Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Physicist David Snoke reviews Shadows of Oz, on theistic evolution

arroba Email

At Christian Scientific Society, here:

Shadow of Oz, by Wayne Rossiter (Wipf and Stock, 2015) does something that should have been done a long time ago: it takes a direct and critical look at the theology of theistic evolution. Often the debate over intelligent design (ID) has been cast in terms of questioning the theological premises of ID, e.g., accusations of god-of-the-gaps, God making things up ad hoc, etc., but the shoe can be on the other foot: do theistic evolutionists have a coherent theology? Wayne Rossiter takes a close, often iconoclastic, look at the theological beliefs of major theistic evolutionists such as Kenneth Miller, Karl Giberson, Francis Collins, and John Polkinghorne. More.

From the publisher: Shadow of Oz: Theistic Evolution and the Absent God:

In the century and a half since Darwin’s Origin of Species, there has been an ongoing–and often vociferously argued–conversation about our species’ place in creation and its relationship to a Creator. A growing number of academic professionals see no conflict between Darwin’s view of life and the Christian faith. Dubbed “theistic evolution” this brand of Christianity holds that God has used processes like Darwinian evolution to achieve his creation. But is that true? Can Darwin’s mechanism of natural selection acting on chance mutations be reconciled with God’s intentionality in producing particular outcomes? Does humanity represent the apex of his creation, or just an erasable and ephemeral signpost along a path still being revealed? Does theistic evolution permit God to intervene supernaturally in the workings of his creation? Can we as humans be made in the image of God if we are just one of the millions of products of evolution? Can we salvage concepts like freewill, meaning, purpose, or an eternal soul within theistic evolution? In this book, Wayne Rossiter assess theistic evolution, and whether or not it is consistent with Christianity and secular science. His conclusion is that it bears little resemblance to classical Christianity, and promotes a century-old understanding of evolutionary theory. Theistic evolution renders God a passive player in creation, so far removed and undetectable that he resembles a mere shadow of the Creator described in Christianity.

Anyone else read it?

Evolutionism was always a attack upon Christian doctrines and lots of them. it was accepted by those who already rejected many doctrines like scriptures inerrancy and more. then it was accepted by thiose who reject christ as God etc and then those who reject God. Evolutionism claims to be right based on intellectual investigation of nature. Why do some persist in a god concept when rejecting Christian doctrines.? why is it plausible for a God being to exist but not for him to create? why not as the bible says? are these theistic evolutionists really that intelligent ? Hmmm. Robert Byers

Leave a Reply