2012
Mathematicians and researchers to boycott Elsevier journals?
Genes Have Play, Stop and Pause Buttons
You probably remember from biology class that genes hold information that is used to construct protein and RNA molecules which do various tasks in the cell. A gene is copied in a process known as transcription. In the case of a protein-coding gene the transcript is edited and converted into a protein in a process known as translation. What you may not have learned is the elaborate regulatory processes that occurs before, during and after this sequence of transcription, editing and translation. Read more
Jerry Coyne’s hilarious takedown of Chris Mooney’s new “yer politics is in yer genes” book
Tom Bethell on Noam Chomsky’s dissent from Darwin
The eleventh icon of evolution: The mystery of the lost archaeopteryx
The new scientific paradigm? Feelings rule?
Memo to Discovery Institute: 50 peer-reviewed ID-friendly papers won’t make any difference
“Living fossil” primates communicate by ultrasound
Discovery Institute 2012 Summer Seminars, JULY 6-14, 2012 Seattle, WA
Two years ago, I had the tremendous opportunity to travel to Seattle, Washington, and take part in Discovery Institute’s yearly summer seminar for undergraduate and graduate students. Truth be told, it was one of the most memorable experiences of my life. I had the chance to interact at a one-on-one level with key ID scholars including William Dembski, Jonathan Wells, Paul Nelson, Richard Sternberg, Stephen C. Meyer, Scott Minnich, Michael Behe, Douglas Axe, Ann Gauger, Jay Richards, and Bruce Gordon (and more!). I also made many good friends from all over the world, most of whom I have remained in contact with even until now. If you are a postgraduate or undergraduate student who is keen on ID and is Read More ›
How the zebra did NOT get its stripes?
Yeti’s House is Safe
Anyone remember how the UN panel assured us the Himalayan glaciers would melt completely in 25 years? Now we know they are not melting at all. Do you think all the climate alarmists are slapping their foreheads and yelling “Doh! Maybe I should reevaluate my position”? Me neither.
A Scoville Scale for Dangerous Questions
As Denyse pointed out (go here), Steven Pinker’s “dangerous questions” were really pretty mild stuff. I’d like to propose a Scoville scale for dangerous questions (based on the hotness of chili peppers). In the comments, please include what you regard as dangerous questions for materialism as well as a “hotness” measure for each question. Let me get the ball rolling: What would happen if the general public not only disbelieved materialism (as it is, they disbelieve it now) but also decided to cease funding it out of their tax dollars? [Hotness = Serrano Pepper]