Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Sheffield University: Darwin ruled “problematic” figure due to racism

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Had to happen:

A university has been slammed by academics for putting Charles Darwin on a list of ‘racist’ scientists as part of a guide to ‘decolonise’ its biology curriculum.

Sheffield University has created a handbook for students and lecturers in its science department to help ‘tackle racial injustice’ by ‘reflecting on the whiteness and Eurocentrism of our science’.

As part of the guide, the department created a list of 11 ‘problematic’ scientific figures – including Darwin – whose views ‘influenced the type of research they carried out and how they interpreted their data’.

William Cole, “Sheffield University tells staff Charles Darwin was ‘racist’ and used natural selection theory to justify white male superiority in ‘decolonising curriculum’ lecturing handbook” at Daily Mail

Author William Cole emphasizes Darwin’s opposition to slavery but one of his quoted experts puts that in perspective: “Professor James Moore, a biographer of Darwin, told The Telegraph: ‘Almost everyone in Darwin’s day was “racist” in 21st century terms, not only scientists and naturalists but even anti-slavery campaigners and abolitionists.”

Of course. There’s no reason why a racist couldn’t also be a passionate abolitionist. Whatever a person may believe about human equality, slavery is a corrupting influence on any society.

A wiser approach to fighting back would be to pry Woke administrators and faculty loose from employment, wherever possible. Choosing between them and civilization should not be difficult.

The article provides a whole list of non-woke historically significant scientists about to be subjected to whatever the Woke have in store for them, mostly post-mortem. That should be an incentive.

Hat tip: Ken Francis, co-author with Theodore Dalrymple of The Terror of Existence: From Ecclesiastes to Theatre of the Absurd

Comments
Silver Asiatic: Margaret Sanger was not just a random individual I cited nor even the leader of something from the past. She is the founder of Planned Parenthood – one of the most well-funded and influential organizations in the world today. There are some prominent black leaders today who know quite clearly that Planned Parenthood attempted to destroy black families and that effort persists. Your comment is inherently contradictory: you assume that many, many people are unaware of a particular stance or effect of Planned Parenthood (your assertion) but then you also assume that that agenda of Planned Parenthood is widespread and supported. Perhaps instead of picking particular people and organisations you find destructive and then ascribing support for them by others on roughly the same side of the political landscape you might find it more honest and insightful to actually get to know individuals and see what they actually support and believe. Just like you would like to be treated yourself.JVL
May 14, 2021
May
05
May
14
14
2021
07:12 AM
7
07
12
AM
PDT
Querius: If you think your rhetorical assertions are relevant, why don’t you answer your own questions–maybe do a little research on U.S. history first. I already asked you if you thought Eisenhower was a leftist, and now that you’ve provided a definition that apparently satisfies you, take a shot at why you think he was. I think it's clear that a lot of support for racist policies and behaviours in the US in the 20th century came from those who were more 'right' leaning than left. I think Eisenhower is an interesting case, not clearly left or right leaning. His reaction to the Suez Crisis is a pertinent example as is his comment about being careful of the military industrial complex. I’ve already provided you with an excellent resource in Amity Shlaes’ book, which is very balanced in my opinion. As to the source of prejudice in the U.S., you might want to look up the supporters and participants in the underground railroad versus the opponents. I'll keep that in mind. Perhaps you could also consider comparing “true” socialism with plantation slavery. Both provide free housing, free healthcare, free food, free clothing, guaranteed lifetime employment, retirement benefits, and “from each according to their ability and to each according to their need” . . . along with labor quotas and forced labor in gulags, of course. I have no idea why you are making this comparison; I guess you're assuming that I have a particular social stance.JVL
May 14, 2021
May
05
May
14
14
2021
07:06 AM
7
07
06
AM
PDT
Following Querius' recommendation to JVL that he should read up on Margaret Sanger - yes, definitely. JVL said:
Anyway, finding AN advocate of pretty repulsive ideas who happened to come from one belief group is a far cry from showing the whole group was ‘racist’.
Margaret Sanger was not just a random individual I cited nor even the leader of something from the past. She is the founder of Planned Parenthood - one of the most well-funded and influential organizations in the world today. There are some prominent black leaders today who know quite clearly that Planned Parenthood attempted to destroy black families and that effort persists.Silver Asiatic
May 13, 2021
May
05
May
13
13
2021
04:58 PM
4
04
58
PM
PDT
JVL, If you think your rhetorical assertions are relevant, why don't you answer your own questions--maybe do a little research on U.S. history first. I already asked you if you thought Eisenhower was a leftist, and now that you've provided a definition that apparently satisfies you, take a shot at why you think he was. I've already provided you with an excellent resource in Amity Shlaes' book, which is very balanced in my opinion. As to the source of prejudice in the U.S., you might want to look up the supporters and participants in the underground railroad versus the opponents. Perhaps you could also consider comparing "true" socialism with plantation slavery. Both provide free housing, free healthcare, free food, free clothing, guaranteed lifetime employment, retirement benefits, and "from each according to their ability and to each according to their need" . . . along with labor quotas and forced labor in gulags, of course. -QQuerius
May 13, 2021
May
05
May
13
13
2021
03:22 PM
3
03
22
PM
PDT
Querius: That’s because you’re the one who who’s been making these assertions. I don't think I made many assertions except about clear racist behaviour in the 20th century. Perhaps you'd like to address those: Who objected to black athletes being allowed to participate in Major League Baseball? Who objected to mixed-race marriages? Who objected to the integration of schools and universities? Who insisted that there should be bus seats for whites and different ones for blacks? Who put burning crosses on the lawns of black families? Who lynched blacks? You might also familiarize yourself with the definition of “leftist” now that you’ve started brandishing this term. Leftist -- a person with left-wing political views? How's that? Someone familiar with U.S. history would also see the connection with the publication of Darwin’s book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, which sold out immediately in 1859, and the start of the U.S. Civil War in 1861 to end this “peculiar institution” in America. Do you think many Americans had read Darwin's book in the first couple of years after its publication? You do realise that slavery had already been eliminated in Great Britain where Darwin lived and published? The issues that led to the US war between the states had been percolating for decades before Darwin published.JVL
May 13, 2021
May
05
May
13
13
2021
02:13 AM
2
02
13
AM
PDT
JVL, That's because you're the one who who's been making these assertions. Have you since you looked into the history of desegregation in the U.S.? You might also want to educate yourself on the "Great Society" and how it destroyed many African-American families because federal housing projects required that husbands could not be present for their wives and children to receive this housing--and the Feds made sure that husbands weren't sneaking home at night. You can read about it Great Society: A New History by NY Times best-selling author Amity Shlaes. You might also familiarize yourself with the definition of "leftist" now that you've started brandishing this term. A huge factor in the propagation and scientific promotion of racism was Charles Darwin. Eugenics and Nazi racial ideology could point to "following the science" as a result. Someone familiar with U.S. history would also see the connection with the publication of Darwin's book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, which sold out immediately in 1859, and the start of the U.S. Civil War in 1861 to end this "peculiar institution" in America. -QQuerius
May 12, 2021
May
05
May
12
12
2021
03:39 PM
3
03
39
PM
PDT
Querius: But you now say you don’t know what “leftist” means? As I've already said: at some point it occurred to me that it would be respectful and sincere to make sure that I hadn't misinterpreted someone's use of the term. You're just arguing to argue. Why not get back to the point of the discussion?JVL
May 12, 2021
May
05
May
12
12
2021
08:54 AM
8
08
54
AM
PDT
JVL, You presented the following rhetorical questions in your post #32:
Hmm . . . wasn’t it leftist who supported desegregating schools? And were in favour of mixed ‘race’ marriages? And I don’t think it was the ‘leftists’ who opposed letting black athletes play in the National and American baseball leagues.
But you now say you don't know what "leftist" means? -QQuerius
May 12, 2021
May
05
May
12
12
2021
08:37 AM
8
08
37
AM
PDT
Querius: Actually, you used the term, “leftist” in your post #32. So, you do indeed use the term. I used it in a reply to someone who used it and I thought I knew what was meant or implied. And then later I considered that I might be misinterpreting the term and asked for clarification. I would not have used that term if I had initiated the topic nor do I use in in daily conversation or writing.JVL
May 12, 2021
May
05
May
12
12
2021
05:42 AM
5
05
42
AM
PDT
JVL,
What do you think “leftist” means? I don’t use the term myself so I have no definition.
Actually, you used the term, "leftist" in your post #32. So, you do indeed use the term. And what did you mean by using it . . . or do use terms that you have no definition for? -QQuerius
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:12 PM
10
10
12
PM
PDT
JVL . . . unless you
What is worse than an atheist? Answer: An atheist without humor.Sandy
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
02:39 PM
2
02
39
PM
PDT
Querius:You might want to read up more on U.S. history. If you’re referring to the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954, it was President Eisenhower who sent in the 101st Airborne Division to make sure that black children could attend school in Little Rock, Arkansas. Are you saying that Eisenhower was a leftist? What do you think "leftist" means? I don't use the term myself so I have no definition.JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
11:53 AM
11
11
53
AM
PDT
Jerry: The United States is currently the least racists country in the history of the world. What's your yardstick/criteria? How are you measuring racism?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
11:51 AM
11
11
51
AM
PDT
JVL,
Hmm . . . wasn’t it leftist who supported desegregating schools? And were in favour of mixed ‘race’ marriages? And I don’t think it was the ‘leftists’ who opposed letting black athletes play in the National and American baseball leagues.
You might want to read up more on U.S. history. If you're referring to the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954, it was President Eisenhower who sent in the 101st Airborne Division to make sure that black children could attend school in Little Rock, Arkansas. Are you saying that Eisenhower was a leftist? You should also read up on Margaret Sanger. -QQuerius
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
11:27 AM
11
11
27
AM
PDT
On the table and unchallenged Prove me wrong!!! The United States is currently the least racists country in the history of the world. Prove me wrong!!! The most racist persons in the 21st century are those who say racism is an issue. jerry
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
11:24 AM
11
11
24
AM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: I think behavior control is one of those things that is a concern, however, within a religion there are norms to follow and the norms are for a reason. It doesn't mean I have to agree with them. Nor does disagreeing with such things mean I condemn the whole community. The Negro Project was directed at black neighborhoods with the hope of curtailing birth of what she considered “human waste” – it was a eugenics project, very much along Darwinist lines. I know very little of Margaret Sanger and I've not heard of the Negro Project. Based sheerly on what you've posted above it sounds pretty odious and I think you'd find it difficult to find anyone who would support such views now. Anyway, finding AN advocate of pretty repulsive ideas who happened to come from one belief group is a far cry from showing the whole group was 'racist'. I'm glad such views are now rightly condemned and rejected. I assume you do as well.JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:56 AM
10
10
56
AM
PDT
Sandy: Just in case you're wondering . . . unless you indicate a genuine interest in having a civilised and collegial dialogue I'm going to ignore you. And that does mean not just blatantly asserting you're right and others are wrong. If you want to preach then be my guest but do not expect everyone to play along.JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:49 AM
10
10
49
AM
PDT
JVL
But I am not anti-Semitic; I just disagree with some of the attempts to control behaviour by some of that community.
I think behavior control is one of those things that is a concern, however, within a religion there are norms to follow and the norms are for a reason.
How did it emphasise that?
The Negro Project was directed at black neighborhoods with the hope of curtailing birth of what she considered "human waste" - it was a eugenics project, very much along Darwinist lines.
In Sanger’s view, humanitarianism threatened to swamp America with a tidal wave of the “feeble-minded.” As I explain in my book Darwin Day in America, feeblemindedness was an expansive category that included many people who today wouldn’t be considered mentally handicapped, including members of races (like blacks) considered by Darwinian biologists of the time to be “lower” on the evolutionary scale. “Feebleminded” persons could read. They could hold jobs. They could appear perfectly normal to everyone else. That’s why they were so dangerous according to eugenists. The feeble-minded could appear so ordinary that non-feebleminded persons might marry them and then spread their defective “germplasm” to the next generation. Sanger branded the feeble-minded a “menace … to the race” and compared them to “weeds.” In her bestselling book The Pivot of Civilization, she wrote that “our eyes should be opened to the terrific cost to the community of this dead weight of human waste.” https://evolutionnews.org/2020/06/margaret-sanger-statues-honor-a-racist-and-eugenicist-but-as-with-darwin-let-her-stay/
Silver Asiatic
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:44 AM
10
10
44
AM
PDT
JVL
Do you think it’s possible that you too regurgitate narratives?
Do you think it’s possible that you too regurgitate narratives?
Do you think it’s possible that you too regurgitate narratives?
Do you think it’s possible that you too regurgitate narratives?Sandy
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:33 AM
10
10
33
AM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: Ok, then they should have given the black schools more money. Why not built up the neighborhood and enhance pride and excellence in who you are and where you live? But the idea taught that their own people were not adequate and they had to go to some other place. For me it’s not black and white but ethnicity – and also religion. I agree, the schools in black neighbourhoods should have been better funded and supported. But I also think desegregating the schools was important; it asked the question: why should their be black-only schools and white-only schools. A very good question. I can be a consistent experience for the students – they share the same ethnicity. We permit people from Hispanic speaking backgrounds to speak Spanish and keep their culture. The old policy was that everybody should mix and become “white” – that was an idea of secularist social-engineering and worked against religion and family in many ways. What does a general, good, liberal arts education have to do with ethnicity? Most blacks in America were Christian at the time of the civil rights movement. Most of their families had been in the US longer that many more recent European immigrants. Is it not a good idea to have an American educational goal and system? The same for everyone? Isn't that what equality is about? The black neighborhoods were singled out in a special way. Margaret Sanger’s “Negro Project” put a special emphasis on destroying black family life. She was an atheist-leftist. How did it emphasise that? I guess it’s a matter of the hierarchy of values or of sins. Here, you’re claiming that Orthodox Jews, who by their religion are required to marry only other Jews, are by that fact “racist”. So, that condemns those Jews as an immoral bunch of people. A lot of people would call that anti-Semitic. That’s another term for “racist”, since Orthodox Jews are (as they claim) of a race. Yes, religion and race are linked – that’s Judiasm. Again, I don't think 'racist' is the right term for a faith community to have a high preference for their offspring to marry in the faith, as illustrated in the musical Fiddler on the Roof. That's their call; I think it's damaging to some of their children so, yes, I find fault with it. One of my cousins married a Jew and she ended up dealing with some nasty blowback. I, personally, just don't see the problem with mixed faith marriages as long as the couple are consenting adults. But I am not anti-Semitic; I just disagree with some of the attempts to control behaviour by some of that community. And It's pretty clear that Orthodox Jews are not a race no matter what they want to think.JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:10 AM
10
10
10
AM
PDT
Interesting . . .
