Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

PSSI Interview

William Dembski
June 10, 2009
Intelligent Design, Science
1
Categories
Intelligent Design
Science
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

At ID_The_Future Casey Luskin interviews Rich Akin from Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity. Dr. Akin shares why he founded this organization for ID-supporting doctors and the misinformation about his organization on Wikipedia. To listen as Dr. Akin explains more about PSSI International, go here.

Comments
Thanks Herb, been away from the computer for a while, thought I was gonna get a different type response.lamarck
June 17, 2009
June
06
Jun
17
17
2009
09:49 PM
9
09
49
PM
PDT
lamarck,
You all can go to infowarsdotcom and read about the CIA’s hand in wikipedia. eric shmidt the ceo of google is a CFR member for example. If you advocate ID you’re going against a huge fabian socialist one world conspiracy, directed at the top by psychopaths who believe they’re channeling an extra-dimensional demon-god’s wishes.
An excellent source. I've been following Alex Jones for quite a while, mostly for his coverage of 9/11 stories. http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.htmlherb
June 11, 2009
June
06
Jun
11
11
2009
08:43 PM
8
08
43
PM
PDT
You all can go to infowarsdotcom and read about the CIA's hand in wikipedia. eric shmidt the ceo of google is a CFR member for example. If you advocate ID you're going against a huge fabian socialist one world conspiracy, directed at the top by psychopaths who believe they're channeling an extra-dimensional demon-god's wishes. Everyone below them working for them is compartmentalized out of the big picture. Kid's must not learn about any higher, non-material nature that man could possess. Hey someone's gotta tell it straight.lamarck
June 11, 2009
June
06
Jun
11
11
2009
06:10 PM
6
06
10
PM
PDT
sorry about missing endquote...Cabal
June 11, 2009
June
06
Jun
11
11
2009
08:06 AM
8
08
06
AM
PDT
as well as a complete disregard for critical thinking of ideas that suggest purpose in the universe
Frankly, I have not studied Wikipedia, but mention of blocokquote>the sections that are “criticism” of famous atheists’ theories makes me wonder: wouldn't it be more purposeful to criticize the scientific theory of evolution instead of 'famous atheist' theories? AFAIK, not even Darwin was an atheist? In my opinion, it matters less who presents a theory or what his religious belifes may be; what matters is how sound his theory may be. Ultimately, should not a scientist go where the evidence leads regardless of religious convictions? Ideas are a good thing, but personally, I would like something a little more tangible than 'suggestions of purpose in the universe'. Isn't there a gap between the idea of purpose, and observation of purposeful activity? There ought to be traces of such activity to be found, somewhere? Is it enough to say "I believe in purpose because that's what it looks like to me?"Cabal
June 11, 2009
June
06
Jun
11
11
2009
08:05 AM
8
08
05
AM
PDT
One interesting link I noted on Wikipedia is their list of former atheists. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_atheistsfmarotta
June 11, 2009
June
06
Jun
11
11
2009
07:00 AM
7
07
00
AM
PDT
wikipedia - the most blatant proof of the censorship of Darwinists. the sections that are "criticism" of famous atheists' theories read like a defense of the atheists instead of a critique. if you try to edit something (that disagrees with materialism) it will be "corrected" within minutes. The hoard of wiki editors probably share a large cross-population with the hoard that patrol blogs such as Pharyngula, seeking out any dissent and eliminating it with a barage of ad hominem attacks, as well as a complete disregard for critical thinking of ideas that suggest purpose in the universeuoflcard
June 11, 2009
June
06
Jun
11
11
2009
05:11 AM
5
05
11
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply