Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Design principles in spider silk

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Spider silk has been an active area for biomimetics research for several years. Spinoff companies have been launched in anticipation of commercial gains. However, despite the enthusiasm and commitment of research staff, the prizes are still elusive. Whilst the main goal is to produce fibres that are as strong and as flexible as spider silk, there are other aspects of the natural material that have attracted the interest of researchers. One of these concerns the ability of webs to be a site for dew collection.

“When Lei Jiang first observed the phenomenon, he was intrigued. “How does that happen?” he wondered. After all, he says, “if you took a human hair, water would not stick to it like that”. His initial curiosity led to an almost five-year-long study. The findings could have implications for the design of materials for water collection and for the efficiency of chemical reactions.”

Not only do webs attract dew, the droplets are able to hang stably on the silk fibres. This suggests the presence of a microstructural mechanism. All polymeric fibres have a microstructure and spider silk is no exception. SEM images reveal a series of amorphous regions (called puffs) and crystalline regions (called joints). The nanofibrils are highly hydrophilic: enhancing wettability and favourable for condensing dew. The puffs have a very open structure and are semi-transparent in images. However, when water starts to condense, the puffs shrink – first to “opaque bumps” and then to “spindle-knots”. As they shrink, tiny water droplets coalesce to form larger drops with movement from joints to spindle-knots.

“Further work revealed that movement of the droplets towards the knots is directed by two forces acting together: the force generated by a gradient of surface energy on the fibrils and the one produced by the spindle shape of the knots. “This is quite different from other reported surfaces, on which drops are driven just by individual forces,” says Jiang.”

[. . .]
Is there an ID perspective on this? Wherever researchers recognise “design principles” in the natural world, the answer is, of course, ‘yes’. The presumption with ID is that design features imply functionality, whether or not we know the details. Dew gathering is a unique and remarkable feature of spider silk simply because other fibres do not display such behaviour. The authors comment:

“We observed such directional water collection behaviour only with wetted silk fibres (that is, wet-rebuilt silk) from the cribellate spider Uloborus walckenaerius; in contrast, silkworm silk and nylon fibres with a uniform structure did not exhibit the directional water collection phenomenon.”

Whether evolutionists can explain ‘how the spider came to gather dew’ is more uncertain. Even with functionality identified, perfecting this highly engineered system makes it most reasonable to infer intelligent, rather than natural, causation.

For more, go here.

Comments
Seversky @ 6 It is true that, before the theory of evolution, you could argue that the design hypothesis was an inference to the best explanation because no one had been able to come up with anything better. Darwin changed all that. He showed that there could be a naturalistic alternative. The theory wasn’t perfect. He didn’t get everything right. But what he did laid the groundwork for a whole new field of research which has burgeoned in the 150 years since. After Darwin, things did change. However, although Darwin's alternative was naturalistic, it was not robust. There are no examples of natural selection acting on mutations that demonstrate novel complex specified information. The examples he gave were primarily of intelligent selection of pre-existing (genetic) information. Despite much work on natural selection, none of the studies has contributed any real insights as to how CSI can be acquired. Whenever the theory is invoked, it is theory abstracted from empirical evidence. In most areas of science, people who wave theory unsupported by data are treated with some suspicion - but in evolutionary biology, it is accepted because there is no other naturalistic option. This is a clear case of ideology masquerading as science.David Tyler
March 13, 2010
March
03
Mar
13
13
2010
08:12 AM
8
08
12
AM
PDT
hrun0815 @ 2 What exactly is the design principle you are referring to? Do you believe that you have knowledge that the intent of the designer was to create spider silk that dew can stick to? The words are not mine - but the authors. They can see "design principles" when they look at spider silk! There is no intent to know the mind of the designer - on my part or on the part of the researchers. Design principles emerge from an analysis of the materials. Spider silk is constructed with a high degree of specificity. In ID terminology, we have here complex specified information. That is what the researchers have recovered and that is what is guiding the next steps of their research.David Tyler
March 13, 2010
March
03
Mar
13
13
2010
07:55 AM
7
07
55
AM
PDT
Whether evolutionists can explain ‘how the spider came to gather dew’ is more uncertain. Even with functionality identified, perfecting this highly engineered system makes it most reasonable to infer intelligent, rather than natural, causation.
Sorry, but this is just neo-Paleyism. Yes, everywhere we look in Nature we can find examples of biological systems and functions of amazing intricacy, complexity and efficiency. A lot of them are better than anything we've been able to design so far. But that doesn't mean they were designed. It is true that, before the theory of evolution, you could argue that the design hypothesis was an inference to the best explanation because no one had been able to come up with anything better. Darwin changed all that. He showed that there could be a naturalistic alternative. The theory wasn't perfect. He didn't get everything right. But what he did laid the groundwork for a whole new field of research which has burgeoned in the 150 years since. Evolution doesn't rule out the possibility of intelligent interference in the course of life on Earth. Some alien or deity - or even both - could have started the ball rolling billions of years ago and even had their sticky little fingers in the process since. The question is, where's the evidence? Hume's criticism of the argument from design still stands. It is argument from analogy and analogy only works to the extent that the two cases being compared are similar. Argument from analogy is not itself a fallacy but the temptation is always to cherry-pick the similarities and downplay the differences and that is a fallacy - the fallacy of selective reporting.Seversky
March 13, 2010
March
03
Mar
13
13
2010
03:55 AM
3
03
55
AM
PDT
So, Franck, What is the design consortium trying to tell us? "We are here, please applaud"?Adel DiBagno
March 12, 2010
March
03
Mar
12
12
2010
02:04 PM
2
02
04
PM
PDT
While Biomimetics and applying the designer's designs to human engineering is truly fascinating, sometimes I wonder if the designer isn't using his designs as illustrations (e.g. spider webs in Job 8 and Isaiah 59) to convey weightier truths. For example snow's "high degree of hexagonal structure and symmetry" is wildly intriguing under the electron microscope but snow used in an illustration like say Isaiah 1:18 could potentially be life altering (if the information is true). Just like fire's destructive power as in James 3:5-6. In other words it is as if the objects of our fascination (spider's silk, snow, fire) are designed proactively to be used as illustrations for a much more powerful purpose and not the other way around as when someone thinks of something to say and hunts for just any illustration.Franck Barfety
March 12, 2010
March
03
Mar
12
12
2010
01:11 PM
1
01
11
PM
PDT
Even with functionality identified, perfecting this highly engineered system makes it most reasonable to infer intelligent, rather than natural, causation.
Do you mean 'because this highly engineered system is perfect it is most reasonable to infer intelligent causation'? If so, what makes you think that spider's silk is perfect? And if you didn't mean that, what did you mean?Heinrich
March 12, 2010
March
03
Mar
12
12
2010
10:00 AM
10
10
00
AM
PDT
I'm sorry. What exactly is the design principle you are referring to? Do you believe that you have knowledge that the intent of the designer was to create spider silk that dew can stick to? Have you considered that the designer might not have wanted this (maybe it's simply a by-product of creating spider silk). Have you considered that maybe he wanted to create a material that dew sticks to and serendipidously discovered silk? Maybe there are other options. How would you know what the disgner wanted to do?hrun0815
March 12, 2010
March
03
Mar
12
12
2010
05:53 AM
5
05
53
AM
PDT
Spider Spinning Web To Music In Fast Motion - video http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4222285/spider_spinning_web_to_music_in_fast_motion/ Here are few more points of trivia on the spider: Engineers have calculated that a woven cord of spider's silk as thick as a pencil could stop a jet in midair. From the book 'Weird Nature' By John Downer Spider Silk Is Stronger Than Steel Excerpt: * The silk thread spun by spiders, measuring just one-thousandth of a millimeter across, is five times stronger than steel of the same thickness. * It can stretch up to four times its own length. * It is also so light that enough thread to stretch clear around the planet would weigh only 320 grams. “On the human scale, a web resembling a fishing net could catch a passenger jet airplane.” On the underside of the tip of the spider's abdomen are three pairs of spinnerets. Each of these spinnerets is studded with many hairlike tubes called spigots. The spigots lead to silk glands inside the abdomen, each of which produces a different type of silk. As a result of the harmony between them, a variety of silk threads are produced. Inside the spider’s body, pumps, valves and pressure systems with exceptionally developed properties are employed during the production of the raw silk, which is then drawn out through the spigots. 34 Most importantly, the spider can alter the pressure in the spigots at will, which also changes the structure of molecules making up the liquid keratin. The valves’ control mechanism, the diameter, resistance and elasticity of the thread can all be altered, thus making the thread assume desired characteristics without altering its chemical structure. If deeper changes in the silk are desired, then another gland must be brought into operation. And finally, thanks to the perfect use of its back legs, the spider can put the thread on the desired track. http://www.harunyahya.com/books/science/biomimetics/biomimetics01.php Biomimicry- Spider Hair: The Perfect Water Repellant Surface Excerpt: Because the trick is done with physics instead of chemistry, the hydrophobic surface manufactured to spider spec does not have to slough off any dangerous chemicals. Sigmund is now working on similar surface tricks that can repel oil. If engineers can figure out economical ways to manufacture these surfaces with enough durability for a range of temperatures, industry will beat a path,,,,. http://www.creationsafaris.com/crev201002.htm#20100224b Amazing Animals: Design Vs. Darwinism - Christopher Ashcraft - Excerpt http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4214676/amazing_animals_design_vs_darwinism_christopher_ashcraft_excerpt/ The 15 Coolest Cases of Biomimicry: http://brainz.org/15-coolest-cases-biomimicry/ Shark Skin As Antibiotic Excerpt: New technologies developed after studying shark skin will soon be appearing at a hospital near you. Scientists at Sharklet Technologies, a Florida-based biotech company, have been studying shark skin for the interesting fact that bacteria just doesn’t seen to stick to it. Under the microscope, it appears that shark skin is composed of diamond-shaped bumps that give it this unique property. Hospital tests using plastic tubing (as used in intravenous lines and catheters) printed with this shark skin pattern showed that microorganisms which can cause potentially serious harm, such as E. coli and Staphylococcus Aureus, were unable to establish colonies large enough to infect humans. Shark Skin Inspires Ship Coating Excerpt: The coating doesn't go anywhere near the engines -- it will be applied on the hull of ships below the waterline, where all manner of algae, barnacles and other wee beasties attach themselves, slowing ships and reducing their maneuverability.,,, Sharks don't have algae or barnacle problems despite being underwater all their lives. Shark skin is made up of tiny rectangular scales topped with even smaller spines or bristles. This makes shark skin rough to the touch. This irregular surface makes it difficult for plant spores to get a good grip and grow into algae or other plants. Mantis Shrimp Eyes Could Show Way To Better DVD And CD players "Our work reveals for the first time the unique design and mechanism of the quarter-wave plate in the mantis shrimp's eye. It really is exceptional -- out-performing anything we humans have so far been able to create." http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091025162459.htmbornagain77
March 12, 2010
March
03
Mar
12
12
2010
04:00 AM
4
04
00
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply