Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Ribosome Checks for Translation Errors

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

There is a vast network of information flow in a typical cell, and along with that flow there is a vast network of error checking. Damage to DNA sequences is remedied, the transcribing of DNA is checked and corrected, and at the ribosome the translation process is checked and controlled. In fact, recent research has found that the ribosome not only carefully sets up the codon-to-amino-acid translation process for success, but if an error is made the ribosome detects it and takes action after the translation process.  Read more

Comments
Collin, Didn't you know about "their" trinity? Mother nature, Father Time and magical mystery mutations ;)Joseph
January 25, 2010
January
01
Jan
25
25
2010
04:27 PM
4
04
27
PM
PDT
Nakashima, "Darwinists are not going to be surprised by very high function after 3.5 billion years of evolution. Near optimal function is not automatically improbable." That almost sounds like an expression of faith. Almight Time, please bestow Thy blessings.Collin
January 25, 2010
January
01
Jan
25
25
2010
03:31 PM
3
03
31
PM
PDT
Mr Joseph, First, it is helpful to look at the original research paper referenced by Dr Hunter. Based on the error rates given in the paper, we can see that the ribosome is no great shakes at catching errors. Mutation rates in DNA are on the order of 10^-9 per base. Error rates in the ribosome can be on the order of 10^-3, which is a million times sloppier. If you read the paper, you can see that the mismatch of codon and anti-codon distorts the shape of part of the ribosome, even after it has released the AA. This is like mismatched gears, and it causes further and further errors to be made until finally the distorted shape of the whole ribosome causes the release factors to match something which isn't really a stop codon and this causes translation to stop. Will tighter tolerances in the ribosome lead to better reproduction and survival - yes. We would expect that there was an early period when ribosomes were even sloppier than they are now. Improving tolerances doesn't need foresight.Nakashima
January 25, 2010
January
01
Jan
25
25
2010
09:23 AM
9
09
23
AM
PDT
Nakashima-san, It's the origin of the function- ie the ARRIVAL - not survival- that is being questioned. To detect and correct errors you need to know what you are looking for and what to do once you find it.Joseph
January 25, 2010
January
01
Jan
25
25
2010
07:06 AM
7
07
06
AM
PDT
Mr Dodgen, How is it that Darwinists cannot recognize design in biology, when each new discovery bludgeons them over the head, ever more forcefully? Oart of the Darwinists problem may be a lack of clarity about whether optimality is an argument for design. Posts such as this by Dr Hunter seem to argue yes, but look over a few threads and Dr Tyler is arguing no about Rubisco. Darwinists are not going to be surprised by very high function after 3.5 billion years of evolution. Near optimal function is not automatically improbable.Nakashima
January 24, 2010
January
01
Jan
24
24
2010
04:54 PM
4
04
54
PM
PDT
The notion that this technology came about by random errors filtered by natural selection -- even with the most optimistic assumptions about the available probabilistic resources -- is simply absurd. An inference to design is so obvious that one must surely be in a state of self-imposed and pathological ignorance -- indeed, living in some kind of bizarre fantasy land -- about the reality that surrounds him. I'm perplexed and mystified. How is it that Darwinists cannot recognize design in biology, when each new discovery bludgeons them over the head, ever more forcefully? Perhaps repeated bludgeoning has turned their brains into mush.GilDodgen
January 24, 2010
January
01
Jan
24
24
2010
04:14 PM
4
04
14
PM
PDT
"the ribosome exerts far tighter quality control than anyone ever suspected." Isn't "quality control" a teleological term?Mung
January 23, 2010
January
01
Jan
23
23
2010
01:29 PM
1
01
29
PM
PDT
ribosome is a genetic compilerJoseph
January 23, 2010
January
01
Jan
23
23
2010
07:32 AM
7
07
32
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply