Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Salvo 19: Have some neuroscientists lost their minds?



During the Decade of the Brain (1990–2000), clinical neuroscience thrived. But pop neuroscience really took off after 2000. Brain scanners became increasingly available for non-medical research, including research into political views. Soon stories like these festooned the pop science media:

• “How facts backfire: Researchers discover a surprising threat to democracy: our brains”
• “Left brain, right brain: researchers link neurology to political orientation”
• “French government begins ‘neuropolicy'” (against smoking)
• “Hate Area of Brain Identified”
• “Political Science: What Being Neat or Messy Says about Political Leanings”
• “Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults”

Anything bother you about these themes? They leaked over onto the campaign trail. For example, neuropsychiatrist Louann Brizendine suggests that if voters were attracted to Sarah Palin as a candidate in 2008, it may have been because the “mirror neurons” in their brains were going “‘ding, ding, ding—this person is just like me.'” And another group of scientists suggest that voters who rated Hillary Clinton unfavorably on questionnaires were, according to their brain images, actually “battling unacknowledged impulses to like Mrs. Clinton.”


It seems evolutionism is once again being used to say these people or those are smarter. Didn't they say this about race/sex/me.? It seems if they can control the conclusions they don't mind listing brains and identity. Well everyone can say who they think is smarter. Yet if I did I think they would accuse me of 'isms-ism. People are made in the image of God. We think like God in framework. our thinking is unaffected by the natural world or our brain. Only the memory or stored thoughts affects us naturally. The rest is mumbo jumbo. Robert Byers

Leave a Reply