AM
9
09
56
AM
PDT
SG at 127, I hope you're not trying to give others the impression that very abortion clinic has a line of harassing protestors. I stood in front of an abortion clinic. I was there to pray. I had no intention of harassing anyone going in and coming out. And the same was true of the others I was with. I told myself before joining that group that I would leave if I saw any of them harassing any women going in. "Anybody who thinks that women don’t think long and hard about an abortion, or who think that they see it as a convenient form of birth control, is just an insensitive jerk." But there is hard data that shows a lot of women did not think long and hard. That abortion was just another form of birth control. If you make a statement, back it up. Have you seen this? "Abortion on demand without apology." Apology to who?relatd
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
09:23 AM
9
09
23
AM
PDT
BA77: September 26, 2022 at 10:21 pm “So who is the psychopath?” You are.
Nice mature response. As I mentioned, my daughter is in the process of deciding how she will terminate her pregnancy. She has two options. 1) have labour induced and give birth to a baby who will not survive for long. Undergo the pain of labour. 2) go to a clinic and have an abortion. Pass through a line of harassing protesters but undergo far less pain. Anybody who thinks that women don’t think long and hard about an abortion, or who think that they see it as a convenient form of birth control, is just an insensitive jerk.Sir Giles
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
09:17 AM
9
09
17
AM
PDT
Seversky at 122, "I would agree it is morally wrong to abort a pregnancy without good reason. In my view, there should always be the presumption of the right to life. That the method of abortion may be repugnant is not relevant. What matters is balancing the right to life of the unborn against those of the mother. Do you remember anything at all about your existence in the womb? I know I don’t." So if an aged person is given a drug so that he feels nothing and then another drug that kills him, that's OK? "No, I’m trying to make you understand that not all abortions are at the behest of sinful, callous women whose only concern is to rid themselves of an inconvenience. You have no idea of the circumstances surrounding all the millions of abortions performed." You are just hiding behind numbers. Of the tiny fraction of abortions that are performed to save the life of the mother, the others get a free pass? Even the Catholic Church allows for situations where the baby dies as an unintended effect of the procedure. That is extremely important. The unintended consequence is the loss of the baby. However, if the intent is to abort the baby so that it will die then that is wrong. "No, I don’t want people to be free to kill as many unborn babies as they want but there should be more of a middle ground decided on a case-by-case basis which takes into account both the right to life of the unborn and the mother’s rights." The word "rights" is not a free pass to any action. The mother has no rights. She is presented as the ONLY one who decides. "Abortion on demand without apology." Have you seen that? That is 100% wrong. There is no middle ground. And yes, every single woman is a case followed by other cases. so it is always on a case by case basis. "As for being held to account for immoral behavior, I would not accept judgement from God who is apparently unrepentant for the atrocities He is alleged to have committed in the Old Testament. “Let Him who is without sin cast the first stone…”' You are judging God? I fear for you Seversky for when you stand before Him to give an account for your life. The "I had no empirical evidence that you were real" excuse will not get you far in light of the fact that you have heard the truth.relatd
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
08:36 AM
8
08
36
AM
PDT
Dialogue of the deaf”.
Are you trying to understand yourself?jerry
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
07:46 AM
7
07
46
AM
PDT
I think I'll bookmark this page in case I need an example to illustrate the meaning of the phrase: "Dialogue of the deaf".Alan Fox
September 27, 2022
September
09
Sep
27
27
2022
05:27 AM
5
05
27
AM
PDT
"So who is the psychopath?" You are.bornagain77
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
09:21 PM
9
09
21
PM
PDT
Bornagain77/25
No, I am not saying that. I’m saying that it is blatantly obvious that it is objectively morally wrong to rip apart, limb from limb, another “innocent” human person.
I would agree it is morally wrong to abort a pregnancy without good reason. In my view, there should always be the presumption of the right to life. That the method of abortion may be repugnant is not relevant. What matters is balancing the right to life of the unborn against those of the mother. Do you remember anything at all about your existence in the womb? I know I don't.
Seversky, you brought a few rare examples where pre-term delivery was necessary in order to save a mother’s life. You did this in order to try to justify the many millions or dismemberment abortions that are completely unnecessary.
No, I'm trying to make you understand that not all abortions are at the behest of sinful, callous women whose only concern is to rid themselves of an inconvenience. You have no idea of the circumstances surrounding all the millions of abortions performed.
Your supposed ‘compassion’ for the mother’s life in the rare instances you cited, and your complete lack of compassion for the unborn baby who is being ripped apart limb from limb in the mother’s womb, is literally breathtaking for the sheer hypocrisy displayed.
As your complete lack of compassion for the women involved.
So you want people to be free to kill as many unborn babies as they want, via ripping them apart limb from limb, and yet you are ‘upset’ that God would hold you and others morally accountable for such ‘un-repented’ barbaric behavior?
No, I don't want people to be free to kill as many unborn babies as they want but there should be more of a middle ground decided on a case-by-case basis which takes into account both the right to life of the unborn and the mother's rights. As for being held to account for immoral behavior, I would not accept judgement from God who is apparently unrepentant for the atrocities He is alleged to have committed in the Old Testament. "Let Him who is without sin cast the first stone..."
So Sev, do your really believe that Jesus would be championing dismemberment abortions? Besides being a complete psychopath, you are apparently also completely insane. But alas, I guess the two go hand in hand.
Neither Jesus nor His father spoke out against abortion which you would think is a much graver offense against morality than making graven images or taking His name in vain. And His Father disposed without compunction of large numbers of "sacred" human lives - including the unborn ones - in the various atrocities reported in the Old Testament. So who is the psychopath?Seversky
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
08:17 PM
8
08
17
PM
PDT
re 119. By "kick the can down the road" I mean claiming that your beliefs reflect the "truths" held by the Catholic Church just moves the question as to why one should accept the position of the Catholic Church as true. I'm not sure how "the Media" comes into our play. Almost all of us get lots of information, and hear lots of analysis and opinions, from media sources from all different perspectives and of all different kinds. Where are you getting information from that wouldn't qualify as media?Viola Lee
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
12:17 PM
12
12
17
PM
PDT
Jerry: Some of the concepts are ambiguous. For example, what does the word “equal” mean?
I see “equal” simply as not being excluded from something simply due to your gender, race, religion, etc. you may still be excluded from some opportunity due to a lack of strength, dexterity, skill, or because you are excluded because the religion you follow precludes it. But the latter is a self restriction.Sir Giles
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
12:05 PM
12
12
05
PM
PDT
VL at 118, Kicks the can where? How about all those brainwashed people out there who believe the Media? That's better? And the Media keeps getting worse.relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
10:46 AM
10
10
46
AM
PDT
Realtd writes, "By the way, I am speaking the truth." Often your reason for thinking you speak the truth is because the Catholic Church says so. That just kicks the can down the road, and doesn't strengthen your position.Viola Lee
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
10:27 AM
10
10
27
AM
PDT
AS1978 at 116, You speak for everyone? I don't think so. I always give my reasons for posting what I post. A few here don't like it. By the way, I am speaking the truth. The "you or anyone else can check on" truth. Again, you may not like it. I can't control anyone's reaction.relatd
September 26, 2022
September
09
Sep
26
26
2022
09:51 AM
9
09
51
AM
PDT
1 2 3 4 5 6 8

Leave a Reply