Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

One step at a time: Motor molecules use random walks to make deliveries in living cells

Categories
Intelligent Design
Irreducible Complexity
Science
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Physorg.com – July 21st, 2009

Cells rely on tiny molecular motors to deliver cargo, such as mRNA and organelles, within the cell. The critical nature of this transport system is evidenced by the fact that disruption of motors by genetic defects leads to fatal diseases in humans. Although investigators have isolated these motor to study their function in a controlled environment outside the cell, it has been difficult for researchers to follow these fascinating molecular transporters in their natural environment, the living cell.

Now, two articles published by Cell Press in , make use of incredibly tiny, glowing “quantum dots” to track the miniscule motions of myosin V in living cells. Interestingly, both research groups independently report that myosin V molecules carry their quantum dot cargo either in a straight line or in a manner akin to a drunken walk.

Myosin V is a motor molecule that “walks” in a fashion similar to humans by stepping along actin filament tracks that are assembled in a dense, criss-crossing network inside the cell. A critical feature of these motors is their ability to walk long distances without falling off their tracks. However, this has never been observed within cells. Through the binding of quantum dots directly to a single myosin V molecule, both investigative teams used sophisticated microscopes and sensitive cameras to witness the 72 nanometer strides (equivalent to 1 millionth of an inch) taken by these motors for the first time in cells.

Read More…

Here is my favorite line: “Cargo delivery in cells can’t totally be a random process, therefore, using the approach described here we can characterize how motors and cargo link up and understand the engineering design principles Mother Nature uses to guarantee efficient and effective delivery of cargo within cells,” offers Dr. Warshaw.   [italics mine]

