Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Slate makes fun of Americans who doubt Darwin

Categories
Human evolution
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

But doesn’t this sort of thing get a bit old?

Here:

The next most popular statement was that “Adam and Eve, the first humans according to the Bible, were real, historical people.” Fifty-six percent of respondents affirmed this statement. But when they were pressed, only 44 percent said they were absolutely or very certain about it. A majority became a minority.

Well, of course, if we weren’t there ourselves. But how could we have been? Were you at your grandma’s wedding? Does that mean she never married?

When people were asked whether evolution, creationism, intelligent design, or “some combination” of them should be taught in public schools, only 18 percent said evolution should be taught exclusively. A majority, 55 percent, preferred “some combination.” But these people are pluralists, not absolutists. Only 19 percent of respondents said that creationism—the theory “that biological life was directly created by God in its present form at one point in time”—should be taught

But whoever thought creation-only was the issue? As opposed to the Darwin-bombing whose results we see in our culture today?

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
What's also odd is that this same kind of study was performed years ago by young-earth creationists. They had even more interesting results than biologos. Apparently, it is only newsworthy if the evolutionists are doing it. Somehow the data becomes tainted and icky if someone we don't like performs the study, but it is newsworthy when someone we like does it. Very strange.johnnyb
December 5, 2014
December
12
Dec
5
05
2014
10:34 AM
10
10
34
AM
PST
1 2

Leave a Reply