Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

ID theorist Michael Behe vs. Christian Darwinist Keith Fox

Categories
Christian Darwinism
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Vid. (opens on click), courtesy Wintery Knight Here’s a summary:

Behe’s first book – the bacterial flagellum

Keith Fox: Here are a couple of papers that show how parts of the flagellum evolved

They are possible pathways.

Michael Behe: No, those are studies that show that there are similarities between bacterial flagella in multiple organisms

Similarities of proteins between different organisms do not necessarily imply a developmental pathway

The problem of having the instructions to BUILD the flagellum still remains

Keith Fox: Maybe parts of the flagellum had other functions before they were used in the flagellum

Maybe you can use the parts of the flagellum for other purposes

Maybe, one can imagine, it’s possible that!

Michael Behe: No, parts have to be modified and re-purposed in order to be used for other functions

Keith Fox: But maybe the proteins can be used in other systems for other things. I re-purpose parts from of designed things to other purposes in my house when I do maintenance

Michael Behe: Uh, yeah – but aren’t you an intelligent designer? What does your home maintenance have to do with Darwinian evolution?

More.

Fox is chairman of Britain’s Christians in Science.

Knight admits that this is a snarky characterisation.