Comments
Before someone brings up evolutionary algorithms: EV Ware: Dissection of a Digital Organism: Ev purports to show "how life gains information." Specifically "that biological information... can rapidly appear in genetic control systems subjected to replication, mutation and selection." [Yet] It is the active information introduced by the computer programmer and not the evolutionary program that reduced the difficulty of the problem to a manageable level. http://www.evoinfo.org/Resources/EvWare/index.html Another quote: "The manuals needed for building the entire space shuttle and all its components and all its support systems would be truly enormous! Yet the specified complexity (information) of even the simplest form of life - a bacterium - is arguably as great as that of the space shuttle." J.C. Sanford - Geneticist Inner Life Of A Cell - A small glimpse at the complexity of a cell - video http://multimedia.mcb.harvard.edu/bornagain77
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
09:05 AM
9
09
05
AM
PST
"No man-made program comes close to the technical brilliance of even Mycoplasmal genetic algorithms. Mycoplasmas are the simplest known organism with the smallest known genome, to date. How was its genome and other living organisms' genomes programmed?" - David L. Abel and Jack T. Trevors, “Three Subsets of Sequence Complexity and Their Relevance to Biopolymeric Information,” Theoretical Biology & Medical Modelling, Vol. 2, 11 August 2005, page 8 Ben Stein - EXPELLED - The Complexity of the Cell - video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yibucli2drc "We have always underestimated cells. Undoubtedly we still do today....We can walk and we can talk because the chemistry that makes life possible is much more elaborate and sophisticated than anything we students had ever considered...Instead of a cell dominated by randomly colliding individual protein molecules. we now know that nearly every major process in a cell is carried out by assemblies of 10 or more protein molecules. And, as it carries out its biological functions, each of these protein assemblies interacts with several other large complexes of proteins. Indeed, the entire cell can be viewed as a factory that contains an elaborate network of interlocking assembly lines, each which is composed of a set of large protein machines." Bruce Alberts: Former President, National Academy of Sciences; The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines “Each cell with genetic information, from bacteria to man, consists of artificial languages and their decoding systems, memory banks for information storage and retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the automated assembly of parts and components, error fail-safe and proof-reading devices utilized for quality control, assembly processes involving the principle of prefabrication and modular construction and a capacity not equaled in any of our most advanced machines, for it would be capable of replicating its entire structure within a matter of a few hours" Geneticist Michael Denton PhD. "... no operation performed by a computer can create new information." Douglas G. Robertson, "Algorithmic Information Theory, Free Will and the Turing Test," Complexity, Vol.3, #3 Jan/Feb 1999, pp. 25-34. The Evolutionary Informatics Lab: Stephen C. Meyer - Signature In The Cell: "DNA functions like a software program," "We know from experience that software comes from programmers. Information--whether inscribed in hieroglyphics, written in a book or encoded in a radio signal--always arises from an intelligent source. So the discovery of digital code in DNA provides evidence that the information in DNA also had an intelligent source." http://www.evolutionnews.org/2009/07/leading_advocate_of_intelligen.htmlbornagain77
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
08:59 AM
8
08
59
AM
PST
Clearly the structure and operation of a cell conform to its function. So in that sense what happens in a cell is certainly not random. But I still don't see what that has to do with the issue of evolution versus design. Why must lack of randomness necessarily imply design? I wouldn't say I have my head in the sand. I am here reading this blog, aren't I? But it seems that some of you are saying that the existence of a designer is intuitively obvious, and it doesn't seem obvious to me at all. Besides doesn't that just move the problem up a level? Aren't we then left with questions of the origins of the designer, not to mention a question as to the physical mechanism by which the designer created life and developed the species?Pendragon
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
08:53 AM
8
08
53
AM
PST
Pendragon, is your head comfortable in all that sand? Metaphor? No, design just happens to be the most succinct and accurate description of empirically and repeatedly observed phenomenon. But no worries, mate; hand-waving and a nice sandy spot to lay one's head does wonders when one wishes to avoid the blatantly obvious.Brent
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
08:12 AM
8
08
12
AM
PST
Pendragon, It also strikes me as extremely disingenuous to continually deny the white elephant of design in the room. There is absolutely nada that is random or undirected in anything that happens in the cell. It reeks of design. It is irrational to declare the word design to be a metaphor to explain the supposed 'appearance' of design. No, there's no metaphor being used here. ....just another hole in the wall.Oramus
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
08:02 AM
8
08
02
AM
PST
It strikes me as cheap to exploit what is clearly a metaphorical reference to "design." I also don't see how this article supports "intelligent design." It simply describes a particular aspect of cell function.Pendragon
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
06:27 AM
6
06
27
AM
PST
Truly amazing finding. But alas now mother nature is the designer/engineer in their eyes. Here is a video on how myosin activates each "step": myosin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ9ffKeUCvEbornagain77
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
04:01 AM
4
04
01
AM
PST
Mario, Interesting research. And I add this sentence just above your quote... "Their findings, published in the July 22nd 2009 issue of the journal, suggested that myosin V's apparent drunken walk is in fact the motor taking turns at almost every intersection it encounters along the dense and randomly oriented intracellular actin highway. So, it is advancing through turns along the highway. The "motor" is doing this. How does it know where to go? What gives it direction to its final destination? I'm wondering if this is not random oriented highway, but a sequence of highly regulated turns to the final destination area for cargo exchange. Good to know "mother nature is such a good engineer. That totally blows my image of her: Mother Nature - Tree Lover... Magical Momma I never thought of her as an engineer, hmmmm.... in fact, I kinda thought she was a Hippy at heart... smoke a little mary jane and tune out, turn on and dig nature man. Funny how the actual discovery of this has nothing to do with evolution at all, just science figuring out out how things work at the nano-level, where nano-engineers may one day learn how the lattice guides the "motors" turns on the highway of intracellular travel. I wonder if there are not guiding lines like we have on our highways with specific lanes that the motors stay in due to weak atomic forces. It is very interesting because the motor must first take a step, then release or be released and take another step. So, maybe it is a work of repelling(forcing the step away from certain matrices) as much as attraction to other matrix positions. But then, how does the release mechamism work? I'm curious to read both papers.DATCG
July 22, 2009
July
07
Jul
22
22
2009
12:10 AM
12
12
10
AM
PST
1 2