Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams seems determinedÃ‚Â to think for himself about evolution, despite flak from a Darwinist “ass hat” (his term). Although not an intelligent design supporter, Scott makes some of the very points that the ID guys and other non-Darwinians make about the Darwinist interpretation of the fossil record:
IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve been trying for years to reconcile my usually-excellent bullshit filter with the idea that evolution is considered a scientific fact. Why does a well-established scientific fact set off my usually-excellent bullshit filter like a five-alarm fire? ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the fossil record that has been bugging me the most. It looks like bullshit. Smells like bullshit. Tastes like bullshit. Why isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t it bullshit? All those scientists canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be wrong.
If you are new to the Dilbert Blog, I remind you that I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t believe in Intelligent Design or Creationism or invisible friends of any sort. I just think that evolution looks like a blend of science and bullshit, and have predicted for years that it would be revised in scientific terms in my lifetime. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a hunch Ã¢â‚¬â€œ nothing more.
Essentially, Adams is questioning the dogmatic certainty with which Darwinism is held to account for the history of life even though the evidence base is always shifting. Have fun. Read the whole thing!