Why you, UD reader, are perchance not a member of the Party of Science…
|December 17, 2017||Posted by News under Culture, Extraterrestrial life, Intelligent Design, Science|
Ed Driscoll offers Party gossip, with links, at Instapundit:
—“Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program,” the New York Times today: It’s no secret that the Hillary Clinton campaign chairman is a UFO buff, but the recent WikiLeaks dump of Mr. Podesta’s hacked account sheds new light on how deeply interested he is in extraterrestrial conspiracy theories.
“Leaked Podesta emails encourage UFO buffs seeking declassification in a Clinton administration,” the Washington Times, October 16, 2016
Speaking of “spiritual people,” maybe the Washington Post’s Sally Quinn can use her Ouija board to make contact with the aliens. The truth is out there! More.
A growing source of unproductive conflict in western culture: “Science” is becoming merely the attitudes, values, beliefs, hopes, fears, allegiances, and prejudices of the people who work there, without any external standard applied and none expected or wanted.
Hence all the marchin’, marchin’ doesn’t look the way they hoped it would.
And then, of course, tinpot jeremiahs attack a skeptical public that supposedly “hates science.”
This won’t end well.
See also: Occult graining ground among ”sciencey” liberals
Does post-modern naturalism lead to a rise in superstition? Millennials are ditching monotheism for witchcraft. But then post-modern naturalism holds that whatever you evolved to believe in is the ultimate Cool for you.
On why Americans “hate science” Health science is the way most people interact with science and in many areas, it is running neck and neck with the office rumor mill for credibility.
If this is science, yes we do hate it