Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

PZ Myers lets the facts and logic fend for themselves


“Seriously, aren’t atheists ashamed of P.Z. Myers, asks Reb Moshe Averick (the “maverick”rabbi and author of The Confused, Illusory World of the Atheist), for The Allgemeiner (May 29, 2011):

One of my mentors, Rabbi Yaakov Weinberg, (of blessed memory), made the following, rather sobering, observation about human nature: “Nobody ever allowed something as trivial as facts and logic to interfere with their agenda. If the facts and logic don’t fit, then the facts and logic will just have to fend for themselves.” Nowhere do we find more glaring examples of the human predilection for intellectual corruption than when we examine the writings and lectures of an ideologue who is driven, not by a burning desire for truth, but by a burning desire to further his or her own agenda.

Having said that, we are now ready to introduce one of the more zealous and outspoken (read: tiresome and obnoxious) advocates of the Darwinian/atheist worldview, P.Z. Myers. Dr. Myers is an associate professor of biology at the University of Minnesota-Morris, a satellite of the main state university, or as David Klinghoffer put it, “well known as the Harvard of Morris, Minnesota.” In a lecture at the Atheist International Alliance in 2009 (Burbank, Ca.) entitled Design vs. Chance, Myers administered, what he considered to be, a thorough thrashing of Intelligent Design theory. What actually transpired was a startlingly clear demonstration of the aforementioned principle set forth by Rabbi Weinberg; namely, that there is no simple fact or logical construct that will not be trampled into dust when it gets in the way of an agenda. I leave it to the readers to decide for themselves which of those options more closely mirrors reality.
Myers began by presenting a brisk summary of Intelligent Design theory: More here

This follows on an earlier post of his on the zoo atheists, a branch of the new atheists.

Why aren’t they ashamed? Some have suggested that it’s because they’d like to be Myers. But they don’t have tenure; they have bosses, wives, neighbours, etc. As in:

General consternation: Harvey said what? And did what? On YouTube? Has he started drinking again? Did he look like he’d been drinking?

semi OT: New Book Sheds Light on the "Dark Age": The Religion vs. Science Myth Exposed - Michael Flannery http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/05/the_dark_age_wasnt_that_dark_n046931.html bornagain77

Leave a Reply