academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games COVID-19 vaccines Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy health and health concerns Medicine

Dr John Campbell, more on Ivermectin

Spread the love

Here is Dr John Campbell on Ivermectin (IVM):

Recall, here is a picture of the kit used in Uttar Pradesh, India where the sort of protocol illustrated helped break the Delta dominated wave:

Food for thought. END

14 Replies to “Dr John Campbell, more on Ivermectin

  1. 1
    kairosfocus says:

    Dr John Campbell, more on Ivermectin

  2. 2
    Lieutenant Commander Data says:

    U.m.b.e.l.i.e.v.a.b.l.e. ! Millions died because we are ruled by criminals:
    A Letter to Andrew Hill | Dr Tess Lawrie – Ivermectin Suppression Likely Killed Millions
    https://rumble.com/vwg569-a-letter-to-andrew-hill-dr-tess-lawrie-ivermectin-suppression-killed-millio.html

    https://twitter.com/BreesAnna/status/1500504735362789385

    from 28.00 min:
    https://rumble.com/vwe9l7-who-killed-ivermectin-the-highwire-and-tess-lawrie-md-phd.html

  3. 3
    PaV says:

    LCD:

    Incredible video! Everyone should look at the 18 minute long “Letter to Andrew Hill.”

    Big Pharma made lots of money. What are a few million destroyed lives and hundred of thousands of needless deaths! And the media sleeps.

  4. 4
    Querius says:

    And now the facade is beginning to crumble:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1500911978352500737

    -Q

  5. 5
    Seversky says:

    You don’t need grandiose public declarations or YouTube videos or tweets. That isn’t how science is done. You need carefully-designed, rigorously controlled clinical trials to find out if ivermectin demonstrates efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 virus at concentrations which are safe for the human hosts. If it comes through those trials successfully then there’s a good chance you are on to a winner. All the rest is anecdote and speculation.

  6. 6
    Querius says:

    Seversky @5,
    I’ve read a lot of the published literature and the findings of many of them contradict the current narrative.

    Here’s a sample . . .
    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.19.435959v1.full
    https://fee.org/articles/spain-s-first-study-on-omicron-finds-vaccinated-people-spread-covid-at-same-rate-as-unvaccinated/
    https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1279005/v1
    https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a-citywide-prospective-observational-study-of-223128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33747261/
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536980/

    Yes, the CDC normally requires years of strictly controlled studies EXCEPT for certain “emergency” vaccines (they’re now all of a sudden dragging their heels on Novovax) and have suppressed the results of a number of proven anti-viral treatments that work well for other corona viruses, slimed the reputations of eminent doctors and scientists who disagree, and covered up the mysterious deaths of an extraordinary number of young and healthy people all because some favored drug companies are making Billions of Dollars of profit and bureaucrats get such a delightful opportunity to COERCE people to take an experimental vaccine that’s now believed (from an in vitro study) to permanently change human DNA (creating “spike DNA”) in the liver, all in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code for a virus with a ~97% survival rate.

    Yeah, we should all follow the science fiction.

    -Q

  7. 7
    kairosfocus says:

    Sev, we are beyond sample based studies. Uttar Pradesh, using the low IVM dosage rate Dr Campbell notes on, has broken the epidemic even with a low vaccination rate. Israel, an extraordinarily high and fast vax uptake population, is on jab 4. The UK sees a majority of cases, hospitalisations and deaths coming from the vaxxed.Campbell is noting on city-wide population scale studies showing significant preventive action on low dosage. It is criminally negligent to ignore or distort that result and continue to marginalise and malign treatment based approaches, which — think theraflu — are standard for very similar annual flu outbreaks. KF

    PS, as Dr McCollough and Dr Malone note, the “gold standard,” megabuck studies take 2 – 4 years and so are not time-responsive. Back in 2020, as you will recall, I noted that cumulative evidence is evidence and it was pointed out that the big placebo controlled studies often simply confirm the trend. Besides, much of the issue is safety not efficacy, where repurposed, off label drugs have a much better established safety profile so it is no surprise that many physicians use them once there is significant evidence of effect, e.g. HCQ vs Arthritis and Lupus are off label for an antimalarial. Also, once an effect is strong, it is rapidly and pervasively manifest — this is scientific methods 101 — and so will come out in carefully done small scale observational studies and experiments. Modern science pivoted on studies that started with a pendulum effect for a chandelier in church and became a global revolution pivoting on connecting dots from an apple falling to the Moon swinging by in orbit. The effects of IVM etc fall in this category. For 1 1/2+ years, there has been adequate evidence regarding a growing number of treatments, but there has been an extraordinary, ugly campaign to block them in favour of experimental vaxxes with significantly high adverse event rates and low effectiveness compared with traditional vaxxes. While I don’t swallow the greed narrative wholesale, I do think we see evidence of established interests seeking to dominate and control what is deemed legitimate scientific knowledge as a basis for claiming extraordinary leverage over policy and national life, including the economy. That is a form of socialistic central planning and it will fail again but will create chaos on the way. Likewise, the rise of censorship and surveillance state in the policy is outright misanthropic and anti-civilisational. “No man could buy or sell, save . . .”

  8. 8
    kairosfocus says:

    PPS, these patterns are quite familiar, as we ID supporters have been subject to much the same marginalising tactics. Now, they are metastasising.

  9. 9
    jerry says:

    subject to much the same marginalizing

    The BBC went after Campbell and did not respond to his questions about their specious attacks.

    He spent one of his videos a couple weeks ago on it.

  10. 10
    kairosfocus says:

    Jerry, you mean this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bza1gAc8sOA The Beeb has long lost the shine on the ball, I’m afraid. He debunks a Beeb IVM debunk hit piece, here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy7c_FHiEac KF

  11. 11
    kairosfocus says:

    BTW, with population results on the table we are beyond the studies stage.

  12. 12
  13. 13
    kairosfocus says:

    PS: Clipping the 2nd:

    reports of myocarditis and pericarditis are so prevalent now that just in the first eight weeks of 2022, we’re already at 47% of the total VAERS submissions for 2021. There were 24,177 reports of pericarditis/myocarditis submitted to VAERS in 2021. In 2022, just through Feb. 25, there were 11,289 reports, which is nearly half of last year’s total . . . .

    The reporting to VAERS is very disturbing because the trend line of vaccination, especially for the younger people more prone to this heart inflammation, has halted to a trickle in recent weeks. So why are there so many more reports this year? There are likely two possible explanations. Either more people and doctors know about VAERS and know to look for myocarditis, or there is a time bomb with many more people now realizing they have heart problems months later. Either way, this means that the initial estimates of case prevalence were just the tip of the iceberg, and we are likely to see young hearts damaged for years to come.

    What is so shocking is that several weeks ago, the CDC recognized the problem and attempted to get ahead of it by suggesting that “an 8-week interval may be optimal for some people ages 12 years and older, especially for males ages 12 to 39 years.” But historically, if we recognized even a fraction of heart problems from a shot, it would have been pulled from the market entirely! Yet here they are still recommending it, despite the fact that the virus poses low risk for this age group, notwithstanding the fact that the shot doesn’t stop transmission and that it is now outdated for the current strain of the virus! . . . .

    It’s not acceptable (and never was) for the media and the pharma-paid “fact checkers” to automatically dismiss VAERS. It is our main pharmaco-surveillance tool and was put in place precisely to serve as the consolation to the public for Congress absolving vaccine manufactures of liability. Also, the data complements what we’ve learned universally from all the myocarditis vaccine studies – that it targets teens and early 20s more than other age groups and is more potent after the second dose.

    This is of course not the usual understated writing, but we do need to address concerns raised.

    KF

  14. 14
    kairosfocus says:

    Notice, the element of commentary that is missing here?

Leave a Reply