depression gene

Culture Darwinism Intelligent Design Media Science

Why do journalists “believe evolution” when the public doesn’t?

They are trying to interpret a world they don’t understand. They cling to Evolution (Darwinism) as TRUTH! because someone told them so. They are often not smart enough to see that any true story would be much more complex. Any interesting story is more complex too.

bornagain77 Seversky believes the mind to be totally material. That it... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
polistra Economic behavior is thoroughly lawful and predictable. Bubbles have been... – Physics envy is a terrible thing,...
Axel ' However, when evolutionary materialistic scientism is injected into the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
Axel Indeed, it would not be harmed. The connection of the... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
bill cole GP Sequence comparisons allow us, in the right context, to... – Controlling the waves of dynamic, far...
PaV From the Quota article: The list of species groups with... – Hybridization—long considered a “dead end”—may be...
Seversky John_a_designer@ 3 Subjective opinions, like Seversky’s, are not arguments. They... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
Seversky So when Dr Egnor operated on a human brain he... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
john_a_designer Notice that moral subjectivists, like Seversky, must begin with the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
doubter It's interesting to me that the enterprise of ID does... – Researcher: Evidence for early man in...
kairosfocus Still going strong – Live Event: On Life in the...
kairosfocus Egnor on the evidence against materialism: Discovery Science In this... – Egnor on the evidence against materialism:
doubter Does this really matter much? Does hybridization or the new... – Hybridization—long considered a “dead end”—may be...
kairosfocus JAD, you raise several key issues that tie into the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
kairosfocus EG, You have cross-threaded, but I will respond on the... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
Hugh Kenneth Jawa@659, yes, I do understand your point, and I admit... – Controlling the waves of dynamic, far...
john_a_designer Subjective opinions, like Seversky’s, are not arguments. They are just... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
LoneCycler For Sev @11 Darwin’s theory has no scientific credibility. And... – Another Darwinian mass shooting?
Ed George But Seversky was correct with his one line “Argumentum ad... – Logic & First Principles: What about...
ET Seversky: ...it would still say nothing about the theory’s scientific... – Another Darwinian mass shooting?
OLV Latemarch, Good questions. – Hybridization—long considered a “dead end”—may be...