Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Darwinians are now determined to make it all about race?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

If not, how to interpret this?

Earlier, we mentioned “Prominent science writer insists Darwinian evolution is ongoing, wants to revive “conversation” about race” and “Geneticists use code words for race, science writer says,” but no one paid much attention.

And we didn’t think that in the age of epigenetics, jumping genes, and bacteria grabbing genes from dead bax, they’d be such dam fools as to follow through with a book advocating the very stuff we could safely and conveniently junk.

Shows what we know! Here, from Wall Street Journal:

A 2009 appraisal of the available genome-wide scans estimated that 14% of the genome has been under the pressure of natural selection during the past 30,000 years, long after humans left Africa. The genes under selection include a wide variety of biological traits affecting everything from bone structure and diet to aspects of the brain and nervous system involving cognition and sensory perception.

The question, then, is whether the sets of genes under selection have varied across races, to which the answer is a clear yes. To date, studies of Caucasians, Asians and sub-Saharan Africans have found that of the hundreds of genetic regions under selection, about 75% to 80% are under selection in only one race. We also know that the genes in these regions affect more than cosmetic variations in appearance. Some of them involve brain function, which in turn could be implicated in a cascade of effects. “What these genes do within the brain is largely unknown,” Mr. Wade writes. “But the findings establish the obvious truth that brain genes do not lie in some special category exempt from natural selection. They are as much under evolutionary pressure as any other category of gene.”

Let me emphasize, as Mr. Wade does, how little we yet know about the substance of racial and ethnic differences 

Yes, well, if the human race subsisted successfully for millennia without this information, how important is it?

What disease does it cure?

Reviewer Charles Murray predicts controversy, based on past experience.

Cat. Pigeons. Betting shop closed for Sabbath observance.

See also: The Science Fictions series at your fingertips (human evolution)

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
We're just trying to figure out why they picked now to do this. We could talk all day about ultimate equality of everyone in God's eyes, but they brought this up, we didn't.News
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
12:39 PM
12
12
39
PM
PDT
Correction To see race in favour of...Creationsgardener
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
12:28 PM
12
12
28
PM
PDT
I don't get the emotional responses on this. What objective and logical reasons are there for rejecting racial differences? Everyone is happy to say black people run faster, jump higher etc. But if anyone says that white people or Asians are smarter, that is evil and horrible? Is it only OK to see face I'm favour of black people? There is no denying the evidence on this, it is clear as day. To be clear, the worth of an individual comes from good moral character, not from how fast they run or how smart they are.Creationsgardener
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
12:27 PM
12
12
27
PM
PDT
Wow, BA! That is really something. Even his hand movements have something of the panache of a flamenco dancer - the female of the species, who make the male look a bit like the pea-hen (wouldn't have gone down well in Carnaby Street..); almost part of the music. Watch this truculent hussy! I expect she was Roberto Durans' mother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=Pe-vaOEGe8U&feature=endscreenAxel
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
07:20 AM
7
07
20
AM
PDT
Axel, you may like this: Jason Kertson playing "Drifting" by Andy McKee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naYbJGlW-CAbornagain77
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
06:13 AM
6
06
13
AM
PDT
It's obvious, isn't it? If there were such a thing as a 'master-race', evidently, preeminently in physical terms, as viewed by Hitler and the desperately muddle-headed atheists (that's putting it too kindly, in reality) adverted to, above, (although certainly not exclusively in physical terms), then the sub-Saharan Africans win, hands down, don't they? No question about it, is there? In more general terms, the Jews, would be the Great White Hope, as the Lord's Anointed (God does not repent of his choices), though they cannot match the Africans physically, nor I strongly suspect in terms of intuition (connatural spirituality - with the emphasis on 'natural', as opposed to 'inherited via a long religious history', as would obtain in the case of the Jews). Although it should be borne in mind that when chosen to be God's angels/messengers to mankind, the Jewish people were initially a simple pastoral people, looked down on by the Egyptians and Philistines, as simple rustics.Axel
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
05:36 AM
5
05
36
AM
PDT
for although the entire human race is genetically deteriorating, it turns out that Africans, contrary to what Darwin, Hitler (and apparently now Wade) would think,
Darwin’s impact—the bloodstained legacy of evolution by Raymond Hall http://creation.mobi/charles-darwins-impact-the-bloodstained-legacy-of-evolution From Darwin to Hitler - Richard Weikart - video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_5EwYpLD6A
Africans are now found to be more 'genetically robust' than other races:
"We found an enormous amount of diversity within and between the African populations, and we found much less diversity in non-African populations," Tishkoff told attendees today (Jan. 22) at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Anaheim. "Only a small subset of the diversity in Africa is found in Europe and the Middle East, and an even narrower set is found in American Indians." Tishkoff; Andrew Clark, Penn State; Kenneth Kidd, Yale University; Giovanni Destro-Bisol, University "La Sapienza," Rome, and Himla Soodyall and Trefor Jenkins, WITS University, South Africa, looked at three locations on DNA samples from 13 to 18 populations in Africa and 30 to 45 populations in the remainder of the world.- New analysis provides fuller picture of human expansion from Africa - October 22, 2012 Excerpt: A new, comprehensive review of humans' anthropological and genetic records gives the most up-to-date story of the "Out of Africa" expansion that occurred about 45,000 to 60,000 years ago. This expansion, detailed by three Stanford geneticists, had a dramatic effect on human genetic diversity, which persists in present-day populations. As a small group of modern humans migrated out of Africa into Eurasia and the Americas, their genetic diversity was substantially reduced. http://phys.org/news/2012-10-analysis-fuller-picture-human-expansion.html "...but Natural Selection reduces genetic information and we know this from all the Genetic Population studies that we have..." Maciej Marian Giertych - Population Geneticist - member of the European Parliament – EXPELLED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6z5-15wk1Zk Daily thought: blue eyes and other gene mutations, April 25, 2013 Excerpt: "Research on blue-eyes has led many scientist to further affirm that humans are truly mere variations of the same origin. About 8% of the world's total population has blue eyes so blue eyes are fairly rare. In fact, blue eyes are actually a gene mutation that scientist have researched and found to have happened when the OCA2 gene "turned off the ability to produce brown eyes." http://www.examiner.com/article/daily-thought-blue-eyes-and-other-gene-mutations Melanin Excerpt: The melanin in the skin is produced by melanocytes, which are found in the basal layer of the epidermis. Although, in general, human beings possess a similar concentration of melanocytes in their skin, the melanocytes in some individuals and ethnic groups more frequently or less frequently express the melanin-producing genes, thereby conferring a greater or lesser concentration of skin melanin. Some individual animals and humans have very little or no melanin synthesis in their bodies, a condition known as albinism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Humans
