Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

[off topic] Balmy North Pole

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A news brief in Scientific American (subscriber only, no link) alerted me to the following article:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060601091313.htm

Summarized:

Core sediments retrieved by three icebreakers recently analyzed reveal the following:

-North Pole’s temperature 55 million years ago: 23C/73F (today it is -20C/-4F)

-Concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere 55mya was 2000 ppm (today it is 380 ppm)

-Global average temperature 55mya under above conditions was 5C/9F degrees C higher than today (in Sciam News Brief only, Science Daily says tropics remained liveable).

Obviously, the earth recovered, if it was even “harmed”. I post this because so-called global warming is blamed on human activities by the worst kind of consensus pseudoscience (Darwinian evolution is consensus pseudoscience as well) and is projected to be catastrophic. But look at this recent data. With carbon dioxide concentration 5 times higher than today the global average temperature rise is within normal year-to-year variation we all experience right now. The earth doesn’t turn into a runaway greenhouse. We don’t have enough fossil fuel on the planet to quintuple the CO2 in the atmosphere. It happens WITHOUT human activity. It’s NORMAL. Sea levels will rise. Ocean salinity will decrease. Life will go on thriving like it always has. Just like forest fires give certain species their turn at bat in the cyclically changing environment so too does global warming. These are the facts.

Comments
It is unfortunate that DaveScot has to get personal by claiming I can't see what he and he alone thinks is another hoax. The wilfull destruction of the environment by man is not a hoax. It is demonstrated reality. It looks like, once again, it's DaveScot's way or the highway. That is fine with me too. It won't be the first time. I was invited here and don't care to be treated like a moron. "A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable." John A. DavisonJohn A. Davison
October 9, 2006
October
10
Oct
9
09
2006
08:25 AM
8
08
25
AM
PDT
oops typo: alarmist*Jipitea
October 9, 2006
October
10
Oct
9
09
2006
08:11 AM
8
08
11
AM
PDT
This is just more alamirist nonsense coming from the green lobby(and their darwinist allies) in their attempt to force big government on business. The anticapitalist doomsdayers will stop at nothing 'till we're all living in caves catching fish for a living. 30 years ago it was global cooling. 'Nuff said.Jipitea
October 9, 2006
October
10
Oct
9
09
2006
08:09 AM
8
08
09
AM
PDT
I still remember the last pseudoscience brouhaha - nuclear winter over 20 years ago. If the earth starts getting too hot as the current pseudoscience fad predicts all we have to do is set off a fraction of our nuclear weapon stockpile in a remote desert region when the weather is right to carry fallout out to sea and global warming alarmist pseudoscience plus nuclear winter alarmist pseudoscience combine into global just-right anti-alarmist pseudoscience. This will kill two birds with one stone as it will deplete the world's supply of nuclear bombs. :razz: The penalty paid will be a barely detectable rise in cancer rates. I say we take the money saved from ignoring global warming and pump it into cancer research and then we get three birds killed with one stone. Am I good at this or what?DaveScot
October 9, 2006
October
10
Oct
9
09
2006
07:56 AM
7
07
56
AM
PDT
John It's only fair that you ignore my opinion on global warming for I surely ignore yours. I'm far from alone in my opinions though I do seem to be in a minority. Almost all the same scientists who blindly support the Darwinian narrative also blindly support the global warming brouhaha. It's like a club and there are certain pseudoscientific theories that must be evangelized (or at least accorded positive lip service when the subject comes up) to remain a member in good standing. Too bad your ability to see through one hoax doesn't apply to others. Further reading for the other side of the story.DaveScot
October 9, 2006
October
10
Oct
9
09
2006
07:41 AM
7
07
41
AM
PDT
DaveScot Well it is nice to be reassured that we have nothing to worry about. Pardon me if I pay absolutely no attention to your pronunciamentos except to say that they are yours and yours alone as near as I can tell. These are NOT the facts. These are your predictions and nothing more. You surprise me. "For the sixth extinction, however, we do know the culprit. we are." Richard Leakey, The Sixth Extinction, page 254. "A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable." John A. DavisonJohn A. Davison
October 9, 2006
October
10
Oct
9
09
2006
07:17 AM
7
07
17
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply