2 Replies to “Philip Cunningham’s critique of methodological naturalism

  1. 1
    Origenes says:

    That Paul Nelson quote is awesome:

    MN [methodological naturalism] entails an ontology in which minds are the consequence of physics, and thus, can only be placeholders for a more detailed causal account in which physics is the only (ultimate) actor. You didn’t write your email to me. Physics did, and informed you of that event after the fact.

    “That’s crazy,” you reply, “I certainly did write my email.” Okay, then — to what does the pronoun “I” in that sentence refer?

  2. 2
    Seversky says:

    Is there a reason why BA77 no longer posts here?

Leave a Reply