We are told that it is no longer a mystery how the Big Bang ignited:
In a new paper appearing today in Science Magazine, researchers detailed the mechanisms that could cause the explosion, which is key for the models that scientists use to understand the origin of the universe.
“We defined the critical criteria where we can drive a flame to self-generate its own turbulence, spontaneously accelerate, and transition into detonation,” says Kareem Ahmed, an assistant professor in UCF’s Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and co-author of the study.
“We’re using the turbulence to enhance the mixing of the reactions to the point where it transitions into this violent reaction and essentially leads to supernovas, which is exploding stars in simple terms,” Ahmed says. “We’re taking a simplified flame to where it’s reacting at five times the speed of sound.”
The researcher uncovered the criteria for creating a Big Bang-type explosion while exploring methods for hypersonic jet propulsion.
University of Central Florida, “UCF researchers discover mechanisms for the cause of the Big Bang” at Eurekalert
Interesting. But where did your Big Bang get the flame, guys? No fuel, no flame; no flame, no mechanism. Or have you discovered creation ex nihilo?
See also: The Big Bang: Put simply,the facts are wrong.
A mere detail, News.. a mere taradiddle. Look at the big picture…’First you get a flame….’ Actually, very like those jokes, in which the atheist says, ‘First you get bla, bla…’
see SPIRAL cosmological redshift hypothesis and model’s ‘Electro-Magnetic Repulsion’ hypothesis for the Cosmic Inflation Expansion mechanism of how we got from a hyper-sense start to a mature density and sized universe relatively very early in the history of the physical universe. In Volume II of the YeC Moshe Emes series for Torah and science alignment.
Anyone who thinks the “Big Bang” can be likened to an explosion does not know what they are talking about. The creation of the universe was certainly not anything like we would normally envision an ordinary explosion to be like:
As Dr. Bruce Gordon states in the following video, “An explosion you think of as kind of a messy event. And this is the point about entropy. The explosion in which our universe began was not a messy event. And if you talk about how messy it could have been, this is what the Penrose calculation is all about essentially.,,,”
I believe I saw something similar to this many years ago around 2013 or 2014, very similar principal.
Now if anybody read the bottom caption at the end of the article does say that your eureka alert is not responsible for any information or miss information it reports
Now that might be telling you something no different than when Wikipedia Gives you a very similar disclaimer about the information within its archives
Anyways I do not see how they draw the parallels between a small burst inside of an air turbine and the big bang and I don’t mean that in a literal sense
I really don’t see how a small explosion based off of a combustion reaction and turbulence can be likened under any circumstance to the Big Bang.
“But where did your Big Bang get the flame, guys?”
Cosmic Zippo?
Spontaneous. Combustion.
It isn’t that difficult to understand how it ignited. All the Darwinsits suddenly suddenly started to ask themselves real questions about their beliefs. The tiny explosions inside the unused parts of their brain sent a the ignition across space time, which is what caused the initial ignition.
Oh, dear…
Perhaps UCF is trying to publish as much nonsense as possible in order to pull their ranking up?
Even within their own state they are ranked far below 3 universities:
2020 US News public university ranking
UF 7
FSU 18
USF 44
UCF 79
At least this publication called somebody’s attention to the existence of UCF. That’s PR.
Regarding Florida universities, I’d rather read a paper UD News cited a few years ago from an Italian computer scientist at UF who wrote something about the central dogma of biology. Does anybody have the link to that OP?
Bob @7:
You’ve got it backwards, Bob. Rather, all the Darwinists got together and came up with the Grand Unified Just-So Story that was just so right and true (in their minds) that this ultimate truth just had to propagate back in time to ignite the evolution of the Universe.
I suppose I should read 20 pages of impenetrable text to find out what I’m missing here, but all of my previous understanding was that the Big Bang was caused by COMPRESSION ALONE and, as with Hydrogen Bombs, once the first few atoms fuse to form Helium, there is then more than enough high temperature and high pressure to continue a chain reaction of helium formation. This is EXACTLY how Hydrogen gas clouds become STARS…
And, as with contemporary novas, great balls of super-heated (but not “burning”) Hydrogen and Helium will happily blow themselves to smithereens, a Little Bang?, scattering their guts across Space.
But without Oxygen, etc., H2 can’t “burn” in any normal chemical sense. So what purpose could a “flame” serve in the presence of a thermonuclear reaction?
Fastedious @ 9
Grand Unified doesn’t quite work. It’s more like Grand Swiss Cheese. No matter how many holes are poked into evolution, Darwinists remain standing firm. No matter how big the holes, they always seem to use circular reasoning to ignore what others see quite clearly. Although you’re probably closer to the truth than I am. For the Darwinists to use the portions of their brains to actually think, would more likely result in their own spontaneous combustion.