Not what we consider most interesting, not what got us the most hits, but stories that seem to signal a growing trend:
1. The Royal Society’s almost aborted efforts to free evolution studies from the stranglehold of Darwinism have been hope in the midst of stagnation. It is safer to be a non-Darwinian now that many are rethinking evolution. Also, much more interesting, as a recent books list shows.
Note: The issue isn’t really whether Darwinism (or neo-Darwinism or whatever) will be disconfirmed. It has long functioned as a religion, or if you like, a metaphysic, as Darwinist historian Michael Ruse has often pointed out:
Evolution after Darwin had set itself up to be something more than science. It was a popular science, the science of the marketplace and the museum, and it was a religion—whether this be purely secular or blended in with a form of liberal Christianity.
*For an informative account of the role of museums in the spread of evolution as a religion, see Michael Ruse, The Evolution Wars: A Guide to the Debates (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2000), pp. 103–05. For his own ambivalent view, see pp. 113–14.
A religion or metaphysic cannot be disconfirmed. One just moves on from it because other approaches to knowledge prove more fruitful and interesting.
See also: See also: “Junk” RNA helps regulate metabolism
Nothing says “Darwin snob” like indifference to the mess that the entire concept of speciation is in Follow UD News at Twitter!