Larry Krauss on why it is silly to teach both sides of evolution
|February 13, 2017||Posted by News under Culture, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, science education|
From Jerry Coyne at Why Evolution Is True:
From Big Think we have physicist Lawrence Krauss showing why the “teach both sides” argument for evolution—and science in general—is fallacious. This argument is now being inserted into school standards by religionists who have lost repeated court battles trying to get creationism and intelligent design taught explicitly in public schools. Their new tactic is to pass school standards allowing or urging teachers to present evidence for alternative views and “critical evidence for and against” theories like evolution and anthropogenic global warming.More.
Larry Krauss, though a cosmologist, is mooted as a possible successor to zoologist Dawkins in the defence of Darwin. Thus he may not know that there is a lot of rethinking going on around evolution these days. But what’s Jerry Coyne’s excuse? A reader writes to point out that ambitious faculty who are not much interested in either scholarship or teaching tend to become administrators or controversialists. See below:
Larry Krauss goes after new US Education Secretary Betsy DeVos
Cosmologist Larry Krauss explains a universe from nothing to an astrophysicist
Also: Gravy train wreck: No Free Lunch for Darwinism in Texas?
Follow UD News at Twitter!