Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Science writers complain about online harassment

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

So people have noticed trolls?

Two points in response: 1. Perhaps many journalists have become more sensitive to disagreement? With all the woke nonsense about, "toxic environment", "micro-aggressions" and "triggering", maybe media people are more touchy these days? 2. Given that the mainstream media are largely to blame for the growing polarizations, they should look in the mirror, do some soul searching (if they have souls), and speak or write from a more balanced perspective, presenting all sides fairly. A prime example is how the media viscerally hated Donald Trump, from long before 2016, and then complained when he started dissing them.Fasteddious
No, seriously, it is a problem. But it is not a new one. And the solutions would include more freedom for dissent.
True. They're facing the release of a lot of bottled-up hostility. For a long time they never had to deal with anyone who disagreed with their spin on science news. Readers could try to get a letter published, maybe. But a lot of these journalists have been propagandists.Silver Asiatic
They should be happy to have ENGAGED listeners. The whole point of digital media is ENGAGEMENT, not paying for value. A non-paying ENGAGER is going to get nasty at times. The "journalists" wanted engagement. Now they're complaining that they got their wish. All parts of journalism are losing clickers fast because sane people are just goddamn tired of the whole game. Sane people are moving to subscription-based services because they want to be the customer, not the quality-controlled product.polistra
"as journalists in the United States and abroad have been increasingly subjected to online harassment" I hate to break it to "journalists" but they think they are Noble Cause Influencers, when they are mostly just dumb regurgitators who, IMO, mostly out of touch with using their brains. Andrewasauber
Have something to say?

FOR THE PAST several years, we’ve watched with rising concern as journalists in the United States and abroad have been increasingly subjected to online harassment. As journalism professors specializing in science reporting and violence against the press at George Washington University, we have researched, observed, and written about the rising trend in anti-press attacks through email, instant messages, social media, and other digital channels. Sadly, online attacks and threats have become the new normal in many newsrooms, with the result being that journalists are subject to a form of mob censorship. [So they are finally experiencing the culture they helped create?] Late last year, we began conducting a series of in-depth interviews — ten in total — to learn specifically how online harassment is affecting journalists who cover science. We spoke with science journalists and editors, asking them about the types of digital attacks they have received, as well as the content of those attacks, among other questions. Because these interviews were done as part of a research study, we’ve kept the names confidential in accordance with rules governing research with human subjects. In aggregate, the story they told was disheartening: Like journalists who cover politics and other polarizing beats, science journalists say they are being targeted with digital provocations and hate, and report their newsrooms are doing little, if anything, to protect them. [Most people who suffered from this were not so protected but it sounds like a good idea. ] We spoke with reporters who said they repeatedly received harassing phone calls from readers. In some cases, scary, accusatory messages would arrive by the hundreds on Twitter, Instagram, and by email. Women appeared to bear the brunt of these attacks. [Um, some of us are well aware of that too… ]

Lisa Palmer & Silvio Waisbord, “Trolling Is Taking a Toll on Science Journalism” at Undark (May 5, 2022)

If the science journalists want to run a test: Just try claiming that the universe shows evidence of design. And defend yourselves against the trolls.

Otherwise, cry the rest of us a river.

No, seriously, it is a problem. But it is not a new one. And the solutions would include more freedom for dissent.

Comments
Two points in response: 1. Perhaps many journalists have become more sensitive to disagreement? With all the woke nonsense about, "toxic environment", "micro-aggressions" and "triggering", maybe media people are more touchy these days? 2. Given that the mainstream media are largely to blame for the growing polarizations, they should look in the mirror, do some soul searching (if they have souls), and speak or write from a more balanced perspective, presenting all sides fairly. A prime example is how the media viscerally hated Donald Trump, from long before 2016, and then complained when he started dissing them.Fasteddious
May 6, 2022
May
05
May
6
06
2022
09:27 AM
9
09
27
AM
PDT
No, seriously, it is a problem. But it is not a new one. And the solutions would include more freedom for dissent.
True. They're facing the release of a lot of bottled-up hostility. For a long time they never had to deal with anyone who disagreed with their spin on science news. Readers could try to get a letter published, maybe. But a lot of these journalists have been propagandists.Silver Asiatic
May 6, 2022
May
05
May
6
06
2022
08:50 AM
8
08
50
AM
PDT
They should be happy to have ENGAGED listeners. The whole point of digital media is ENGAGEMENT, not paying for value. A non-paying ENGAGER is going to get nasty at times. The "journalists" wanted engagement. Now they're complaining that they got their wish. All parts of journalism are losing clickers fast because sane people are just goddamn tired of the whole game. Sane people are moving to subscription-based services because they want to be the customer, not the quality-controlled product.polistra
May 6, 2022
May
05
May
6
06
2022
07:27 AM
7
07
27
AM
PDT
"as journalists in the United States and abroad have been increasingly subjected to online harassment" I hate to break it to "journalists" but they think they are Noble Cause Influencers, when they are mostly just dumb regurgitators who, IMO, mostly out of touch with using their brains. Andrewasauber
May 6, 2022
May
05
May
6
06
2022
07:19 AM
7
07
19
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply