From John Saxbee at Church Times, reviewing Keith Eyeons’ The Theology of Everything: Renaissance Man joins the 21st century:
… Yet scientists continue to pursue a theory of everything, and this irony is not lost on Eyeons, who sets out to reclaim this territory for theologians in general, and for Christian theology in particular.
The subtitle channels Renaissance Man (sic) as the archetype of a mindset committed to a comprehensive and all-embracing account of reality. Modern dualisms that attribute what is physical or spiritual, objective or subjective, religious or scientific to separate silos need to be roundly challenged — especially when they are then co-opted to support atheism as the only respectable option for people today. More.
People who insist on a theory of everything that doesn’t include the mind of God tend to behave like the guy with a hammer who thinks everything is a nail. Once we include the mind of God we are out of our depth but, let’s face it, we were anyway.
See also: How string theory can be a theory of everything
Post-modern physics: String theory gets over the need for evidence
Dusting off a 1970s Theory of Everything could be bad news for supersymmetry
Can a theory of consciousness help us build a theory of everything?
and
Post-modern science: The illusion of consciousness sees through itself
as to this quote from the article:
The ‘Renaissance’ is Whig history or “New Atheist Bad History”
In the following articles, an atheist scholar of medieval history (Tim O’Neill), admits that secular humanists have tried, because of their bias against Christianity, to rewrite history
In fact, the false revisionist history of “the Renaissance” and the enlightenment saving us from the dark ages of Christianity is apparently so entrenched in left wing academia that President Obama, in his farewell address, falsely claimed that enlightenment thinking guided the American founders instead of Christian and Biblical principles guiding them as they actually did.
A more realistic historical account of what ‘enlightenment’ thinking actually led to can be found in, not in America’s founding, but in the The French Revolution and it’s Reign of Terror which launched the first modern genocide aimed at Christians and where 40,000 people were beheaded and 300,000 were butchered.
In fact, despite atheists constantly trying to rewrite history, Christianity alone, out of all the worldviews, was responsible for the ‘age of science’:
In the article he goes on to state:
Darwinian evolution is an even bigger lie in Academia than the false revisionist history from atheists of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment leading to modern science is. (and seeing as I’m writing this post on UD I don’t even have to cite any evidence to back up that claim)
All is not lost though. He goes on to state this in the article:
It seems that recent findings from Quantum Mechanics may have made it into his book:
Moreover, the scientific “Theory of Everything”, which apparently was the inspiration behind the title of his book, “The Theology of Everything”, is a lot more friendly, and straightforward, to Christian presuppositions, even to Christian Theology itself, than the author apparently realized: