Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Reasons.org: Why Would a Good God Allow Destructive Hurricanes?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Biochemist Fazale Rana writes:

Hurricanes and the Problem of Natural Evil
In the wake of these types of natural disasters, it’s understandable for people to ask, “Why?”

  • Why would God create a world with natural disasters that cause so much devastation and death?
  • Why wouldn’t God intervene to prevent tragedies from happening?
Hurricane Humberto, as captured by a NOAA satellite September 15, 2019. (NOAA Satellites)

For some skeptics, these questions count as sufficient reason to reject belief in God. If God, is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good, surely, he would never create a world with natural phenomena that cause innocent people to suffer and die. They reason that God’s existence is logically incompatible with a world replete with natural disasters. Theologians and philosophers refer to this complaint as the problem of natural evil.

Other skeptics conclude that perhaps the problem of natural evil isn’t sufficient to reject belief in God but it is sufficient to question his goodness. These skeptics complain that they could never worship a God that would sit idly by and allow people to suffer through natural disasters such as hurricanes.

So, how should Christians respond to these serious challenges to God’s existence and goodness?

The Primacy of the Gospel
For Christians, the ultimate response to the problem of evil—whether it’s natural or moral evil—is the gospel. 

Note: The Gospel – God’s response to human suffering – is sufficient to overturn any complaint that God is uncaring or unable to deal with evil. But here let’s address a few scientific explanations for hurricanes and the suffering that often results.

Five Benefits Provided by Hurricanes
Digital meteorologist Jonathan Belles has identified five good things that hurricanes do.1

Hurricanes:

  • Bring rainfall. Hurricanes efficiently produce rainfall, often bringing rain to inland regions. These inland rain showers can help bring relief to areas suffering from drought.
  • Replenish inland plant life. The high winds from hurricanes thin out vegetation, spurring new growth. Hurricanes also deposit nutrients and sediment in these places. These deposits contribute to new growth. The high winds associated with hurricanes also disperse seeds and spores inland, much farther than they would otherwise travel.
  • Break up red tides. Red tides result from the unchecked growth of algae and bacteria. These microorganisms consume oxygen near the ocean surface and produce toxins that prevent other organisms from living in the red tides. Because hurricanes churn and mix the ocean waters, they break up the red tides and help oxygenate these dead zones.
  • Replenish barrier islands. These islands located just offshore protect coastal regions and ecosystems from storm surges and flooding. Beach dunes and vegetation on barrier islands buffer the energy from waves before they collide with the mainland. Hurricanes pick up large amounts of sand and sediment (containing nutrients) and deposit them on the barrier islands, replenishing the beach dunes and making it possible for the vegetation on the barrier islands to flourish.
  • Help balance global heat. One of the biggest benefits hurricanes provide is redistributing heat away from the equator toward the planet’s poles. Due to Earth’s axial tilt, the equator has higher temperatures than the poles. The equator receives more solar energy than any other latitude and the heat of the equator’s oceans rises into the atmosphere. Owing to their size and because they interact with the upper levels of the atmosphere, hurricanes efficiently move heat away from the equator. Hurricanes leave cooler waters in their wake.

Humans Contribute to the Damage Caused by Hurricanes
In light of the benefits hurricanes afford, it becomes reasonable to accept why God would create a world with hurricanes. It’s also important to recognize that in many instances, the pain and suffering and destruction of property caused by natural disasters is better understood as moral evil, not natural evil. To put it differently, human moral failings and lack of wisdom often cause pain and suffering, masquerading as natural evil.

This is certainly the case when it comes to the destruction caused by hurricanes. 

For example, in the United States, an increasing number of people have been relocating to coastal areas that, in turn, make them vulnerable to hurricanes, tropical storms, and tidal flooding. As a case in point, from 1970 to 2020 the population of Fort Meyers, FL (which was devastated by Hurricane Ian), grew by over 600 percent to a population of over 760,000 people. The people who took up residence in the Fort Meyers area (Southwest Florida) knowingly and willingly developed residential and commercial properties over the past five decades that were directly in harm’s way. Living and working in this region is attractive for several obvious reasons. But the consequence of settling in greater Southwest Florida is the inevitable property damage and loss of life from hurricanes.

In other words, much of the death, damage, and destruction caused by hurricanes isn’t God’s fault, but reflects a lack of wisdom on our part. In some instances, it reflects our moral failings because of our unwillingness to ensure that the poor among us are safe from the dangers associated with natural disasters.

Why Doesn’t God Just Step in and Prevent the Damage Caused by Hurricanes?
Assume that God routinely intervened to prevent the damage and devastation caused by hurricanes (and other natural disasters). By necessity, in each instance, he would have to violate the very laws of nature he put in place. According to Christian theology, God established these laws to govern the universe.

Disastrous events arise from the laws of nature. They are a by-product of these laws. The benefits that result from hurricanes, for example, also cause destruction. In this sense, we could think of natural disasters as the result of trade-offs. And trade-offs are inescapable in any universe governed by constant natural laws. 

So, why would God stand idly by and allow these consequences to unfurl? Why wouldn’t he violate the laws he put in place if it means that fewer people would suffer?

This violation would have several consequences. For example, cause-and-effect relationships would break down. Nature would be unpredictable. And if nature is unpredictable, science would be impossible.

The same would be true for moral laws. In a universe where God frequently intervenes, morality is impossible. In his classic work Faith and Reason, philosopher Ron Nash writes:

“The existence of a lawlike and orderly creation is a necessary condition for a number of divine objectives. . . . it is also reasonable to believe that God placed these free moral agents in a universe exhibiting order. One can hardly act intentionally and responsibly in an unpredictable environment.”4

Nash goes on to say:

“If the world were totally unpredictable, if we could never know from one moment to the next, what to expect from nature, both science and meaningful moral conduct would be impossible. While we often take the natural order for granted, this order and the predictability that accompanies it function as a necessary condition for free human action. . . . One reason people can be held accountable when they pull the trigger of a loaded gun is the predictability of what will follow such an action.”5

As Nash points out, unchanging natural laws make the universe (and its phenomena) intelligible. If the laws of nature changed from day to day—or at the Creator’s whim—it would be impossible to know anything about the world with any real confidence. The universe’s orderliness leads to predictability—the most important condition for a rational investigation of the world.

The universe’s intelligibility makes it possible for human beings to take advantage of God’s provision for us, made available within the creation. As we come to understand the laws of physics and chemistry, the composition of matter, and the nature of living systems, we can deploy that knowledge to benefit humanity and all life on Earth—through technology, agriculture, medicine, and conservation efforts. To put it in theological terms, the intelligibility of the universe allows us to unleash God’s providence as we discover and learn about the creation.

The universe’s intelligibility also makes it possible for us to understand phenomena that cause natural disasters and develop plans and technology to prevent—or, at least minimize—pain, suffering, and devastation.

Taking Human Responsibility
God created a world with hurricanes for good reasons. These powerful natural events benefit all life on Earth.

As human beings, we bear much of the responsibility for the harsh consequences we experience when natural disasters hit. Nevertheless, we become upset and question God’s existence and goodness when he doesn’t violate the laws of nature that he has put in place. Laws he designed to govern, sustain, and provide for the creation.

Still, God is merciful. And he expects the same from people who’ve been created in his image. Even though there’s much blame to go around, when a natural disaster hits, we have an obligation to care for those who suffer, to help them recover, and to do what we can to prevent the loss of life and property when future natural disasters hit. In this way, we serve as his agents to help bring peace and comfort to the hurting.

Full article at Reasons.org.

Resources

Benefits of Hurricanes

What If There Were No Hurricanes?” by David Rogstad (article)

Hurricanes and the Climate, Part 1” by Kevin Birdwell (article)

Hurricanes and the Climate, Part 2” by Kevin Birdwell (article)

Is Natural Evil Really Moral Evil in Disguise?

Natural Evil or Moral Evil?” by Fazale Rana (article)

Are Tsunamis Natural or Moral Evil?” by Fazale Rana (article)

Why Do People Die in Earthquakes? Blame Corrupt Governments, Not God” by Fazale Rana (article)

Endnotes

  1. Jonathan Belles, “5 Things Hurricanes Can Do That Are Actually Good,” The Weather Channel, Hurricane Central, August 29, 2017.
  2. PRB, “In Harm’s Way: Hurricanes, Population Trends, and Environmental Change,” (October 20, 2004). 
  3. PRB, “In Harm’s Way.”
  4. Ronald H. Nash, Faith and Reason: Searching for a Rational Faith (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1988), 200.
  5. Nash, Faith and Reason, 201.
Comments
Sandy: All natural events are linked with moral choices of people. Everything is interconnected even doesn’t seems so. That is an astounding statement to make. Are you sure that's what you mean?JVL
January 28, 2023
January
01
Jan
28
28
2023
02:12 AM
2
02
12
AM
PDT
Q “It’s because God loved us so much he gave us Free Will. And Free Will is needed for authentic Love. And Love conquers evil and death” It’s amusing to see unbelievers say silly things like” Why wouldn’t God make a world where evil and suffering were eliminated” they really have not thought through what that would require.Could God have done so? Yes but at what cost? . it would require a severe restriction on one’s freedom of choice.indeed freedom of choice would be eliminated. If freedom of choice was eliminated evil choices would be eliminated and since evil is the deprivation of good moral choices are eliminated as well. We would be reduced to the walking dead. “Outside of that, there’s no such thing as “evil,” and all existence is pointless” Actually evil is nothing (no thing) Vivid.vividbleau
January 28, 2023
January
01
Jan
28
28
2023
01:21 AM
1
01
21
AM
PDT
What is a hurricane that kills a thousand people? The golden rule has nothing to do with this.
All natural events are linked with moral choices of people. Everything is interconnected even doesn't seems so.Sandy
January 27, 2023
January
01
Jan
27
27
2023
10:41 PM
10
10
41
PM
PDT
Jerry @13,
My only comment is that I doubt that this would solve the dilemma that the Christian God is evil because He allows evil to happen.
It's because God loved us so much he gave us Free Will. And Free Will is needed for authentic Love. And Love conquers evil and death. Outside of that, there's no such thing as "evil," and all existence is pointless. -QQuerius
January 27, 2023
January
01
Jan
27
27
2023
06:24 PM
6
06
24
PM
PDT
They’re in charge now and they didn’t prevent the earthquake. Same with diseases and genetic entropy. The world is falling apart under their rule. This is not to say that God can’t or won’t destroy a city or a civilization for their evil.
Well, this answer is a first. In discussing this for 15 years on UD, this the first time I have ever heard this explanation. My only comment is that I doubt that this would solve the dilemma that the Christian God is evil because He allows evil to happen.jerry
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
03:37 PM
3
03
37
PM
PDT
Jerry @10,
Does this mean the Lisbon earthquake was caused by these anti human entities in heavenly places?
They're in charge now and they didn't prevent the earthquake. Same with diseases and genetic entropy. The world is falling apart under their rule. This is not to say that God can't or won't destroy a city or a civilization for their evil. Deception and evil continuing to increase dramatically. There are some U.S. cities that are no longer safe even to drive through, let alone walk around in. -QQuerius
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
02:09 PM
2
02
09
PM
PDT
Jerry: But if they are necessary and designed by the Christian God, how can they be evil? How can you differentiate between that which is designed and that which isn't?JVL
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
01:24 PM
1
01
24
PM
PDT
Evil is whatever violates the golden rule
Fails to understand what the argument is about. What is a hurricane that kills a thousand people? The golden rule has nothing to do with this.
There are anti-human spiritual forces at work in the world. • These act as rulers, powers, world forces of our current darkness, and spiritual forces of wickedness. • They are based in heavenly places
Does this mean the Lisbon earthquake was caused by these anti human entities in heavenly places? Reflexive answers indicates that the word has no meaningful meaning and people have not thought about it. Aside: if one follows the argument to its logical conclusion, it will eliminate the argument from evil against the Christian God. But no one wants to do that. Why? Clue: the argument from evil is based on natural events. Everyone is using examples of moral events. As I said no one here really understands the argument.jerry
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
10:48 AM
10
10
48
AM
PDT
Jerry @8,
But if they are necessary and designed by the Christian God, how can they be evil?
According to the Bible, there's more here than meets the eye. In his letter to the church at Ephesus, the apostle Paul writes:
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. - Ephesians 6:12
What does this tell us? • Humans are not our enemy. • There are anti-human spiritual forces at work in the world. • These act as rulers, powers, world forces of our current darkness, and spiritual forces of wickedness. • They are based in heavenly places. So why doesn't God simply destroy them? As Chuckdarwin eloquently and emphatically pointed out to me in another post, Justice doesn't immediately resort to summary execution! Bravo, Chuckdarwin! • Sufficient evidence must be gathered. • Charges are then filed. • Arguments and cross-examinations are heard in a heavenly court. • Judgment based on Law and facts rather than emotion is pronounced. • And all this takes time. The Bible also says that God specifically prepared the lake of fire for the eternal destruction of these spiritual entities including Satan, who is the current ruler of this world, his angels, and sadly anyone who chooses to reject God's mercy. The wonderful thing is that God arranged for weak and lowly humanity to be the mechanism by which Satan gets convicted and then destroyed. In the meantime, these spiritual forces of wickedness in heavenly places continue to deceive people and cause massive suffering, heaping on themselves additional condemnation beyond any question that they richly deserve to be punished permanently. -QQuerius
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
10:21 AM
10
10
21
AM
PDT
Again, no one lives their life as if morality does not objectively exist.
You are late to argument and apparently have no idea what it is about.
Jerry will have no moral qualms whatsoever when someone stronger than Jerry takes all his possessions away from him simply because he can and there is nothing Jerry can do to stop him?
Never said that or believed that.
departure from that which is objectively good
So a stubbed toe is evil. It makes the definition meaningless. Aside: I have never argued that this world isn't full of unwanted events. In fact I argue that it is full of them. But if they are necessary and designed by the Christian God, how can they be evil?jerry
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
06:30 AM
6
06
30
AM
PDT
It is also not the definition in question
There is no coherent definition. That’s the problem.
we go over old ground
Yes, most definitely. And still no coherent definition. Aside: anyone, explain why an itch/dropped fork/stubbed toe is not evil.jerry
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
06:12 AM
6
06
12
AM
PDT
It was designed to be dangerous and full of struggles
Yes! But why? Is it necessary for this world to be     “The best of all possible worlds.” jerry
January 9, 2023
January
01
Jan
9
09
2023
04:57 AM
4
04
57
AM
PDT
This planet is not Heaven. It was designed to be dangerous and full of struggles.ram
January 6, 2023
January
01
Jan
6
06
2023
10:27 PM
10
10
27
PM
PDT
This is a thread about natural evil. There is a difference between moral evils and natural evils. The former are committed by intelligences with free will and are contrary to a set standard. For example, killing someone for no legitimate reason or torturing babies are two that have been given as examples. Natural evil are occurrences that happen independently of any intelligent input. For example, the people that die in a hurricane or the child that is terminally ill due to a brain tumor are two egregious examples. No individual to blame here so the blame goes to the creator who let it happen or could have stopped it from happening. I’m writing this because while answering a question on another thread, it came to me that moral evil should be independent of the outcome. That is, if an intelligence sets out to do harm to another, but fails not intentionally, is that any different than succeeding at what was intended. An interesting question but not for this thread. But maybe another in the future.jerry
January 2, 2023
January
01
Jan
2
02
2023
12:36 PM
12
12
36
PM
PDT
This violation would have several consequences. For example, cause-and-effect relationships would break down. Nature would be unpredictable. And if nature is unpredictable, science would be impossible.
No. Cause=god, effect=nature. There's no breakdown. Even without god acting in nature, there are other intelligences -- humans -- who are clearly at least in part separate from nature and can act on nature via some kind of interface. God's "miracles" don't change anything.AndyClue
December 30, 2022
December
12
Dec
30
30
2022
08:57 AM
8
08
57
AM
PDT
God does not move people where hurricanes are known to hit. People choose to live in those places. They, not God, put themselves at risk.BobRyan
December 29, 2022
December
12
Dec
29
29
2022
10:50 PM
10
10
50
PM
PDT
There must be doubt to have a meaningful world. That means there must be unwanted things in our life and world. Without these unwanted things and doubt our lives would not be free and would be sterile. We would be automatons.
For Christians, the ultimate response to the problem of evil—whether it’s natural or moral evil
Is to deny that evil actually exist. There is no usable definition for the word and how people use it is definitely relative. So an itch or stubbed toe is evil according to the definitions that most people supply. Aside: if there were no hurricanes, then people would be complaining about any wind and rain storms. Whatever, the unwanted thing is, eliminating it would just mean some other unwanted thing would replace it, often just less of what they want eliminated. People would not be satisfied till they lived forever in splendor in perfect weather and no inconveniences. Oh, they would still find something they didn’t like. And that would become evil. The word is meaningless. These remarks will raise all the nonsense replies by the faithful here. But they don’t realize that the answer is that the word has no meaningful meaning.jerry
December 29, 2022
December
12
Dec
29
29
2022
02:14 PM
2
02
14
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply