Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Censorship by Google?: In the Western world too?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

(Note: Unexpectedly, this months-long problem has just got solved, shortly after the bloggers started complaining publicly about it. – d.)
 
Web guy Micah Sparacio permits me to publicize this problem at the Post-Darwinist, so I thought I would mention it here too, for the benefit of our blog readers and commenters:

On approximately the 19th of September, the blog operated by Bill Dembski and friends  Uncommon Descent

was delisted from the Google search index.

No reason has ever been given for why the site was delisted, despite requests for reinclusion.

This blog has tens of thousands of legitimate links, especially from trusted institutions of higher education.

This blog had been around for well over a year.

This blog has a Google PageRank of 6/10 (meaning it is considered quite important, even by Google)

The blog is run by a nationally recognized scholar and author [Dembski]

Well, over to you, Google monster. I’ve heard that the problem might have been caused by some idle fellow who swatches copy from Uncommon Descent, so that he and his friends can fool around with it. But if that kind of thing has tied up Google, then Google has some glitches to fix.

Meanwhile, I will try to link to Uncommon Descent as much as possible from the Post-Darwinist.

Comments
[...] November 2, 2006 Censorship by Google?: In the Western world too? [...]UD under cyber attack? That did probably happen back in 2006, so don’t discount it | Uncommon Descent
December 28, 2013
December
12
Dec
28
28
2013
10:31 AM
10
10
31
AM
PDT
Has Google repented? UncommonDescent.com seems to be coming up on top in the following searches of recent topics. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=uncommondescent&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official_s&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=uncommon+descent&spell=1 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=uncommondescent.com&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=College+level+ID+textbook+&btnG=Google+Search http://www.google.com/search?hs=FN2&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=GOOGLE+monster+intelligent+design&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hs=XN2&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=william+dembski+denyse&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hs=EO2&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=Peer+Review+Problem+in+Nature&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hs=Zjh&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=McGrew+makes+an+apology%2C+but+Myers+has+not&btnG=Search Average traffic for UncommonDescent.com even seems to have passed PandasThumb.org: Traffic Rank for uncommondescent.com: 104,634 http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=uncommondescent.com Traffic Rank for pandasthumb.org: 116,200 http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pandasthumb.org%2F&url=pandasthumb.org Thanks Denyse for publicizing the problem.DLH
November 5, 2006
November
11
Nov
5
05
2006
05:43 AM
5
05
43
AM
PDT
I just did a search on DogPile, the multisearch engine and MSN Search found UD.mathemos
November 2, 2006
November
11
Nov
2
02
2006
07:35 PM
7
07
35
PM
PDT
Denyse, I THINK a very smart step for your crew would be to do as follow: You guys SHOULD join dmoz.org to manage the topic "Intelligent Design". If the topic/category does not exist, you need to create it. I don't know all of the extent to which you would be allowed to amange the directory for that topic, but I think it would be a great advantage of ID theory. HERE's WHY... DMOZ.org is an open source directoy. You can contribute to eh structure of the directory. Most importantly: Google gets feeds off of the data from DMOZ. If UD is in the DMOZ directory under Intelligent Design, then it may become immune to Google's relevence flags. To find out more about administering the ID category on the oppen source directory...go here: http://dmoz.org/about.html DO IT BEFORE some less than genuous people jumps in thwart you.JGuy
November 2, 2006
November
11
Nov
2
02
2006
07:30 PM
7
07
30
PM
PDT
Leave it to me to be the conspiracist. I think it possible that a hack did something to trip a relevence flag. There are, afterall, many flks that would like to see this blog offline. Some sad statistics... A google search on: "uncommondescent.com" Oddly yields no website named uncommondescent.com - that is sad, what if I was looking for uncommondescent.com! To add salt to the wound, one webpage that is on the first page of resutls is a link to a Panda's Thumb article. Ssearching for "Intelligent Deisgn" yields a webpage to Talk Origins!!! What kind of relevence is that google? But a tiny glimmer of hope in that IdeaCenter (the club all about Intelligent Deisn) is on the second page set for the same search term. At least Yahoo seems to have3 you in there...but only for "uncommon descent" variations. .. nothing under "Intelligent Design".JGuy
November 2, 2006
November
11
Nov
2
02
2006
07:21 PM
7
07
21
PM
PDT
Intelligent Reasoning- I failed Typing 101Joseph
November 2, 2006
November
11
Nov
2
02
2006
06:19 PM
6
06
19
PM
PDT
That's Ok- look what pops up when you search on Intelliegnt Reasoning. I almost feel like somebody... (I think I felt somebody once...) D'ohJoseph
November 2, 2006
November
11
Nov
2
02
2006
06:18 PM
6
06
18
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply