Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Beginnings Of A Personal Conviction

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Synopsis Of The First Chapter Of  Signature In The Cell by Stephen Meyer

ISBN: 9780061894206; ISBN10: 0061894206; Imprint: HarperCollins

In August of 2004, philosopher Stephen Meyer published an article in the Proceedings Of The Biological Society Of Washington.  The article raised media interest and outrage because it was the first to “advance the theory of intelligent design” in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.  The editor Richard Sternberg lost his position as a result of the ensuing debacle.

Just a few months later, renowned British philosopher Antony Flew shocked the world by reversing his life-long atheistic commitment and announcing his support for an idea reminiscent of that proposed by the modern intelligent design movement.  That same month the ACLU declared it would be filing charges against the Dover, Pennsylvania school board for approving the teaching of Intelligent Design in its science classes.

Much of the controversy in all the above cases stems from a misunderstanding over what the intelligent design movement does and does not purport to explain.  As many in the movement have re-iterated throughout the years, intelligent design is not in any way synonymous with biblical creationism.  In the words of Stephen Meyer “intelligent design is an inference from scientific evidence, not a deduction from religious authority” (p. 8).

In his recent book Signature In The Cell, Meyer presents a fresh outlook on one of the most compeling facets of the Intelligent Design case- that of biological information in DNA.  When Watson and Crick published their famous paper in 1958, they not only solved the mystery of the structure of DNA but also unearthed the computer program-like nature of the information that it carried.  While experience tells us that such information has its origins in the activity of conscious beings, evolutionary biologists have dismissed such a connection in biology.  As an alternative, they have as we all know placed their belief in the blind activity of natural selection.

It would seem ironic therefore that these same scientists would then employ design-evoking metaphors such as ‘code’ and ‘language’ to describe DNA.  They of course qualify this by stating that the apparent design of DNA is merely illusionary.  Still as Meyer hammers home, the mystery of the origins of DNA and life itself remains one that modern day biology is finding difficult to unravel.

Meyer provides a lucid and personal account of his own experiences as a scientist and philosopher revealing to the reader the watershed events that led to his move towards the intelligent design alternative.  Foremost in his initial exposé are the meetings he conducted with Charles Thaxton who, in his co-authorship of the book The Mystery Of Life’s Origin, rejuvenated the idea of intelligent causation in biology.

Comments
Interestingly 2004/2005 was when ISCID stopped publishing. Almost as if after Dover there was no point anymore. http://www.iscid.org/contact.php
ISCID is no longer being managed as an organization, and thus no longer has contact information.
Allen Macneill also had a blog post about ID activity (or the lack of it) on campus (IDEA clubs). http://evolutionlist.blogspot.com/2008/12/intelligent-design-movement-on-college.html In fairness, Casey Luskin provides a rebuttal in the comments. But I would note that the IDEA centre website notes that "We do not know when the next IDEA Club Leadership Training Conference will be scheduled at this time. " and that was in 2002! There is a list of IDEA chapters available http://www.ideacenter.org/clubs/locations.php Clicking on a few random links brings me to what look like mock up sites with Mario A.Lopez's name on them. E.G http://ideaclubtcw.org/ http://ideacenter.org/sacstate/events.htm Or 404 - not found. http://www.geocities.com/intelligentdesignunl/idtn.html http://www.geocities.com/barabooidea/ http://www.rso.cornell.edu/idea/ http://www.mpidea.com/ or press releases from 2003/4/5 http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/783 http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1235 http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1303 http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1244 In fact, I can't find a single IDEA site that is active in any way whatsoever. Can you? http://www.ideacenter.org/clubs/locations.phpEchidna-Levy
July 1, 2009
July
07
Jul
1
01
2009
06:07 PM
6
06
07
PM
PDT
As many in the movement have re-iterated throughout the years, intelligent design is not in any way synonymous with biblical creationism. In the words of Stephen Meyer “intelligent design is an inference from scientific evidence, not a deduction from religious authority” (p. 8).
Nevertheless, I note that my local bookstore carries it in the "Religion/Christianity" aisle, and Amazon.com currently lists the book as #1 in "Books > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Theology > Creationism" It's also listed as #1 under a coupleof cosmology fields, but shockingly enough for a book called "Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design", it doesn't even seem to be listed in the biology category.Tajimas D
July 1, 2009
July
07
Jul
1
01
2009
06:07 PM
6
06
07
PM
PDT
Wow, vj. I hope in that case the post is not an accurate synopsis!David Kellogg
July 1, 2009
July
07
Jul
1
01
2009
05:37 PM
5
05
37
PM
PDT
It makes the last months of 2004 sound like the ID best times. Wow!Nakashima
July 1, 2009
July
07
Jul
1
01
2009
05:22 PM
5
05
22
PM
PDT
Um, I just wanted to point this out because if I didn't, someone else would be sure to. The information below is available on Wikipedia. Watson and Crick didn't discover DNA. DNA was first isolated by the Swiss physician Friedrich Miescher in 1869. Miescehr found it in the pus from discarded surgical bandages. He gave it the name "nuclein," because it was found in the nuclei of cells. Watson and Crick discovered the structure of DNA on February 28, 1953, although of course they had a lot of help from people like Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin. The first Watson/Crick paper appeared in Nature on April 25, 1953. What happened in 1957 was that an influential presentation, Crick laid out the "Central Dogma" of molecular biology, which described the relationship between DNA, RNA and proteins. The dogma was published in a scientific paper in 1958 ("On Protein Synthesis," Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. XII, 139-163).vjtorley
July 1, 2009
July
07
Jul
1
01
2009
05:10 PM
5
05
10
PM
PDT
Stephen Meyer is interviewed about Signature in the Cell. i.e. the “information problem” in DNA. - video http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplayer/cbnplayer.swf?aid=8497bornagain77
July 1, 2009
July
07
Jul
1
01
2009
04:15 PM
4
04
15
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply