Intelligent Design Philosophy Science

Theodore Dalrymple on enshrining untruth

Spread the love

Retired prison psychiatrist Theodore Dalrymple must have heard it all. This from him on a popular example:

Among the propositions defended with such suspect ferocity is that men can change straightforwardly and unambiguously into women, and vice versa. Now everyone accepts that they can change into something different from ordinary men and women, and can live as if they were of the opposite of their birth sex; moreover, there is no reason to abuse or otherwise maltreat them if they do, and kindness and human decency require that we do not humiliate them or make their lives more difficult than they are. But this is not at all the same as claiming that those who take hormones and have operations actually are the sex that they choose, or that it is right to enshrine untruth in law and thereby force people to assent to what they know to be false. That way totalitarianism lies. – Law & Liberty, February 15, 2023

Unworkable or unbelievable science might be expected to take refuge in totalitarianism. That rids it of the risk of falsification.

9 Replies to “Theodore Dalrymple on enshrining untruth

  1. 1
    AnimatedDust says:

    Excellent quote.

  2. 2
    jerry says:

    Dalrymple is a pen name, his real name is Anthony Daniels.

    He is an atheist but defends holding religious views. Here is an article he wrote about it in 2007’t-see-13058.html

    He is one of the great modern thinkers on many things though I think he has come short on the existence of a Creator..

  3. 3
    AnimatedDust says:

    Thanks for the link, Jerry. sublime read!

  4. 4
    jerry says:

    Might as well post this here.

    Broken Science Initiative’s February 18, 2023 event in Phoenix, AZ.

    We are living through a time where critical thinking is discouraged, drugs are routinely approved and pushed to market despite evidence that they work and politicians are telling us to “believe in the science.” Validating and replicating results are no longer standard practice. It is estimated that more than 50 percent of medical research cannot be replicated and that number only increases when we look at cancer treatments, dementia drugs and other critical areas of care.

    The Broken Science Initiative is here to expose this corruption, malfeasance and negligence. We have identified the roots of these problems in the philosophy of science. We’ve traced them through history up to our present day. While many people have become more aware of these issues with handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, the erosion of science for political and financial gains began long before 2020.

    Read William Briggs report. Briggs is the master of statistics and inference.

  5. 5
    Seversky says:

    Is this about mending “broken science” or about trying to undermine any confidence in science that disagrees with the critic’s political and/or religious beliefs?

    And, if you discard science, what is being proposed as a replacement? Prayer? Divine revelation?

  6. 6
    jerry says:

    And, if you discard science, what is being proposed as a replacement? Prayer? Divine revelation?

    No, real science not the fake science you advocate for.

    Do you realize how stupid your comment was? I my guess is that you do but that seems to be an objective, to make stupid comments. You can never defend what you post.

  7. 7
    JVL says:

    Jerry: No, real science not the fake science you advocate for.

    How would ‘real’ science look different from the science being done by modern day scientists?

  8. 8
    relatd says:

    Seversky at 5,

    When man only believes in man, then politics gets worshiped.

    Still railing against God? You should talk to Him. He’s waiting…

  9. 9
    AnimatedDust says:

    JVL @ 7:

    Real science would follow the evidence wherever it leads. Per Lewontin, design is not allowed as a valid inference due to an a priori ideological roadblock that diverts all scientific traffic back to natural causes. You and the entire scientific community have been traveling in that ridiculous circuit since 1859.

    Time to clear the ideological roadblock and open the road.

    “Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.

    It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”

    Richard C. Lewontin NYRB 1997

Leave a Reply