Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Science Daily: Fiddler crab eye view inspires researchers to develop novel artificial vision

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Artificial vision systems find a wide range of applications, including self-driving cars, object detection, crop monitoring, and smart cameras. Such vision is often inspired by the vision of biological organisms. For instance, human and insect vision have inspired terrestrial artificial vision, while fish eyes have led to aquatic artificial vision. While the progress is remarkable, current artificial visions suffer from some limitations: they are not suitable for imaging both land and underwater environments, and are limited to a hemispherical (180°) field-of-view (FOV).

Fiddler crabs can look all around, without the need to move their eyes. https://biology.anu.edu.au

To overcome these issues, a group of researchers from Korea and USA, including Professor Young Min Song from Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology in Korea, have now designed a novel artificial vision system with an omnidirectional imaging ability, which can work in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. Their study was made available online on 12 July 2022 and published in Nature Electronics on 11 July 2022.

“Research in bio-inspired vision often results in a novel development that did not exist before. This, in turn, enables a deeper understanding of nature and ensure that the developed imaging device is both structurally and functionally effective,” says Prof. Song, explaining his motivation behind the study.

The inspiration for the system came from the fiddler crab (Uca arcuata), a semiterrestrial crab species with amphibious imaging ability and a 360° FOV. These remarkable features result from the ellipsoidal eye stalk of the fiddler crab’s compound eyes, enabling panoramic imaging, and flat corneas with a graded refractive index profile, allowing for amphibious imaging.

Accordingly, the researchers developed a vision system consisting of an array of flat micro-lenses with a graded refractive index profile that was integrated into a flexible comb-shaped silicon photodiode array and then mounted onto a spherical structure. The graded refractive index and the flat surface of the micro-lens were optimized to offset the defocusing effects due to changes in the external environment. Put simply, light rays traveling in different mediums (corresponding to different refractive indices) were made to focus at the same spot.

To test the capabilities of their system, the team performed optical simulations and imaging demonstrations in air and water. Amphibious imaging was performed by immersing the device halfway in water. To their delight, the images produced by the system were clear and free of distortions. The team further showed that the system had a panoramic visual field, 300o horizontally and 160o vertically, in both air and water. Additionally, the spherical mount was only 2 cm in diameter, making the system compact and portable.

Science Daily

It’s worth highlighting this quote: “These remarkable features result from the ellipsoidal eye stalk of the fiddler crab’s compound eyes, enabling panoramic imaging, and flat corneas with a graded refractive index profile, allowing for amphibious imaging.” Does this sound like intelligent design or the result of unguided, random evolutionary processes?

Comments
Does this sound like intelligent design or the result of unguided, random evolutionary processes?
Why not just come clean and restate the question: "Does this sound like God (more precisely, the Christian God) or the result of unguided, random evolutionary processes?"chuckdarwin
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
06:13 AM
6
06
13
AM
PDT
Asauber: I do enjoy it. There’s little else to be entertained by when dead horses are being beaten. Okay. I'm still interested in what you think the brain is for. But I guess you're not in the mood for a discussion about it.JVL
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:44 AM
5
05
44
AM
PDT
"While I’m sure you enjoy being sarky and sarcastic" JVL, I do enjoy it. There's little else to be entertained by when dead horses are being beaten. Andrewasauber
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:42 AM
5
05
42
AM
PDT
Asauber: Noooo. Really? Somebody did some experiments and research somewhere? I’ll be damned. I’m sure they figured everything out. They just haven’t informed you yet. While I'm sure you enjoy being sarky and sarcastic I am really interested in what you think the brain does and what it's for.JVL
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:37 AM
5
05
37
AM
PDT
"I don’t actually" JVL, Noooo. Really? Somebody did some experiments and research somewhere? I'll be damned. I'm sure they figured everything out. They just haven't informed you yet. Andrewasauber
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:35 AM
5
05
35
AM
PDT
Asauber: Wow, JVL. You really know a lot about brains. ? I don't actually but I have heard about some of the experiments and research. If you think the mind is separate from the brain then what do you think the brain does? What's it for?JVL
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:30 AM
5
05
30
AM
PDT
"brains somehow learn" Wow, JVL. You really know a lot about brains. ;) Andrewasauber
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:20 AM
5
05
20
AM
PDT
Bornagain77: you do realize that neural plasticity, particularly the ability of the immaterial mind to ‘reshape’ the material brain, is antagonistic to the blind unguided process of Darwinian evolution do you not? I don't think so. IF the mind is separate from the brain then there would never be a need for neural plasticity since the actual processing of images and thoughts would be done elsewhere. What do you think the brain actually does? Is it just a transmitter? I would think it would be a lot less complicated in that case. It certainly seems to house some memories as people can lose some of their memories via traumatic events and/or ageing processes. It seems to maintain control over certain bodily functions as well. I've just never figured out what dualists think the brain is doing. And I've never been able to rectify my own personal experience with general anaesthetic and a separate mind from the body. Plus I've never been entirely convinced that anyone has been able to speak to a now-deceased person which you would think would be possible if the mind goes on after the body is defunct. And, to tell you the truth, even though I've heard a lot of them I haven't found any of the out-of-body experiences completely convincing as evidence of there being a non-corporeal mind. Anyway, let's start with what you think the brain is for and what it actually does.JVL
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
05:12 AM
5
05
12
AM
PDT
JVL, you do realize that neural plasticity, particularly the ability of the immaterial mind to 'reshape' the material brain, is antagonistic to the blind unguided process of Darwinian evolution do you not? i.e. You did not come close to answering Martin's question but merely assumed/imagined that something that does not support Darwinian materialism somehow supports Darwinian materialism. in direct contradiction to the materialistic claim that our thoughts are merely the result of whatever prior state our material brain happens to be in, 'Brain Plasticity', the ability to alter the structure of the brain from a person's focused intention, has now been established by Jeffrey Schwartz, as well as among other researchers.
Jeffrey Schwartz: You Are More than Your Brain - 2019 - video interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFIOSQNuXuY The Case for the Soul - InspiringPhilosophy - (4:03 minute mark, Brain Plasticity including Schwartz's work) - Oct. 2014 - video The Mind is able to modify the brain (brain plasticity). Moreover, Idealism explains all anomalous evidence of personality changes due to brain injury, whereas physicalism cannot explain the mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBsI_ay8K70 The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force Excerpt: Through decades of work treating patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), Schwartz made an extraordinary finding: while following the therapy he developed, his patients were effecting significant and lasting changes in their own neural pathways. It was a scientific first: by actively focusing their attention away from negative behaviors and toward more positive ones, Schwartz's patients were using their minds to reshape their brains–and discovering a thrilling new dimension to the concept of neuroplasticity. https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Brain-Neuroplasticity-Power-Mental/dp/0060988479
bornagain77
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
02:27 AM
2
02
27
AM
PDT
Martin_r: How an blind unguided process knows how to invert it back Experiments have been done with humans giving them prismatic glasses which make everything look upside down. In about a week or so their brains somehow learn how to 'flip' the images back to the way they're used to interpreting them. So, part of your questions are answered by the plasticity of neural matter, i.e. brains.JVL
August 3, 2022
August
08
Aug
3
03
2022
01:44 AM
1
01
44
AM
PDT
Doubter@1 Darwinists believe in miracles…. That is for sure…. E.g. inverted image on mammalian retina… … From the moment, a lens was invented by ‘blind unguided process’ the image mammals see got up side down … because of physics … of course, Darwinian clowns will explain to you, that this is not an issue, because you brain inverts it back… Some silly questions: 1. How an blind unguided process knows that something is up side down, and that this is not how it supposed to be 2. How an blind unguided process knows how to invert it back 3. How species survive with up side down image till blind unguided process figured out how to invert it back, unless Darwinists believe that it happened simultaneously in other words a miracle happened ….martin_r
August 2, 2022
August
08
Aug
2
02
2022
09:44 PM
9
09
44
PM
PDT
waiting for sev or the other black knights of monty python to start talking theology and other non-sequiturs...zweston
August 2, 2022
August
08
Aug
2
02
2022
09:15 PM
9
09
15
PM
PDT
It would be interesting to get a plausible just -so story recounting in detail, step by tiny step, how random with respect to fitness genetic variations or mutations slowly but surely changed these parts of the crab's vision system to what it is today. Where each step had to be advantageous not detrimental, even though transitional stages of lens shape, etc. would destroy clear vision, and of course all the different changes to different parts of the crab eye had to change in synchrony or good vision would have been lost. And all it would take to cut off a promising line of descent is one generation with a loss of good vision. I think I had better not hold my breath for this Darwinistic feat to be published in PNAS.doubter
August 2, 2022
August
08
Aug
2
02
2022
07:18 PM
7
07
18
PM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply