Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Design: All The Way Down

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

It’s not turtles all the way down; it’s design all the way down: from the constants of physics, to the production of life-permitting chemical elements in supernovae that are coincidentally unstable and spew out these elements to produce rocky planets on which life can exist, to the characteristics of carbon formed in a very narrow window of opportunity in stars, to the characteristics of water and light, to the fact that metals can be refined and smelted in temperatures reachable in carbon-based fire which made technology possible, to the electrical properties of conductors and semiconductors that made electronics and computers possible, to the fact that habitable planets represent the best platforms for cosmological discovery, to the fact that living things contain the most remarkable computer program ever written, the profundities of which we have not even begun to understand.

I presume that the picture at this point should be obvious. Design screams from every corner of modern scientific discovery. The real question is, Why do so many (especially academic intellectuals) work so hard to deny the obvious?

I have an answer to that question, and it should be obvious as well.

Comments
No need to guess. You can get it right from one of the horse's, er, mouths. This email was written by one of the scientists who tried to get Richard Sternberg to quit the Smithsonian because he allowed an ID article to be peer reviewed. See if you can find a motive here. http://www.rsternberg.net/OSC_ltr.htm
"After spending 4.5 years in the Bible Belt, I have learned how to carefully phrase things in order to avoid the least amount of negative repercussions for the kids. And I have heard many amazing things!! The most fun we had by far was when my son refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance because of the 'under dog' part..." The e-mail concludes by lamenting that the school teacher was "religious" and it was unfortunate that there was "anti-evolution education" in the schools.
russ
October 1, 2007
October
10
Oct
1
01
2007
04:25 AM
4
04
25
AM
PDT
The real question is, Why do so many (especially academic intellectuals) work so hard to deny the obvious? "Denying the obvious" is a very common symptom which is almost always found in those afflicted with Reversed Brain Syndrome. It may take several doctors here to help determine the proper course of action for treatment when academic intellectuals are involved, but due to the highly debilitating and contagious nature of the disease it is recommended that the most extreme cases be dealt with by placing the patients in permanent solitary confinement.John Kelly
September 30, 2007
September
09
Sep
30
30
2007
11:21 PM
11
11
21
PM
PDT
The problem with talk about design is that there are some things that clearly strike us designed, when we know that they are not -- faces in clouds, for example. Or eoliths.Carl Sachs
September 30, 2007
September
09
Sep
30
30
2007
11:15 PM
11
11
15
PM
PDT
They'll say that it's apparent but there is no evidence and it is not falsifiable.. "It's apparent but not evident", I guess you could always slap them with a thesaurus upside the head rather than give a long winded reply.Stone
September 30, 2007
September
09
Sep
30
30
2007
09:36 PM
9
09
36
PM
PDT
Because they don't like the implications of "the obvious"?Berceuse
September 30, 2007
September
09
Sep
30
30
2007
09:13 PM
9
09
13
PM
PDT
Oh, tell us! And be a spoilsport? I'll let some of our UD readers comment first.GilDodgen
September 30, 2007
September
09
Sep
30
30
2007
08:47 PM
8
08
47
PM
PDT
I have an answer to that question, and it should be obvious as well. Oh, tell us!Nochange
September 30, 2007
September
09
Sep
30
30
2007
07:55 PM
7
07
55
PM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply