13 Replies to “Dembski Interview with Mario Lopez

  1. 1
    bornagain77 says:

    That was a very encouraging interview. The strange silence of your most worthy opponents is very telling to the fact that you have reached a level of unimpeachable integrity. I for one think you have done a great service for science by providing the mathematical foundation for detecting design in biology. Your opponents, for the most part, would not know a first principle of science if it bit them on the behind. Keep up the good (but hard) work Dr. Dembski.

  2. 2
    Ben Z says:

    Been listening to Robert Greene I see?

  3. 3

    Ben Z: More than just listen — I teach RG’s books.

  4. 4
    bork says:

    Good interview.

    I’ll try to read some of your more mathematical rigourous work soon- I’d like to finish your NFL book first- school just keeps grtting in the way though πŸ™‚

  5. 5
    Atom says:

    Never mentioned it, but I really enjoyed your new papers on Active Information in Searches. Good work and useful approach to analyzing the information flow in searches.
    We want more. πŸ™‚

  6. 6
    SCheesman says:

    I was wondering when the solution to the mathematical puzzle you posted on your site over a year ago will appear, and the context in which it is applied?

  7. 7
    Atom says:

    SCheesman, are you referring to finding the min-term of the set, that one? If so, I was wondering the same thing.

  8. 8
    tribune7 says:

    He has done postdoctoral work in mathematics at MIT, in physics at the University of Chicago, and in computer science at Princeton University. A graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago where he earned a B.A. in psychology, an M.S. in statistics, and a Ph.D. in philosophy, he also received a doctorate in mathematics from the University of Chicago in 1988 and a master of divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1996.

    Dude! That is seriously impressive!

  9. 9
    russ says:

    Dude! That is seriously impressive!

    I believe its “Dr. Dude” to you. πŸ˜‰

  10. 10
    nemesis says:

    It’s comforting, when reading his books, to know that Dembski has all of his academic bases covered. I find so often that when someone is strictly a scientist, the philosophy behind their theories will be very poor (e.g. Dawkins’ “Methinksitisaweasel” argument, for one), or that when one is strictly a philosopher, one doesn’t know how to apply his learnings correctly to the real world of science. Anyway, keep on truckin’ Dr. Demski.

  11. 11
    christopheratlee says:

    nemesis.

    Are you suggesting Dr. Dembski is not a scientist?

  12. 12
    tribune7 says:

    πŸ™‚

  13. 13
    nemesis says:

    christopheratlee:

    That’s the opposite of what I was saying. I was stating that he is both a scholarly scientist and philosopher, both of which are strongly needed by someone who wishes to put forth good arguments like the ones he does. Furthermore, I really respect his willingness to take the heat that he’s been taking in the scientific community.

Leave a Reply