Intelligent Design science education

Move to deny accreditation to religious schools for “science” reasons

Spread the love

Even while a Harvard astronomer claims that space aliens visited in 2017 [HUH?], we are told of a new proposal that could deny accreditation to religious colleges based on science.

In its Blueprint for Positive Change 2020, the Human Rights Campaign proposes that the U.S. Department of Education in the next presidential administration adopt new regulations to “Ensure Nondiscrimination Policies and Science Based Curricula Are Not Undermined by Religious Exemptions to Accreditation Standards.” The document explains:

“Language regarding accreditation of religious institutions of higher education in the Higher Education Opportunity Act could be interpreted to require accrediting bodies to accredit religious institutions that discriminate or that do not meet science based curricula standards. The Department of Education should issue a regulation clarifying that this provision, which requires accreditation agencies to “respect the stated mission” of religious institutions, does not require the accreditation of religious institutions that do not meet neutral accreditation standards including nondiscrimination policies and scientific curriculum requirements. (emphasis added)”

If enacted, this proposal would open Pandora’s Box for new restrictions on free speech and academic freedom in the area of science. Many scientific claims have worldview implications, including scientific claims arising in the fields of cosmology, origin of life research, evolution, sexuality, medicine, human cloning, and neuroscience. As a result, science research can give rise to a host of disputed questions. Some of these questions are ethical—for example, is it moral to use fetal tissue from aborted human babies should in medical research? Other questions are factual: How much change can unguided natural selection actually produce? Are proposed materialistic explanations for the origin of the first life scientifically realistic?

John West, “New Proposal Could Deny Accreditation to Religious Colleges Based on “Science”” at Evolution News and Science Today

They may or may not be able to get away with it. But I don’t think we should delude ourselves that it has anything to do with science.

Fundamentally, religious colleges pose the same problem as charter schools: They often do a better job for less money than the bureaucracy-laden public systems. Inevitably, there is political pressure to get rid of them, especially as public systems are likely to become ever more loaded down with bureaucratic initiatives – for example, the war on math, which mainly benefits people with teaching certificates who cannot teach.

See also: Harvard Astronomer: Aliens visited in 2017! Now a book! Okay, Oumuamua is unusual. But here’s what seems even more unusual. That a Harvard astronomer would be retailing stories that, sixty years ago, were the domain of tabloid magazines. And people are listening seriously.

8 Replies to “Move to deny accreditation to religious schools for “science” reasons

  1. 1
    Pearlman says:

    perhaps decertify public schools, and teachers in the main teachers union/s, that still teach failed NDT Darwinisn hypothesis, morphed into a religous like belief, as a science. In violation of the establishment clause.

  2. 2
    polistra says:

    Accrediting agencies have been playing this game for a long time. There’s always a workaround. Engineering schools have worked around the fashionable administrations for many years, developing their own alternative NON-QUANTUM physics courses and their own alternative NON-WOKE English courses in practical writing. There’s room for maneuver in these situations if the school is clever enough and courageous enough.

  3. 3
    ET says:

    I agree with pearlman @ 1

  4. 4
    mahuna says:

    A HUGE chunk of the knowledge and wisdom of Western Civilization comes DIRECTLY from Roman Catholic clergy. In fact, for CENTURIES the ONLY people who were both literate and concerned with the effect of Knowledge on Society were Catholic bishops and monks. (I note in passing that an AMAZING majority of these bishops and monks were IRISH…).
    If you exclude Catholic (both Roman and Greek) monks as sources of Western Thought, then you’re stuck with a huge VOID, that lasts at least 1,000 years.
    And if you INSIST on living in a world where Catholicism was NOT a major source of Philosophy, then you can NEVER understand the world we live in. Protestant Christians of course showed up VERY late in the game and frittered around the edges. Atheists showed up REALLY really late and gave us Bolshevism.

  5. 5
    Battman says:

    If “Science based curricula standards” means eliminating accreditation for all institutions of higher education to “ensure nondiscrimination” then before we end up with Obamacare funding only St. Darwin’s hospitals where only the fit survive, they should revoke the accreditation of any school for teaching Darwinism and Physicalism. Natural selection cannot select anything that doesn’t already exist and the only tool left in the shed for Physicalism/Naturalism/Materialism to account
    for the arrival of the fittest is its god-of-the-gaps, Chance.

    Failing that, we’ll have to establish Even Higher Education as a replacement for our indoctrination centers. Now that would be progress.

  6. 6
    JVL says:

    Mahuna: A HUGE chunk of the knowledge and wisdom of Western Civilization comes DIRECTLY from Roman Catholic clergy. In fact, for CENTURIES the ONLY people who were both literate and concerned with the effect of Knowledge on Society were Catholic bishops and monks.

    Completely ignoring the contributions made by Islamic scholars of course.

  7. 7
    bornagain77 says:

    And now the left wing’s attack on private Christian Schools begins even before Biden officially takes office.

    This is a crying shame. The education in Public Schools is a joke compared to private Christian Schools. And now they want to bring the same extremely low standard of education that is in the public school systems to private Christian schools?

    If anything, Public Schools need far more Christian principles in their curriculum, so as to raise the quality of their education, than Christian Schools ever need more secular principles in their curriculum.

    For instance, I firmly believe that the demise of the public school education system started way back in 1963 with the removal of prayer from public schools.

    The Devastating Effects When Prayer Was Removed From School in America in 1962-63 – David Barton – video
    (excerpted from Barton’s “America’s Godly Heritage’ lecture)
    https://youtu.be/1No–GpdqCY

    What Happened When the Praying Stopped? April 6, 2008
    Excerpt: How did the removal of voluntary prayer from the schools of the United States (in 1963) affect our nation as a whole?,,,
    Figure 1 shows how drastically the actual knowledge of high school students began to drop at an accelerating rate after 1962. Barton notes in his report that the upturn in SAT scores since 1981 is due to the increase in private Christian educational facilities which began to flourish at that time. Statistics have proven that students from private Christian schools showed higher academic achievement and higher test scores.

    Figure 2: This graph shows the increase in sexual activity in unmarried teen-age girls after the 1962 Supreme Court decision. It is evident from the figures provided that in the years previous to the removal of prayer the rates remained stable and relatively unchanged. In the post- prayer years the numbers immediately began to soar. The sudden increase on the graph appears as if a great restraining force had suddenly been removed.

    Figure 3: Unwed women 15-19 years of age showed a phenomenal increase in the rate of pregnancies after the School Prayer decision. Note that the figure jumps drastically after the Supreme Court’s Roe vs. Wade decision which made abortion legal in the U.S. The United States now has the highest incidence of teen-age motherhood in any Western country.

    Figure 4: For the 15-19 and 20-24 age group, the rates of youth suicide remained relatively unchanged during the years from 1946 to the School Prayer decision in 1962. But in the years since, suicides among the same group have increased 253 percent, or an average of 10.5 percent per year.

    Figure 5: Stability in the family has also been affected since the 1962 decision. Divorce, single parent families, couples living together but not married, and adultery are areas of family breakdown which have experienced radical growth in recent years. In the graph above, the increase in single parent families (households with only a mother and children) are detailed. Note the dotted line at the bottom, which shows the rate of growth prior to the 1962 decision.

    Figure 6: Crime, productivity, and national morality had been on a fairly stable level prior to the 1962 decision, but that is no longer the case. It is obvious that such a quantity of students praying for their nation had a very positive effect on the course that this nation had taken. The rate of violent crime, as shown above, has risen over 330 percent.
    http://www.forerunner.com/fore.....opped.html

    If anyone doubts those sobering numbers cited by David Barton, here is the raw data on crime statistics for America from 1960 to 2019:

    United States Crime Rates 1960 – 2019 (Please note the skyrocketing crime rate from 1963, the year prayer was removed from school, thru 1980, the year the steep climb in crime rate finally leveled off.) of note: The slight decline in the violent crime rate at the mid 90s is attributed in large part to tougher enforcement on minor crimes (i.e. New York’s ‘spitting on the sidewalk’ enforcement).
    http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

    And if anyone doubts that SAT scores dropped substantially after the removal of prayer from school in 1963, wikipedia itself states that,

    SAT
    Excerpt: In 1952, mean verbal and math scores were 476 and 494, respectively, and scores were generally stable in the 1950s and early 1960s. However, starting in the mid-1960s and continuing until the early 1980s, SAT scores declined: the average verbal score dropped by about 50 points, and the average math score fell by about 30 points. By the late 1970s, only the upper third of test takers were doing as well as the upper half of those taking the SAT in 1963.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#1960s_and_1970s_score_declines

    On the other hand, and as David Barton pointed out in his lecture, the SAT scores for private Christian schools have consistently remained at the top, or near the top, spot in the world.,,, Consistently outperforming public schools, i.e. “college-bound seniors in religious and independent schools scoring substantially higher than the national average.”

    2018 SAT Results Released
    The College Board recently released performance results from the SAT for the class of 2018. According to the College Board, the mean total scores for 2018 graduates who took the SAT was 1068, a slight increase over last year’s class average of 1060. For the Evidence-Based Reading and Writing section (ERW), the mean score was 536, whereas last year’s was 533. The Math section score was 531, just above 2017’s 527.
    Private School Data
    According to data provided to CAPE by the College Board, results varied significantly by the type of school students attended, with college-bound seniors in religious and independent schools scoring substantially higher than the national average. Specifically, the average combined score of students in independent schools was 1188, or 120 points above the national mean, while the average for religious school students was 1153, which was 85 points above the mean. Public school students scored 1049, 19 points below the mean. The scores make clear that students in private schools help lift the national average.
    https://www.lcs.education/4198-2/

    And this following 2018 study from Stanford found that, “Adolescents who practice religion on a regular basis do better in school than those who are religiously disengaged,,”

    Religiously engaged adolescents demonstrate habits that help them get better grades, Stanford scholar finds – April 15, 2018
    Excerpt: Adolescents who practice religion on a regular basis do better in school than those who are religiously disengaged, according to new research from Stanford Graduate School of Education (GSE).,,,
    The link between religiosity and grades remained after accounting for race, class, gender and religious denomination, Horwitz said. It also held after controlling for certain behaviors associated with strict religious practice among teenagers, like lower alcohol consumption and limited sexual activity.
    “Generally, kids who are religious drink less, have less sex, and are more closely supervised by their parents,” said Horwitz. “These variables explained some of why religious kids do better in school. But my models showed there’s something above and beyond those factors that the survey data couldn’t explain.”
    https://ed.stanford.edu/news/religiously-engaged-adolescents-demonstrate-habits-help-them-get-better-grades-stanford-scholar?newsletter=true

    Verse:

    John 13:13
    “You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and rightly so, for that is what I am.”

    So, since prayer and/or religious belief is obviously very beneficial to a child’s education, why in the world was prayer ever removed from public schools in the first place?

    Well, once again, we have our so-called progressive liberal friends on the left to thank for turning America’s public schools into the second, even third, rate educational institutions that they are now..

    Specifically, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, an appointee of FDR, and a former leader of the KKK, is largely responsible for inventing the false doctrine ‘separation of church and state’,,,

    Hugo Black and the real history of “the wall of separation between church and state” – 2011
    Excerpt: So how does this invocation of “wall of separation between church and state” become Supreme Court doctrine, extending from a casual phrase by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to an obscure comment in an 1878 Supreme Court ruling on bigamy to a pervasive doctrine of anti-religious censorship in the public square in the 21st century?
    Here’s how:
    On August 11, 1921 Fr. James Coyle, a Roman Catholic priest in Birmingham, Alabama, was shot to death on the porch of his rectory by E.R. Stephensen, a local Ku Klux Klansman. Fr. Coyle had just performed a wedding between Stephensen’s daughter and her Puerto Rican husband.
    Stephenson was defended by five lawyers, four of whom were Klan members. The fifth lawyer who volunteered to defend Stephenson was Hugo Black, a prominent local attorney. Despite the fact that the Catholic priest was unarmed and the murder was committed in public in front of witnesses, Stephensen was acquitted of murder based on “self-defense”and “temporary insanity”.
    Defense attorney Black joined the Ku Klux Klan after the trial. In the Klan, Black was a Kladd of the Klavern, which was an initiator of new Klansmen.
    From The Volokh Conspiracy:
    … Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”… Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed…
    Several years later, Black ran for U.S. Senate from Alabama. He barnstormed the state, campaigning on a virulent anti-Catholic platform and demanding “a wall of separation between church and state”. His strongest support came from his Klan base, and he gave many anti-Catholic “wall of separation” speeches to Klan meetings across Alabama.
    Black, a Democrat, won the Alabama senate seat in 1926, defeating his Republican opponent with 80.9 % of the vote. He easily won re-election in 1932, with 86.3 % of the vote. He was a staunch defender of FDR’s New Deal and of Roosevelt’s court-packing plan.
    In 1937 Roosevelt appointed Black to the Supreme Court. Despite controversy about his Klan history, Black was easily confirmed. He quickly acquired a reputation for idiosyncratic interpretation of the Constitution.
    In 1947, Justice Hugo Black wrote the majority opinion in Everson v. Board of Education, the landmark Establishment Clause Supreme Court decision that barred use of tax revenues to transport children to religious (Catholic) schools.
    Justice Black wrote:
    No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between Church and State.’” 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 [emphasis mine]
    In 1962, Justice Hugo Black wrote the majority opinion in Engel v. Vitale, the landmark Establishment Clause Supreme Court decision that outlawed prayer in public schools.
    Justice Black wrote:
    The petitioners contend among other things that the state laws requiring or permitting use of the Regents’ prayer must be struck down as a violation of the Establishment Clause because that prayer was composed by governmental officials as a part of a governmental program to further religious beliefs. For this reason, petitioners argue, the State’s use of the Regents’ prayer in its public school system breaches the constitutional wall of separation between Church and State. We agree with that contention since we think that the constitutional prohibition against laws respecting an establishment of religion must at least mean that in this country it is no part of the business of government to compose official prayers for any group of the American people to recite as a part of a religious program carried on by government. [emphasis mine]
    Justice Hugo Black began his political career in the wake of his successful defense of a Klansman who murdered a Catholic priest. The modern application of the non-Constitutional doctrine “a wall of separation between church and state” derives from Black, a former Kladd of the Klavern of the Alabama Ku Klux Klan, who used his Klan base to secure a Senate seat and ultimately an appointment on the Supreme Court.
    The phrase “a wall of separation between church and state” played little role in jurisprudence until the mid-20th century. The doctrine has long played a large cultural role, preserved by pervasive anti-Catholic bigotry through organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan, and became a ‘Constitutional principle’ through the jurisprudence of an anti-Catholic bigot. It is used today to suppress prayer and religious expression in all public schools in the United States.
    Why is it that discussions of the “separation of church and state” don’t generally include the cultural and political history of the “doctrine”? Why is the central role that “separation” played in the political and judicial rise of Justice Black– the father of modern Establishment Clause jurisprudence– never seems to show up in New York Times Op-Ed columns or NPR’s “All Things Considered”? Ever see a press release by Americans United for Separation of Church and State note the fact that “an eternal separation of church and state” was a part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda and the Klansmen’s Creed, and that one of those Klansmen jurists wrote the Supreme Court opinions establishing “separation of church and state” as the law under which we live?
    http://egnorance.blogspot.com/…..ll-of.html

    In fact, the term ‘separation of church and state’ does not even appear anywhere in the constitution but is a term that was lifted out of context from one of Jefferson’s personal letters to the Danbury Baptists, and then twisted almost 180 degrees out of its original context. The term ‘separation of church and state’, as Jefferson originally intended it, meant that the Danbury Baptists could rest assured that they were free to exercise their religion as they saw fit, completely free from any government interference. I.e. The first amendment was originally devised to protect the church from the state’s influence, not to protect the state from the church’s influence.

    The Truth About “Separation of Church and State”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS6QGyWVgZY

    Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists – January 1, 1802
    Excerpt: Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black (a former KKK member),, in 1947, put forth the,, argument for a radical separation of religion and politics, he cited Jefferson’s metaphor: “[t]he First Amendment has erected a wall of separation between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable.”
    Jefferson’s actual aim was quite to the contrary.,,,
    The “wall” does not imprison the free exercise of religion. Rather, Jefferson sought to prevent the domination of particular sects, making free the religious practices of all.
    – per heritage

    Thus in conclusion, the left’s decades long ‘war on Christianity’ has had a devastating impact on the quality of education (and morality) of children who are forced to endure the public school education system.

    Colossians 2
    Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.
    I say this so that no one may deceive you by specious arguments.

  8. 8
    AaronS1978 says:

    Well Richard Dawkins had said that Islam had made no real scientific contribution in 500 years if I’m not mistaken

    I think his opinion is very valid and is very understanding and open minded since he is a liberal

Leave a Reply