Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Why we have a News desk

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
Bio_Symposium_033.jpg
credit Laszlo Bencze

Bornagain77 kindly writes, in response to: November 2014: Events that made a difference to ID,

Thanks for all your hard work. You probably don’t know it as much as you should because of all the insults from Darwinists, but you are very much appreciated!

Actually, I find Darwin’s followers, and naturalists generally, amusing—and normally judge them by whether they could possibly contribute to our site numbers in some legitimate way.

(True, some people might visit our site only to read The Best of Joe Troll and Joe Moron. But we think Joe + Joe’s fans would be happier at another site… and we would not want serious commenters of any sort to be discouraged by those guys’ slow-class antics. So I am happy with serious commenters whatever their orientation—but am a mod and can borf the Joes.)

I started writing news for Uncommon Descent a while back because it seemed that no one was telling the ID community’s story from the perspective of the ID community as such.

Having been a newsie all my life, I saw that as a significant gap.

Various publications, friendly or hostile, were fronting news about us. But there was no generic news stream for us. So I started one.

As always, some like it, some hate it, and most either read it or not. Anyway, if you heard news of interest here first, that’s my job.

See also: Who just wouldn’t be accepted in the ID community?

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
we’re still waiting for something, anything
Are you familiar with the general axiom that information requires the arrangement of a material medium for it to be instantiate in? From that arrangement of the material medium it is then translated into a physical effect?Upright BiPed
January 3, 2015
January
01
Jan
3
03
2015
02:28 AM
2
02
28
AM
PDT
RVB8, I find your tone and failure to appreciate the significance of news, views and issues coverage in the teeth of a patently hostile institutional establishment inadvertently, sadly revealing. Please, think again. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2015
January
01
Jan
3
03
2015
02:05 AM
2
02
05
AM
PDT
Serious commenters are attracted by serious comments. Ooops, as I don't believe this self-promotional speil to be a serious comment am I therefore, as night follows day, not serious myself? The 'first job' of this entire site is to teach the ID point of view, and the second is to explain its latest research. The first was achieved in April 2005, with the first post, when Dembsky had not yet flown. The second has never happened,we're still waiting for something, anything. Pointing out, and linking to news stories that diss Darwin and Evolutionary Biology does not make you a 'newsie', it makes you a curmudgeon for ID. Fair enough, defending something that is as yet not clearly defined (ie how is design detected? at what microscopic level can we say, 'stop here, beyond this structure evolution is replaced by design'), is your right as you constantly point out, but some positive news about ID from any recognised, renowned, source would be a start. (Recognised? Renowned? A university, government lab, private lab, research institute. Not youtube, ICR, AIG, EvoNews or a Church.)rvb8
January 3, 2015
January
01
Jan
3
03
2015
01:57 AM
1
01
57
AM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply