Skip to content
Sunday, April 02, 2023

Uncommon Descent

Serving The Intelligent Design Community

  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Resources
    • Frequently raised but weak arguments against Intelligent Design
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Archive of Posts by Michael Behe
    • Darwinian Debating Devices
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Boxgrove

Tag: Boxgrove

Human evolution Intelligent Design

Early hominins (480,000 years ago) were—wait for it!—more sophisticated than thought

Maybe Darwinians should canvass at LinkedIn for a new subhuman.

Posted on August 14, 2020August 14, 2020 Author News Comments(2)

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Donate

Help us to continue generating quality content and reliable website service.

Recent Comments

  • Querius Bornagain77 @62, Thank you for not bothering linking to Nick Lane's paper on ATP, even for comedy relief. In his... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @58 We do not experience sense impressions for what they really are – namely electrical crackles, right? So, we do... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • critical rationalist @Ori Let’s take a concrete example: my certain knowledge that I exist. A concrete example? As in one of many?... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @81 ‘Darwinists’ don’t ‘deny’ teleological purpose because of their philosophical tendencies; they just think there is sufficient evidence to show... – L&FP, 69: A way to understand...
  • Querius While Chuckdarwin continues to avoid denouncing the ugly racism implicit in Darwinism, let me instead comment on Critical Rationalist's response... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • jerry We lack other universes to which we can compare our’s to. Right? Another stupid comment! Shows a complete lack of... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • critical rationalist Why answer the people denying the fine tuning? We lack other universes to which we can compare our's to. Right?... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • Alan Fox As BA77 didn't link to Nick Lane's paper on a pre-biotic origin for adenosine triphosphate (ATP), here it is. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001437 – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • chuckdarwin Querius I read it the first time (there's a dog-eared copy on my shelf along with the Origins) as a... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • critical rationalist CR, we both know that measurable, functionally specific, complex organisation and associated information is 200 years beyond Paley’s valid but... – L&FP, 69: A way to understand...
  • Querius Upright BiPed@58, What you are doing is denying the validity of design inference based on your personal ideology, and you... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @159 :)You can’t even define “mistake” in your Darwinian worldview. I do not have a "Darwinian worldview", whatever that's supposed... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • Sandy I won’t make that mistake again. :)You can't even define "mistake" in your Darwinian worldview. – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • Querius Chuckdarwin @55, Why would I resort to a chatbot when I have some of the world’s most renowned ID and... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • PyrrhoManiac1 @151 In response to my point (see 142) about the pragmatics and semantics of the words "certainty" and "knowledge", we... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • chuckdarwin Querius/44 Why would I resort to a chatbot when I have some of the world's most renowned ID and Bible... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • bornagain77 Of note: Origin of Life: Controversial Chemist Shakes up Scientific Community | Problems with Primordial Soup - March 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZugOrSD7YL4... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
  • Origenes // Correction #156 // – If you managed that, how could you infallibly interpret that infallible source? How do I... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • jerry including yours Be specific and they can be discussed. I was specifically referring to the fine tuning which is so... – L&FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning...
  • Origenes CR @140, 149 has some questions for me: – How could you infallibly identify a supposed infallible source, out of... – L&FP, 67: So-called "critical rationalism" and...
  • Alan Fox One of the emergent properties of RNA is that individual bases will pair bond (always Guanine with Cytosine, Adenine with... – A review of Nicholas Spencer’s Magisteria:...
Copyright © 2023 Uncommon Descent. All rights reserved.
Theme: Newspaper Plus by ThemeCentury. Powered by WordPress.