Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

“The New New Atheism” — by Peter Berkowitz

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Berkowitz has an insightful piece on the new new atheists. Here is an excerpt:

. . . But one stunning new development under the sun is that promulgating atheism has become a lucrative business. According to a recent article in The Wall Street Journal, in less than 12 months atheism’s newest champions have sold close to a million books. Some 500,000 hardcover copies are in print of Richard Dawkins’s “The God Delusion” (2006); 296,000 copies of Christopher Hitchens’s “God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything” (2007); 185,000 copies of Sam Harris’s “Letter to a Christian Nation” (2006); 64,100 copies of Daniel C. Dennett’s “Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon”; and 60,000 copies of Victor J. Stenger’s “God: The Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows that God Does not Exist” (2007).

Profitability is not the only feature distinguishing today’s fashionable disbelief from the varieties of atheism that have arisen over the millennia. Unlike the classical atheism of Epicurus and Lucretius, which rejected belief in the gods in the name of pleasure and tranquility, the new new atheism rejects God in the name of natural science, individual freedom and human equality. Unlike the Enlightenment atheism of the 18th century, which arose in a still predominantly religious society and which frequently went to some effort to disguise or mute its disbelief, the new new atheism proclaims its hatred of God and organized religion loudly and proudly from the rooftops. And unlike the anti-modern atheism of Nietzsche and Heidegger, which regarded the death of God as a catastrophe for the human spirit, the new new atheism sees the loss of religious faith in the modern world as an unqualified good, lamenting only the perverse and widespread resistance to shedding once and for all the hopelessly backward belief in a divine presence in history. . . .

MORE

Comments
Atheism has always been a logically difficult position for me to see. For the person holding this position must assert that he knows everything there is to know in order to rule God out(the atheists is really saying he has infinite and perfect knowledge to rule out One Who is Infinite and Perfect in knowledge) Since it is impossible for man, in his present state, to have infinite and perfect knowledge, then atheism is a blatantly absurd presumption. But atheists never were real big on logic. Here is another humerous "just so" story i found on Yahoo that explains that man starting walking upright to free up more energy for reproducing http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070716/ap_on_sc/standing_upbornagain77
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
04:13 PM
4
04
13
PM
PDT
Here’s a book that is a death-blow to atheism, IMO: Reason can never beat atheism -- at least the kind of which Hitchens and Dawkins are part -- because atheism is based solely on blind emotion. It is completely impervious to reason.tribune7
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
04:09 PM
4
04
09
PM
PDT
How many here think that this barage of books is a sign that the evolutionists are afraid that ID is making converts of atheists?PaV
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
02:46 PM
2
02
46
PM
PDT
"William Lane Craig wanted to debate Dawkins. Dawkins declined." I had always heard that it was Mr. Dembski himself that got declined to a debate with Dawkins. Then again, who knows how many debates Dawkins has turned down! I prefer a presuppositional approach to apologetics, but Craig is still very good. And yes, there are many good refutations of Dawkins' material out there...my favorite thorough one is here: http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2006/10/dawkins-delusion.htmlMathetes
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
02:37 PM
2
02
37
PM
PDT
"...in less than 12 months atheism’s newest champions have sold close to a million books. Some 500,000 hardcover copies are in print of Richard Dawkins’s “The God Delusion” (2006); 296,000 copies of Christopher Hitchens’s “God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything” (2007); 185,000 copies of Sam Harris’s “Letter to a Christian Nation” (2006); 64,100 copies of Daniel C. Dennett’s “Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon”; and 60,000 copies of Victor J. Stenger’s “God: The Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows that God Does not Exist” (2007)." This is scientific evidence that in spite of all the video games, TV programs , sports, movies, hobbies, etc., there are still people bored out of their mind.Smidlee
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
02:01 PM
2
02
01
PM
PDT
Hi Robo, I agree that in a battle of rhetoric and personality McGrath probably came up short. But he was not an embarrassment. He was scholarly, Christianly and relevant. His book Dawkins Delusion is a nice critique of the God Delusion, of which Michael Ruse said "The God Delusion makes me embarrassed to be an atheist, and the McGraths show why." You can also get a decent rebuttal of Dawkins just by reading reviews of his book, many by atheists, which obliterate it.
Dawkins has a superficial knowledge of the Bible and is intolerant of theists, yet demands tolerance of science ... Shermer is, however, critical of the book's polemic tone, he "cringed" at the title of the book and "winced" at Dawkins's derogative references to religious individuals ... Dawkins has insufficient understanding of the religious concepts he is attacking ... Far from being a serious philosophical book, this ill-edited and garrulous diatribe contains just about anything that crosses the author's mind" with “page after sarcastic page of attacks against any foe Dawkins considers an easy target.” Dawkins avoids the “real question" of "whether one's explanation terminates with a meaningless cosmos or with a being who provides a reason for things.” ... fails "to engage with religious thought in any serious way" relying instead on "extraneous quotation" and "anecdote after anecdote". He asserts that Dawkins "suffers from several problems when he tries to reason philosophically" and complains of "exercises in double standards" ... "there is hardly a serious work of philosophy of religion cited in his extensive bibliography, save for Richard Swinburne ... Dawkins' philosophy is "at best jejune"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Delusion Of the reviews I've read I'd highly recommend Pete Williams and, of course, Alvin Plantinga (a paraphrase from memory:"to call Dawkins' philosophizing sophomoric is an insult to sophomores]. I don't have links, but they were easy to find. Here's another good one: http://www.damaris.org/content/content.php?type=5&id=503 === Pastor Mark Roberts debated Hitchens on radio and he too, perhaps, did little better than come out even as he graciously refused a battle of rhetoric and soundbytes. However, he has a thorough review of Hitchens' book and a run-down of their debate in this series: http://www.markdroberts.com/htmfiles/resources/godisnotgreat.htm To see Hitchens fare rather more poorly when his opponent takes the offensive see this written debate with Doug Wilson. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/mayweb-only/119-12.0.htmlCharlie
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
01:33 PM
1
01
33
PM
PDT
I wish there were more men like William Lane Craig. Seems like great christians are few and far between- atleast thats my opinion.bork
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
01:19 PM
1
01
19
PM
PDT
Here's a book that is a death-blow to atheism, IMO: http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Have-Enough-Faith-Atheist/dp/1581345615/ref=pd_bbs_1/105-1105009-6070803?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1184616662&sr=8-1 by Norman GeislerScott
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
01:06 PM
1
01
06
PM
PDT
William Lane Craig: Books - http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/103-2515348-3277440?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=william+lane+craig Site- http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/PageServer Craig never loses debates, by the way. Atheists tremble in fear of him. Also see Ravi Zacharias: books - http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=pd_sc_1/105-1105009-6070803?ie=UTF8&search-alias=aps&field-keywords=ravi%20zacharias site - http://www.rzim.org/Scott
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
01:03 PM
1
01
03
PM
PDT
Where are the Christian scholars who openly challenge these guys to public debate?
William Lane Craig wanted to debate Dawkins. Dawkins declined.IDist
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
12:42 PM
12
12
42
PM
PDT
Where the the books, DVDs, MP3s, articles...... refuting these guys? Alister McGrath was an embarrassment in his debate with Dawkins. Where are the Christian scholars who openly challenge these guys to public debate?Robo
July 16, 2007
July
07
Jul
16
16
2007
12:30 PM
12
12
30
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply