Intelligent Design Mind Neuroscience News

Compu cog sci prof on the scientific method and human nature

Spread the love

Voytek at Five Books:

As a scientist, I really do believe the scientific method is quite powerful for explaining the world but — at least for the foreseeable future — it is not very good at discussing the human condition. So I think the strength of the arts and the humanities is its ways of discussing the human experience and I hoped to pick up on this in my book choices. The Master and Margarita ?isn’t exactly a scientific book. When you’re looking at how people interact, the suffering, the pain, strife, love and all those crazy things, neuroscience doesn’t really have answers about that. That’s what we’re getting at in the introduction to our book. A neuroscience of love, for example, what does that even mean? Can you really reduce something as complex as love — about which untold numbers of stories and poems and songs and music have been written — to the density of some neurotransmitter in a brain region? Personal experience tells me, no. And from a scientific perspective it also doesn’t really make sense, because we don’t really have a good definition of what love is. And so, if you can’t operationalise things in a scientific way, if you can’t come up with a solid strong definition for the thing you’re studying, then you’re not really studying a thing.

Yes, the risk is creating an artifact like the selfish gene  that the pop science world believes in, which does not exist apart from their specialty echo chamber. Readers?

See also: Neuroscience tried wholly embracing naturalism, but then the brain got away

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Hat tip: Stephanie West Allen at Brains on Purpose

One Reply to “Compu cog sci prof on the scientific method and human nature

  1. 1
    bornagain77 says:

    Scientists discover beliefs can be just as powerful as nicotine – February 26, 2015
    “Our research group has begun to show that beliefs are as powerful a physical influence on the brain as neuroactive drugs,” said Read Montague, director of the Computational Psychiatry Unit at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute and lead author of a study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.,,,
    “It was the belief alone that modulated activity in the learning pathway,” Montague said. “This goes beyond the placebo effect.”

Leave a Reply