ID at Cornell — An Unfolding Story

Here is a rather lengthy analysis and commentary of President Rawlings' speech: http://www.rso.cornell.edu/idea/rawlings_speech_w_mlp_comments.pdf ajl

Finally someone is on the side of reason! Benjii

Hats off to Tang. Journalism lives. William Provine: -- When something happens two billion years ago, it’s kind of hard to observe it and see what happens precisely. -- Should be a piece of cake for a Darwinist. If not, claims to rigins turf are void. Senior Lecturer Art Lembo, crop and soil sciences: -- the ability to differentiate empirically between design and randomness holds far-reaching potential for other areas of science. -- And the inability disqualifies Darwinism from use of the term “random.” pmob1

he did? ajl

LOL @ neurode! Bombadill

Great news. However, I don't need any further help to determine whether O.J. killed Nicole. neurode

Hooray for John Sanford being interviewed!!!!! A biologist who made a great contribution to genetic engineering and became independently wealthy as a result. They guy is smart and capable and a tenured IDist to boot. Goes to show, believing in ID did not hinder him in the least from being an effective biologist. Salvador scordova

"The faculty members urged the University and the nation to view I.D. as a valid challenge to some aspects of evolution." I thought this was the best quote of the whole article. PaV

Hooray for Ms. Tang! dougmoran

test. dodgingcars

This stuff about SC being used in a number of helpful ways can't be true. Eugenie Scott has said over and over that ID theorists and their ideas and work have neve done anything for science! Why would she lie? :) jboze3131