Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Phys.org: Discovery of new types of microfossils may answer age-old scientific question

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Scientists have long pondered how and when the evolution of prokaryotes to eukaryotes occurred. A collaborative research team from Tohoku University and the University of Tokyo may have provided some answers after discovering new types of microfossils dating 1.9 billion years.

Details of their findings were published in the journal Precambrian Research on August 19, 2022.

The Gunflint Formation traverses the northern part of Minnesota into Ontario, along the northwestern shores of Lake Superior. The first bacterial microfossils were discovered there in 1954, with Gunflint microfossils now recognized as a “benchmark” in the field of life evolution.

Discovery of new types of microfossils may answer age-old scientific question
Common types of Gunflint microfossils, with white scale bars at a scale of 0.01mm. Credit: Sasaki et al.

Yet, since the 1970s, little research on the diversity of Gunflint microfossils has been conducted, and no conclusive evidence of eukaryotic microfossils has been reported.

Seeking to reassess the microfossils, the research team carried out a geological survey of the Gunflint Formation and collected microfossil-containing rocks. After investigating the microfossils’ three-dimensional shape and size distribution, they unearthed five types of microfossils: colonial, ellipsoidal, intracellular inclusion-bearing (ICI), spinous and tail-bearing types.

“The newly found ones are more functional,” said the leader of the team Kohei Sasaki, a research fellow at Tohoku University. “The ellipsoidal microfossils resemble modern cyanobacteria, which evolved to improve their tolerance to harsh environments; whereas chemical analysis showed that the ICI microfossils were packed with nutrients.”

This provides evidence that the microorganisms evolved to store nutrients that could weather environmental stress.

Meanwhile, the spinous and tail-bearing types demonstrated features advantageous for motility and nutrient transfer among cells, a typical morphological feature of eukaryotes.

“Although the size of cells is prokaryote by definition, they had already developed eukaryotic functions,” added Sasaki. This indicates that prokaryotes may have begun diversifying their functions and preparing for evolution before the emergence of eukaryotes 1.8–1.6 billion years ago.

The team speculates that the unique environment at the time facilitated the divergent expansion of microbial forms. The collision of land masses accelerated oxidative weathering from the fresh continent to the ocean. This increased the nutrient supplies and raised seawater temperatures, making the marine environment unstable.

“Under such conditions, microorganisms probably diversified their morphology as a survival strategy, paving the way for eukaryotes to evolve,” continued Sasaki.

Sasaki and his team’s landmark discovery will help scientists pinpoint the timing and factors that ushered in the evolution of prokaryotes to eukaryotes, providing not only geological significance, but aiding the fields of life sciences and evolutionary biology as well.

Phys.org

The evolutionary worldview leads researchers to uncritically ascribe any changes in the fossil record to adaptation via evolution. But hasn’t research shown (as summarized in Brian Miller’s recent ENV post) that chance mutations are insufficient to produce novel, functional biomolecules found within the putative adaptations?

Comments
Scientists disappointed again by failure to find an intermediate fossil indicating evolutionary transition between two groups.Belfast
September 5, 2022
September
09
Sep
5
05
2022
08:31 PM
8
08
31
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply