What are the central theological failings of intelligent design? First, it is blasphemous.
Peter Hess, Faith Project Director, NCSE
In an ironic twist, Darwinist Atheist Jason Rosenhouse takes Darwinist Theologian Peter Hess to task here: Is ID Blasphemous (Rosenhouse). Rosenhouse concludes that ID is “not blasphemous”.
David Heddle then provides some modification Rosenhouse’s arguments in Comment 20, and also agrees that ID is not blasphemous
The NCSE’s Hess is wrong. Rosenhouse agrees. Heddle agrees. I agree. Wow! Or to quote PZ Myers:
The NCSE is lying.
HT: Mike Gene