Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Textbook wars: The fact that something evolved does not mean that Darwinism caused it

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A blog repeats a whole lot of stale stuff about Americans not believing in evolution, in support of a 2013 textbook, whose cover shows insects that look like leaves.

It’s a great cover, but what does it show? That Darwinism is true? Almost everyone crabbing about the fact that Americans do not believe in evolution means that Americans do not believe in Darwinism – the only theory of evolution ever developed explicitly to destroy the idea of design.

Somehow or other, looking five percent like a leaf was supposed to prevent the original forebears of these insects from getting eaten as often as their own forebears did. And the Darwinist’s usual response to any doubt about this explanation has been ridicule – and court cases, if ridicule doesn’t work.

Normal people push back.

By the way, an equally interesting example is the praying mantis that looks like dropped petals. It’s amazing. But it is not evidence for Darwin’s theory either.

Hat tip: Pos-Darwinista

Comments
Joe, I have read a lot of ID-ists trying to make just that point. The very definition of intelligent design practically makes that point. The Discovery Institute only has so much money. It can't go into every home and make sure everybody is 100% clear on this issue.Collin
March 12, 2012
March
03
Mar
12
12
2012
12:05 PM
12
12
05
PM
PDT
Joe: I actually disagree; let's not forget that Young Earth Creationists accept what seems to be evolution up to the level of the family or thereabouts, and that the co-founder of evolutionary theory believed in intelligent evolution, and wrote publicly and at length to that effect. It is no accident that his major book was recently republished by a publisher called Forgotten Books. We are dealing with people who reject easily accessible evidence to the contrary of ever so many new atheist talking points, because they are locked up in an ideology. The issue is not whether Creationism or Theistic Evolution or ID accepts that there is some degree of evolution, even up to universal common descent -- why, Behe, one of the top two ID supporting scientists, believes that. WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH A PRIORI MATERIALISM IMPOSED AS A DEFINITION OF SCIENCE AND AS A CRITERION OF BEING ACCEPTABLY RATIONAL. Until that is sufficiently exposed and broken based on its multiple reductions to absurdity, the radical ideologues we are dealing with will not back off. Which, is what happened with the Marxists 20 years past. KFkairosfocus
March 12, 2012
March
03
Mar
12
12
2012
08:09 AM
8
08
09
AM
PDT
Well until IDists go on an all-out campaign to tell the people that Intellgent Design is NOT anti-evolution, this is the type of stuff we can expect because right now most people who are not involved do not understand that ID is not anti-evolution and will be easliy swayed by such tripe.Joe
March 12, 2012
March
03
Mar
12
12
2012
04:20 AM
4
04
20
AM
PDT
1 3 4 5

Leave a Reply