Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Overlapping genetic code is … stories embedded in stories, using the exact same words?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

And not even just a different story read backwards, like I thought?

Liberty University biology prof David A. DeWitt, author of Unraveling the Origins Controversy, commented on my characterization of the overlapping codes of the genome. Seeing that Christianity Today is actually taking BioLogos and yesterday’s science seriously, I had written,

A friend, a faithful Christian in science, was dismayed by the story. He is an information theorist. … The genome, to take one small point, is full over overlapping codes. (It’s as if a short story read backwards is a flawless different short story, and sections of it, read letter by letter down the right hand side are a flawless paragraph.)

and DeWitt replies,

In the mitochondrial genome the overlapping codes are for different subunits of the same protein complex (ATP Synthase). So it is not even that “backwards is a flawless different short story” it is another volume in a series of short stories involving the same characters!

which all happened, of course, merely by the magic of Darwin’s natural selection acting on random mutations. But presumably Christian Darwinists are free to dress it their unbelievable scenario in God talk as long as they feel like it.  Only, 

BioLogos: Yesterday’s science as if reality didn’t matter.

Christianity Today: News coverage for Christians as if trashing our heritage and grovelling to yesterday’s science will make people stop hating serious Christians.

Yoo hoo!! Is anyone else out there sick of that whole narrative? Looking for solutions?

Read Uncommon Descent. We make it our business to tell you what is really happening because we cannot afford not to know, in the way that institutional Christian media can. We don’t even think of ourselves as Christian media. It’s true that the whole slate of list guvs here are trad Christians, but that’s just how we found each other.

What should mater to you is, we are united in thinking that you deserve news as if you and reality mattered.

Comments
I find this comment from ENV's lead article to be very interesting: from Matthew; I'm a working biologist, on bacterial regulation (transcription and translation and protein stability) through signalling molecules, so I guess I have a different approach to this article that most would. And yet I can confirm the following points as realities: we lack adequate conceptual categories for what we are seeing in the biological world; with many additional genomes sequenced annually, we have much more data than we know what to do with (and making sense of it has become the current challenge); cells are staggeringly chock full of sophisticated technologies, which are exquisitely integrated; life is not dominated by a single technology, but rather a composite of many; and yet life is more than the sum of its parts; in our work, we biologists use words that imply intentionality, functionality, strategy, and design in biology--we simply cannot avoid them. Furthermore, I suggest that to maintain that all of biology is solely a product of selection and genetic decay and time requires a metaphysical conviction that isn't troubled by the evidence. Alternatively, it could be the view of someone who is unfamiliar with the evidence, for one reason or another. But for those who will consider the evidence that is so obvious throughout biology, I suggest it's high time we moved on. http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/06/life_purpose_mind_where_the_ma046991.html#comment-8858161bornagain77
June 3, 2011
June
06
Jun
3
03
2011
03:48 PM
3
03
48
PM
PDT
Do you know how hard it is to interweave code like that in a memory? I never even tried that trick!kairosfocus
June 3, 2011
June
06
Jun
3
03
2011
02:32 PM
2
02
32
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply