Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Researchers: Pre-mammalian reptile evolved venom 100 million years before snakes

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
artist’s impression of Euchambersia/Wits University

From ScienceDaily: Euchambersia was a dog-sized pre-mammalian reptile living 260 million years ago in a deadly South African environment:

Living in the Karoo, near Colesberg in South Africa, the Euchambersia developed a deep and circular fossa, just behind its canine teeth in the upper jaw, in which a deadly venomous cocktail was produced, and delivered directly into the mouth through a fine network of bony grooves and canals.

“This is the first evidence of the oldest venomous vertebrate ever found, and what is even more surprising is that it is not in a species that we expected it to be, ” says Dr Julien Benoit, researcher at the Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa.

“Today, snakes are notorious for their venomous bite, but their fossil record vanishes in the depth of geological times at about 167 million years ago, so, at 260 million years ago, the Euchambersia evolved venom more than a 100 million years before the very first snake was even born. ” Paper. (public access) – Julien Benoit, Luke A. Norton, Paul R. Manger, Bruce S. Rubidge. Reappraisal of the envenoming capacity of Euchambersia mirabilis (Therapsida, Therocephalia) using μCT-scanning techniques. PLOS ONE, 2017; 12 (2): e0172047 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172047 More.

The venom, which probably flowed directly into the animal’s mouth, is thought to have been used primarily for hunting.

The fact that venom might be useful to the animal does not really explain how it comes to have it. But we are learning a lot about how complex mechanisms develop much earlier than thought.

See also: Evolution appears to converge on goals—but in Darwinian terms, is that possible?

and

Stasis: Life goes on but evolution does not happen

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
“You start with a random clump of atoms, and if you shine light on it for long enough, it should not be so surprising that you get a plant,” -- Prof Jeremy England M.I.T. (poof)Upright BiPed
March 4, 2017
March
03
Mar
4
04
2017
01:38 AM
1
01
38
AM
PDT
'O' and 'mahuna', your incredulity is noted. First, fossils are hard to make, they require the right conditions, and these conditions are rare, as noted by Charles Darwin in 1859, and earlier. So, the chances we will see a step by step transition in the evolution of venom, or anything, including the eye, is next to impossible.All we can do is record the physical evidence, DNA, etc and interpret. But here's the rub; they do exist. And they do require an explanation. I see 'mahuna' used the word 'poof' in his post. As an atheist I have to say that 'poof' is the word we use to describe your explanation. And 'poof' is a much more accurate description of IDers and creationist's motivation and (non)evidence too:'Let there be light',Poof!'And God made the firmament and divided the waters', Poof! 'And God said let the earth bring forth grass', Poof! Actually as you can see, this 'poof' thing works much more clearly as a device describing ID/Creationism.rvb8
March 3, 2017
March
03
Mar
3
03
2017
07:10 PM
7
07
10
PM
PDT
the Euchambersia developed a deep and circular fossa, just behind its canine teeth in the upper jaw, in which a deadly venomous cocktail was produced, and delivered directly into the mouth through a fine network of bony grooves and canals.
[sarc] It must be rather easy to describe a step-by-step evolution of such a feature. Here we go: The first step is a deep and circular fossa, just behind its canine teeth in the upper jaw, in which a deadly venomous cocktail is produced. Okay admittedly that's a difficult step wrt selection, the advantage for the animal is not obvious — further 'study' is required. Second the fine network of bony grooves and canals is selected for in order to get rid of the venom (that's logical!). And finally the system to control the whole thing is selected for (again pure logic!). And that's it, we're done.Tada! [sarc off]Origenes
March 3, 2017
March
03
Mar
3
03
2017
02:03 PM
2
02
03
PM
PDT
cutting edge CT scanning and 3D imagery techniques to analyse the only two fossilised skulls of the Euchambersia ever found
I think I'd rather see a pic of the skulls than an Artistic Impression. Andrewasauber
March 3, 2017
March
03
Mar
3
03
2017
01:48 PM
1
01
48
PM
PDT
artist’s impression
Yeah. There's that i word again. Andrewasauber
March 3, 2017
March
03
Mar
3
03
2017
01:31 PM
1
01
31
PM
PDT
Um, why no mention of the Gila Monster, which also lacks fangs and transfers poison by chewing? At 260 million BC, the venom, the creature's own immunity to that venom, and a system for transferring the venom all just appear POOF! without predecessors, and apparently without descendants? This sure sounds anything BUT "natural selection".mahuna
March 3, 2017
March
03
Mar
3
03
2017
01:10 PM
1
01
10
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply