Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Topic

flatworms

Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
October 6, 2021
Categorized
'Junk DNA', Darwinism, Intelligent Design
Tagged
, ,

Term “junk DNA” critiqued at journal. But now remember the history!

Denyse O'Leary
October 6, 2021
'Junk DNA', Darwinism, Intelligent Design
“The days of ‘junk DNA’ are over…”? So the house is clearly supporting this move away from the Darwinian position. Oh yes, let’s not forget that “junk DNA” was very much a Darwinian position. Most or all of the Darwinian Bigs signed onto junk DNA as part of their thesis about the unguided nature of life. The big question will doubtless be put off for now: Why does it only count if Darwinian predictions are right but never if they are wrong? Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
May 27, 2021
Categorized
Cell biology, Evolution, Genomics, Intelligent Design
Tagged
,

Cells compared across species — expected to be similar — prove strikingly different

Denyse O'Leary
May 27, 2021
Cell biology, Evolution, Genomics, Intelligent Design
At SciTechDaily: “I was struck by how stark the differences are between them,” said Tarashansky, who was lead author of the paper and is a Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Fellow. “We thought that they should have similar cell types, but when we try analyzing them using standard techniques, the method doesn’t recognize them as being similar.” Read More ›