Culture Intelligent Design Media Naturalism News

The New Republic collapse: Even the keynote speaker cancelled her subscription

Spread the love

File:A small cup of coffee.JPG Recently, we’ve been following the uproar/upheavals/mass resignations at the venerable New Republic after a new owner made himself editor-in-chief.

We took an interest because abruptly fired editor Leon Wieseltier (see“Reflections on the cult of unanimity”) had begun to speak out against scientism and Darwin’s dittoheads.

Probably not what got him fired; more likely that was just one of many acts of treason against dittohead consensus in an age when diversity means diversity of everything except opinion.

Anyway, the New Yorker offers an inside take:

While Clinton, Ginsburg, and Marsalis provided a dignified glamour to the proceedings, it was the contrasting addresses of the magazine’s owner and editors that provided the drama. Hughes talked about radical—but unspecified—change, while Foer celebrated the magazine’s intellectual heritage. Wieseltier responded to Hughes with a message about stewardship. “We are not only disruptors and incubators and accelerators,” he said, seemingly mocking the language that Hughes and Vidra often used. “We are also stewards and guardians and trustees.” He went on,“The questions that we must ask ourselves, and that our historians and our children will ask of us, are these: How will what we create compare with what we inherited? Will we add to our tradition or will we subtract from it? Will we enrich it or will we deplete it?”

Hughes tried to contain the damage. As rumors of a second wave of departures circulated, Hughes and Snyder offered several members of the remaining editorial staff one- to two-thousand-dollar bonuses, and in an op-ed for the Washington Post Hughes tried to explain his vision for the magazine. He told me, “I could have done a better job, at times, of making sure that the editorial staff knew that when we talked about experimentation, innovation, it wasn’t to come at the cost of the things that made us special.”

For many longtime friends of T.N.R., the contrition was too late. This week, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who had delivered the toast to the magazine on its hundredth anniversary, sent a private note to one of the departing editors telling him that she had cancelled her subscription.

View from O’Leary for News: In addition to the inherent fragility of thinkmags, the Internet has so fragmented and downsized the cost of “thinkmagging” that a venerable institution like TNR is vulnerable to becoming a millionaire’s toy.

One factor that prevented such mags from reaching toy status in the past was the unique service they provided.  “It doesn’t just chatter, it thinks!”  Today, it could be duplicated, mixed and matched, and riffed on for free at a dozens of Web sites, if reader interest continues.

Obviously, quality sites must be supported financially, but such sites do not face many traditional publishing costs. We play in a different field. We will watch developments with interest.

Note: Evolution News & Views’s David Klinghoffer had an interesting take:

I identify with TNR’s ex-staff, too, in a more fundamental way. In the evolution controversy, it’s supporters of intelligent design who stand for ideas (disagree with us or not) and idealism. We’ve paid a heavy price for that. No one has ever gone into the field of ID in search of career security. By contrast, whatever the merits of Darwinian theory as science, its advocates often seem to be a cynical lot, too comfortable in the role of bully, short on respect for ideas and debate, more interested in punishing and silencing than in arguing.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

3 Replies to “The New Republic collapse: Even the keynote speaker cancelled her subscription

  1. 1
    Barry Arrington says:

    “We are also stewards and guardians and trustees.”

    Positively Burkean. And this from a former editor of TNR. Irony alert!

  2. 2
    Robert Byers says:

    Everybody cancell their subscription to this evil rag. Yes evil fits and I make accusations carefully.
    I can’t stand the judge Ruth as I see her as a quota for the court and not worthy and does the wrong and bad decisions.
    Still in this case she judges right.
    ID folk need to remember here that freedom of speech is not to be trusted in a mouthpiece for control of speech. new rEpublic is a enemy to mankind, christiandom, justice, equity, and love.
    finally they turn on each other. there is a God.
    a christmas gift for good guys everywhere.
    breath in that humiliation they are in.

  3. 3
    LauraKnight says:

    Anyone buying an opinion magazine has to know going in they’re going to lose money. These issues don’t exactly fly off the newstands into shopping bags. That’s not the point. The point is to have a publication that contributes and sometimes influence discussion and debate and bring forth new ideas. That’s the investment you make and good money option for British people you have.

Leave a Reply