PSSI Interview

Thanks Herb, been away from the computer for a while, thought I was gonna get a different type response. lamarck

lamarck,

You all can go to infowarsdotcom and read about the CIA’s hand in wikipedia. eric shmidt the ceo of google is a CFR member for example. If you advocate ID you’re going against a huge fabian socialist one world conspiracy, directed at the top by psychopaths who believe they’re channeling an extra-dimensional demon-god’s wishes.

An excellent source. I've been following Alex Jones for quite a while, mostly for his coverage of 9/11 stories. http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html herb

You all can go to infowarsdotcom and read about the CIA's hand in wikipedia. eric shmidt the ceo of google is a CFR member for example. If you advocate ID you're going against a huge fabian socialist one world conspiracy, directed at the top by psychopaths who believe they're channeling an extra-dimensional demon-god's wishes. Everyone below them working for them is compartmentalized out of the big picture. Kid's must not learn about any higher, non-material nature that man could possess. Hey someone's gotta tell it straight. lamarck

sorry about missing endquote... Cabal

as well as a complete disregard for critical thinking of ideas that suggest purpose in the universe

Frankly, I have not studied Wikipedia, but mention of blocokquote>the sections that are “criticism” of famous atheists’ theories makes me wonder: wouldn't it be more purposeful to criticize the scientific theory of evolution instead of 'famous atheist' theories? AFAIK, not even Darwin was an atheist? In my opinion, it matters less who presents a theory or what his religious belifes may be; what matters is how sound his theory may be. Ultimately, should not a scientist go where the evidence leads regardless of religious convictions? Ideas are a good thing, but personally, I would like something a little more tangible than 'suggestions of purpose in the universe'. Isn't there a gap between the idea of purpose, and observation of purposeful activity? There ought to be traces of such activity to be found, somewhere? Is it enough to say "I believe in purpose because that's what it looks like to me?" Cabal

One interesting link I noted on Wikipedia is their list of former atheists. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_atheists fmarotta

wikipedia - the most blatant proof of the censorship of Darwinists. the sections that are "criticism" of famous atheists' theories read like a defense of the atheists instead of a critique. if you try to edit something (that disagrees with materialism) it will be "corrected" within minutes. The hoard of wiki editors probably share a large cross-population with the hoard that patrol blogs such as Pharyngula, seeking out any dissent and eliminating it with a barage of ad hominem attacks, as well as a complete disregard for critical thinking of ideas that suggest purpose in the universe uoflcard