Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

A Simple Request

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

After mulling over the recent blasphemy challenge brouhaha, I have a concern I’d like to express. Spiritual matters aside, I want to draw attention to the potential psychological ramifications of committing such an act as the challenge requires. As long as the person remains an atheist (or at least a non-Christian), I see no problems. However, what if he or she were to come to believe later in life that Christianity is true and that he or she had committed a sin for which no forgiveness can be attained and for which the penalty is eternity in hell?

That people’s beliefs can change as they go through life is true. That people can and have converted from atheism to Christianity is also true. And I submit that if an atheist were to come to believe that Christianity is true and that he or she had committed a necessarily damning act that this has the potential to cause traumatic psychological distress. I find it especially bad that the people who are doing this are targeting the most impressionable members of our society—our youth.

Let me make it clear right now that I do not oppose the rights of people to express their beliefs (or lack thereof) on YouTube or anywhere else. I think that even the choice of a person to blaspheme the Holy Spirit is one that he or she should be free to make. What I do oppose is a public campaign which encourages people—especially young people, whose capacities to assess their worldviews and to make informed, responsible decisions based upon them are generally not on par with those of adults—to commit an act which carries with it potentially disastrous psychological consequences. I hereby request that atheists who read this voice their displeasure that such a campaign is being conducted.

Comments
A conversion from atheism to Christianity need not be reasonable by any stretch of the imagination (as the atheist may argue along this line) in order for the force of my argument to carry through. The challenge carries with it the irresponsible presumption that its participants have all made well-informed decisions--while targeting youth! People can passionately embrace worldviews (including atheism) for reasons that are insufficiently rational and can change them (to Christianity, for example) for like reasons. I say that youth--who are more likely to be driven by passion than by a level head--have especially volitile worldviews. There will be a few participants who will suffer emotionally from their decision.crandaddy
December 20, 2006
December
12
Dec
20
20
2006
10:05 PM
10
10
05
PM
PDT
Is it possible that Dawkins and his ilk are inadvertently promoting child abuse? Just a thought and a question, not an accusation.GilDodgen
December 20, 2006
December
12
Dec
20
20
2006
09:16 PM
9
09
16
PM
PDT
Good points. It's also worth noting as has been done quite well on the other posts, their YouTube performance does not rise to unforgiveable blasphemy.tribune7
December 20, 2006
December
12
Dec
20
20
2006
09:07 PM
9
09
07
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply