Go here for the full pdf: http://www.uncommondescent.com/documentation/Judge_Jones_Peer_Rev_Reb.pdf. Go here for the full pdf: http://www.uncommondescent.com/documentation/Judge_Jones_Peer_Rev_Reb.pdf.
Month: August 2006
Why student activism is the key to winning this war
Since 1999, Kansas has now swung four times on the question of science standards and whether evolutionary theory should be properly scrutinized or swallowed whole. Below is the latest. This war will not be decided by courts, legislators, or school boards, but by young people as they wake up to the fact that dogmatic Darwinists Read More…
Troll-of-the-month award
Here is an email I received from a troll just after I started posting Jim Downard’s asinine emails to me. Presumably the troll wanted me to post the email as is. I am posting it, but without incriminating a prominent anti-ID proponent, whose career I was supposed to place in jeopardy, but which would have Read More…
Further evidence that biological innovation belongs to the science of engineering and not to the Victorian myth of unintelligent evolution
From the Lockheed Martin newsletter at http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/10051.pdf:  ÂÂ
Evolution Questions Network
More student activism to unmask evolutionary pretensions: MYSPACE: http://www.myspace.com/evolutionquestions XANGA: http://www.xanga.com/evolutionquestions LIVEJOURNAL: http://evoquestions.livejournal.com BLOGSPOT: http://www.evolutionquestions.blogspot.com
Oldie but goodie on Jerry Coyne and Bruce Alberts
With all the talk about Jerry Coyne lately, I just had to dig up this oldie but goodie from Phil Johnson. I think we should feel sorry for Jerry Coyne. His own work has contributed to the destruction of Darwinism, and he seems to be suffering from a condition I call metaphysical panic, resulting from Read More…
No ID, No Funding
This article (http://www.the-scientist.com/article/daily/23793) presents the ongoing controversy over whether an evolutionist presented “adequate justification for the assumption in the proposal that the theory of evolution, and not intelligent design theory, was correct†. . . in his grant proposal!
Darwin’s valiant defenders contradicting themselves
I’ve reported on this blog Coyne’s NewRepublic review of Coulter (go here) and Hotz’s LATimes review of Quammen, Brockman, an Shermer (go here). There’s an interesting contradiction between the two reviews. See if you can catch it. Compare Jerry Coyne’s insistence that The real reason Coulter goes after evolution is not because it’s wrong, but because Read More…
ID and Gaia
[From a colleague in the UK:] The current issue of the British Ecological Society Bulletin has a special feature on Gaia. It appears that James Lovelock was made an Honorary Member of the B.E.S. in 2005, and the Gaia hypothesis is his “most significant contribution to ecology”. Apparently, the Gaia hypothesis posits that the earth’s Read More…