The Synod of Gangra in the 4th century was a local assembly of a number of bishops that condemned what they claimed were heresies within their community. Among those heresies were Christians who were reported to have been encouraging slaves to escape the slavery imputed onto them by their masters, this being condemned in their Third Canon.[23] One of the individuals targeted by this council was a bishop named Eustathius of Sebaste, who is recorded by the historian Socrates Scholasticus in the Second Book and 43rd Chapter of his Church History to have "snatched slaves from their masters under the pretext of piety". He is reported to have submitted to the council, but then again, under an Antiochan synod, was accused of having perjured, or lied about his submission and continued the practice. Over a century after the Council of Gangra, the same issue was still significant enough that the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD had to issue a similar condemnation over monasteries helping slaves escape from the slavery of their masters.[24] Even by the sixth century, the emperor Justinian had to declare that masters have the legal authority to reclaim fugitive slaves from monasteries for up to three years.[25]
JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
10:03 AM
10
10
03
AM
PDT
JVL
I think the point at the time (in the 60s) was that all-black schools were not given the resources and money that all-white schools had. On average. The argument was that separate but equal was false; black schools were not ‘equal’ for the most part.
Ok, then they should have given the black schools more money. Why not built up the neighborhood and enhance pride and excellence in who you are and where you live? But the idea taught that their own people were not adequate and they had to go to some other place. For me it's not black and white but ethnicity - and also religion.
Anyway, why would anyone want all-black schools?
I can be a consistent experience for the students - they share the same ethnicity. We permit people from Hispanic speaking backgrounds to speak Spanish and keep their culture. The old policy was that everybody should mix and become "white" - that was an idea of secularist social-engineering and worked against religion and family in many ways. People reduced from family and ethnic culture to kind-of anonymous "individuals". That's the communist view - also going back to atheistic revolutions (French revolution) where family and religion were enemies of the state - people should just be "citizens" and really "belong to the state". The state itself replaces God and the family.
So, why do you single that out as being particularly destructive to the black culture?
The black neighborhoods were singled out in a special way. Margaret Sanger's "Negro Project" put a special emphasis on destroying black family life. She was an atheist-leftist.
And, yes, I think some Jews are ‘racist’ in the way you mean. But a belief system is not linked to a ‘race’ so I don’t think racist is the right term.
I guess it's a matter of the hierarchy of values or of sins. Here, you're claiming that Orthodox Jews, who by their religion are required to marry only other Jews, are by that fact "racist". So, that condemns those Jews as an immoral bunch of people. A lot of people would call that anti-Semitic. That's another term for "racist", since Orthodox Jews are (as they claim) of a race. Yes, religion and race are linked - that's Judiasm.Silver Asiatic
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:59 AM
9
09
59
AM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: As if all-black schools could not ever perform at a high level (because they believed black people were not capable). Umm . . . I think the point at the time (in the 60s) was that all-black schools were not given the resources and money that all-white schools had. On average. The argument was that separate but equal was false; black schools were not 'equal' for the most part. Anyway, why would anyone want all-black schools? Or all-white schools? What would be the point? Do you think Jews are racist because they insist only on marriage with other Jews? They do no all insist on that. And, yes, I think some Jews are 'racist' in the way you mean. But a belief system is not linked to a 'race' so I don't think racist is the right term. People who took the Christian faith seriously were the first abolitionists. The Catholic Church condemned slavery with the punishment of excommunication in the 1500’s – but many ignored that prohibition (opposition to slavery goes back to the 600s in the Christian world). The atheist-left was responsible for socialist restructure of the family and society. But, there were Christians who were slave owners and in favour of slavery. Also, please note, the abolitionist movement was gaining some real steam at about the same time as biologists (including Darwin) were starting to question the Biblical narrative. Yes. The demeaning of fatherhood and the nuclear family is indeed destructive for all racial groups. The correlations of divorce and poverty and afflictions that children face when traditional family is broken are well documented in sociological studies. So, why do you single that out as being particularly destructive to the black culture?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:37 AM
9
09
37
AM
PDT
Jerry: I oppose policies that harm people especially egregiously dysfunctional ones. They mostly all originate from one side of the political spectrum. So are we not allowed to call out groups who support these dysfunctional policies in mass? What policies in particular?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:28 AM
9
09
28
AM
PDT
JVL
Hmm . . . wasn’t it leftist who supported desegregating schools?