I wonder what Hitler would have thought of those studies? Verse and Music:
Matthew 27:32 As they went out, they found a man of Cyrene*, Simon by name. They compelled this man to carry his cross. *Cyrene was located in northern Africa LECRAE-IT'S YOUR WORLD - song Excerpt - He uses intelligent design Like eloquence confined Life elements assigned by Elohim my God He left his fingerprints You thinking that our origins are coincidence Our symmetry alone makes Evolution look ridiculous And since our complexity is more than irreducible The fact our design had a designer is irrefutable I use science too to make a statement like this The existence of an atheist proves God exists http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS5fYvyy5Y8
bornagain77
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
03:53 AM
3
03
53
AM
PDT
Well the genetic evidence I have seen on race is far different than what Darwin would have presupposed,,,
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla" ? Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man
,,, And is also apparently far different than what Wade currently thinks. For although the entire human race is genetically deteriorating,,,
Genetic Entropy - Dr. John Sanford - Evolution vs. Reality - video https://vimeo.com/35088933 Critic ignores reality of Genetic Entropy - Dr John Sanford - 7 March 2013 Excerpt: Where are the beneficial mutations in man? It is very well documented that there are thousands of deleterious Mendelian mutations accumulating in the human gene pool, even though there is strong selection against such mutations. Yet such easily recognized deleterious mutations are just the tip of the iceberg. The vast majority of deleterious mutations will not display any clear phenotype at all. There is a very high rate of visible birth defects, all of which appear deleterious. Again, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Why are no beneficial birth anomalies being seen? This is not just a matter of identifying positive changes. If there are so many beneficial mutations happening in the human population, selection should very effectively amplify them. They should be popping up virtually everywhere. They should be much more common than genetic pathologies. Where are they? European adult lactose tolerance appears to be due to a broken lactase promoter [see Can’t drink milk? You’re ‘normal’! Ed.]. African resistance to malaria is due to a broken hemoglobin protein [see Sickle-cell disease. Also, immunity of an estimated 20% of western Europeans to HIV infection is due to a broken chemokine receptor—see CCR5-delta32: a very beneficial mutation. Ed.] Beneficials happen, but generally they are loss-of-function mutations, and even then they are very rare! http://creation.com/genetic-entropy Inside the Human Genome: A Case for Non-Intelligent Design - Pg. 57 By John C. Avise Excerpt: "Another compilation of gene lesions responsible for inherited diseases is the web-based Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). Recent versions of HGMD describe more than 75,000 different disease causing mutations identified to date in Homo-sapiens."
I went to the mutation database website cited by John Avise and found:
Mutation total (as of 2014-05-02) - 148,413 http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/ Human Genome in Meltdown - January 11, 2013 Excerpt: According to a study published Jan. 10 in Nature by geneticists from 4 universities including Harvard, “Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants.”,,,: "We estimate that approximately 73% of all protein-coding SNVs [single-nucleotide variants] and approximately 86% of SNVs predicted to be deleterious arose in the past 5,000 -10,000 years. The average age of deleterious SNVs varied significantly across molecular pathways, and disease genes contained a significantly higher proportion of recently arisen deleterious SNVs than other genes.",,, As for advantageous mutations, they provided NO examples,,, http://crev.info/2013/01/human-genome-in-meltdown/ Scientists Discover Proof That Humanity Is Getting Dumber, Smaller And Weaker By Michael Snyder, on April 29th, 2014 Excerpt: An earlier study by Cambridge University found that mankind is shrinking in size significantly. Experts say humans are past their peak and that modern-day people are 10 percent smaller and shorter than their hunter-gatherer ancestors. And if that’s not depressing enough, our brains are also smaller. The findings reverse perceived wisdom that humans have grown taller and larger, a belief which has grown from data on more recent physical development. The decline, said scientists, has happened over the past 10,000 years. http://thetruthwins.com/archives/scientists-discover-proof-that-humanity-is-getting-dumber-smaller-and-weaker “Our Missing Genes” - The Scientist - February 18, 2012 Excerpt: On average, a person will have about 20 genes that are completely “lost”—meaning that both alleles have inactivating mutations. https://uncommondescent.com/genetics/at-least-1-percent-of-human-genes-can-be-shut-down-without-causing-serious-disease/
bornagain77
May 4, 2014
May
05
May
4
04
2014
03:53 AM
3
03
53
AM
PDT
Genetic Explanations: Sense and NonsenseMung
May 3, 2014
May
05
May
3
03
2014
06:14 PM
6
06
14
PM
PDT
Some of us still don't get why these people are doing this just now unless they have a self-destructive impulse. Who on Earth should treat the human genome as a fully read book?News
May 3, 2014
May
05
May
3
03
2014
06:06 PM
6
06
06
PM
PDT
I just checked Nicholas Wade and he writes extensively on humans and genetics in the NY Times.jerry
May 3, 2014
May
05
May
3
03
2014
05:59 PM
5
05
59
PM
PDT
This will cause a lot of problems. I have heard this author a lot on the john Batchelor show. He is pretty much a Darwinist.jerry
May 3, 2014
May
05
May
3
03
2014
05:50 PM
5
05
50
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply