2012
Thursdayites
An article over at classical conversations takes on the establishment’s insistence that common descent is as well-evidenced as has been suggested.
Read More ›
Microsoft “Windows Evolution” Announcement Roils Markets
Bill Dembski on the Evolutionary Informatics Lab – the one a Baylor dean tried to shut down
How do cells suddenly create their little incinerators from scratch?
Darwinism: Extensive “editing” of RNA requires no intelligent design?
Q: “What does the design theory debate have to do with the law of non-contradiction (LNC)?” A: “A lot!”
The latest flare-ups in the debates over design theory in and around UD have pivoted on the Law of non-contradiction; one of the most debated classical principles of logic. Why on earth is that so? The simple short answer is: if we are to make progress in debates and discussions, we must be at minimum agreed on being reasonable and rational. In more details, LNC is one of a cluster of first principles of right reason that are pivotal to core rationality, and for years now, debates over design theory issues have often tracked back to a peculiar characteristic of the evolutionary materialist worldview: it tends strongly to reject the key laws of thought, especially, identity, excluded middle and non-contradiction, Read More ›
Excavation of early human sites: Here’s the guy you want on your team
He said it: Beethoven on fine tuning of the universe
Definition of life: Amino acids, sugars could be “very primitive and simplistic life forms”?
Most sociopaths are atheists? So says screen star Denzel Washington
Darwinian cosmologist Lee Smolin: “theories which embrace the evolution of laws have a better chance …”
Why is Barry Arrington Stifling Dissent at UD?
If you visit some of our more vociferous opponents’ websites that is the question being asked. The answer, of course, is that I am not stifling rational argument on this site. In fact, just the opposite is true; my purpose has been to weed out those who refuse to engage in rational argument so that rational argument can be pursued by those who remain. Since, however, recent modifications to this site’s moderation policy have caused such a brouhaha, I feel compelled to lay out a formal defense. 1. The Rules of Thought. The rules of thought are the first principles of right reason. Those rules are: The Law of Identity: An object is the same as itself. The Law of Read More ›