I referred to atheistic-leftists. You omitted part of that term. Atheistic-leftists (like Saul Alinsky) assumed that mixing races would be the answer to low performance - so, it was a racist policy. As if all-black schools could not ever perform at a high level (because they believed black people were not capable). Saul Alinsky was a racist and attempted to humiliate black people in order to embarrass white culture. I just learned about Michael Harrington via Jerry's post. Need more information - but he was an atheist-lefitst.
And were in favour of mixed ‘race’ marriages?
Do you think Jews are racist because they insist only on marriage with other Jews?
And I don’t think it was the ‘leftists’ who opposed letting black athletes play in the National and American baseball leagues.
People who took the Christian faith seriously were the first abolitionists. The Catholic Church condemned slavery with the punishment of excommunication in the 1500's - but many ignored that prohibition (opposition to slavery goes back to the 600s in the Christian world). The atheist-left was responsible for socialist restructure of the family and society.
IF that was destructive wouldn’t it be destructive for all racial groups?
Yes. The demeaning of fatherhood and the nuclear family is indeed destructive for all racial groups. The correlations of divorce and poverty and afflictions that children face when traditional family is broken are well documented in sociological studies.Silver Asiatic
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:23 AM
9
09
23
AM
PDT
Asauber: This is why its impossible to have a serious conversation with a liberal/prog/leftist/statist. They can’t think past the stoopid narratives they regurgitate. Do you think it's possible that you too regurgitate narratives?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:23 AM
9
09
23
AM
PDT
In old marriage ceremonies the term "worship" would be used along with what we now would say "love, honor and respect" for our spouse - so it makes sense. If a person says that they don't have a great love or esteem for anyone at all, I would wonder if it's just narcissism. Because they will usually love and defend and respect themself. Having honor and love for someone other than ourselves is one of those necessary things we all should do. Seversky is suggesting that he does not have any thing like this -- but can a person have no admiration and great respect for anything? If so, that's nihilism and atheism - no respect or love for anything at all.Silver Asiatic
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:06 AM
9
09
06
AM
PDT
Throwing labels at people is divisive and gets us nowhere. You are free to continue to do so but it says more about you than it does about the views you oppose.
Does it? Then thank you very much. I am happy to accept what it means about me to be against extremely bad policies by people who don't care very much and who are essentially racists. I oppose policies that harm people especially egregiously dysfunctional ones. They mostly all originate from one side of the political spectrum. So are we not allowed to call out groups who support these dysfunctional policies in mass? What's it say about people who support the political party that caused and implemented these dysfunctional policies? What's it say about the people who are silent on these policies and thus silent on the people who are responsible for them? The irony is that the people shouting "racist" are the real racists. So I am against the racists and proud of it.jerry
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:06 AM
9
09
06
AM
PDT
"I see that we are still using labels to demonize those with different opinions" How about this label: Racist This is why its impossible to have a serious conversation with a liberal/prog/leftist/statist. They can't think past the stoopid narratives they regurgitate, even when they contradict themselves. Andrewasauber
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
09:03 AM
9
09
03
AM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: Atheistic-leftism attacks black church communities, promotes abortion in black neighborhoods (Margaret Sanger), substituted propaganda for education in schools and destroys family life – attacking all the cornerstones of healthy life for the black people. Much of this was opposed by the pastors and community leaders (MLK was a Christian leader) but leftism has been relentless and destructive. Hmm . . . wasn't it leftist who supported desegregating schools? And were in favour of mixed 'race' marriages? And I don't think it was the 'leftists' who opposed letting black athletes play in the National and American baseball leagues. I’ll add that attacks against “patriarchy” have been destructive for black men – leading to many social problems. IF that was destructive wouldn't it be destructive for all racial groups? Jerry: Fatherless children, victim ideology both generated by while liberals which led to gangster rap culture. All have been disastrous. How are liberals/leftists responsible for fatherless black children? Want a name, Michael Harrington. His ideas became the policy of the Democratic Party and created one of the most dysfunctional societies in the history of the world. Very little to do with what people call racism. But very much a racist policy based on low expectations for a group of people by another group (white liberal politicians) who take advantage of them. I am unfamiliar with Michael Harrington and his Wikipedia article is pretty sparse. Can you supply or link to a summary of his views that are/were damaging to black people in America?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
08:59 AM
8
08
59
AM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply