Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Teacher gets fired when colleague rats his doubts about Darwinism

Categories
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here’s a Discovery Institute podcast:

On this episode of ID The Future, CSC’s Casey Luskin interviews Rodney LeVake, the plaintiff in the Academic Freedom court case LeVake vs. Independent School District #656. LeVake, a former high school biology teacher, informally expressed doubts about evolution to a colleague who then reported him to the principal. LeVake ended up losing his biology position, not because he taught creationism or intelligent design, but merely because he expressed reservations about evolution to a colleague. Listen as he tells his story of clear academic persecution.

Huh? Why isn’t this happening in Canada? I thought we had cornered the Western world market on suppression of thought and speech.

Oh but wait! Here in Canada we actually have a government department, the Canadian Human Rights Commission, whose employees post racist and homophobic garbage on Web sites and then get anyone who responds charged.

So relax, Canucks,we’re still ahead of the Yanks in the “tax-supported goofs + goons” department. Sigh. Guess traditional Canadians like me should continue to check out the latest fashions in bags to wear over one’s head …. or else get serious about fixing the problem (which I am, believe me).

Meanwhile, here are the latest posts at Colliding Universes, my blog about competing theories of our universe:

Origin of life: But is being greedy enough?

Large Hadron Collider: Experiments underway

Podcast: The argument from design in cosmology

The truth hurts … and it can leave you seeing stars, too …

The nothingness of nothing … as seen by scientists, philosophers, and others

Physics: No escape from philosophy through equations?

Does our solar system occupy a unique position in the universe, or just an ordinary one?

Extraterrestrials: Several million UFO reports later … the state of the question

More demolition teams trying to blow up the Big Bang

Do you have time to hear about some new theories … of time?

Now, if the butterflies would just appear out of nowhere …

Chaos theorists stumped by butterfly effect?

Solar system: Ours is special, researchers say

Aussie PM: Cosmic order proves God exists

Origin of life: Ah, that “just so happens” series of intermediate chemical steps ..

Physicist realizes that there is more to nature than materialist atheism can explain

Rehabilitating the idea of creation – Big Bang cosmology

Comments
As much as I'd like to agree with this post, the appeals court decision is easily available on-line. In it it is evident that LeVake had made it quite clear that he could/would not teach the course as prescribed, and it was this fact, not the fact that he had expressed doubts about evolution in a conversation, that led to his dismissal. From the judgement:
D E C I S I O N Because LeVake's position paper and his statement to Hubert make it clear that LeVake would not teach the required course curriculum in the manner established by the school board, LeVake has not presented any genuine issue of material fact regarding his free exercise, free speech, and due process claims. Thus, the district court did not err in granting respondents' motion for summary judgment.
It is quite possible to have doubts about any number of things (like models of the big-bang), while still following the letter of the law when it comes to teaching the course. Of course, this doesn't mean I agree with the dismissal, and the whole situation stinks of fascism.SCheesman
September 12, 2008
September
09
Sep
12
12
2008
02:43 PM
2
02
43
PM
PDT
Rats like that should be hung (pun intended) and so should the school board Darweenies. ;-)Borne
September 12, 2008
September
09
Sep
12
12
2008
12:34 PM
12
12
34
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply